CFP last date
20 January 2025
Reseach Article

Additive and Multiplicative Noise Removal by using Gradient Histogram Preservations Approach

by Nikita Roy, Vismay Jain
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 130 - Number 2
Year of Publication: 2015
Authors: Nikita Roy, Vismay Jain
10.5120/ijca2015906876

Nikita Roy, Vismay Jain . Additive and Multiplicative Noise Removal by using Gradient Histogram Preservations Approach. International Journal of Computer Applications. 130, 2 ( November 2015), 11-16. DOI=10.5120/ijca2015906876

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2015906876,
author = { Nikita Roy, Vismay Jain },
title = { Additive and Multiplicative Noise Removal by using Gradient Histogram Preservations Approach },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { November 2015 },
volume = { 130 },
number = { 2 },
month = { November },
year = { 2015 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 11-16 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume130/number2/23180-2015906876/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2015906876 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T23:23:56.499780+05:30
%A Nikita Roy
%A Vismay Jain
%T Additive and Multiplicative Noise Removal by using Gradient Histogram Preservations Approach
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 130
%N 2
%P 11-16
%D 2015
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Image denoising is a traditional yet essential issue in low level vision. Existing denoising technique denoise image but these techniques doesn’t concern about multiplicative noise removals. Due to that image texture are not preserved and PSNR value does not properly improved. Image denoising technique uses a novel Gradient Histogram Preservation (GHP) algorithm which preserves image quality. Presently, this technique denoises only additive noise removal. It cannot be applied to non-additive removal, such as multiplicative, Poisson noise and signal-independent noise and it also takes more time in calculations. Since both the noises are dissimilar in nature therefore it is difficult to eliminate both the noises by using single filter. To solve the above issue ,in this paper a novel GHP approach is used to remove additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) effectively. Since speckle noise is multiplicative in nature; it is converted into additive noise by logarithmic transformation method before apply GHP algorithm. In this paper we use the approach that is to acquire a logarithmic transformation, calculate a covariance matrix of the transformed data, generate random number which follows mean zero and variance/covariance c times the variance/covariance computed in the previous step, then take antilog of the normalized data and apply novel technique using, Fast Fourier Transfer (FFT), Gaussian filter, local content metrics texture ,Iterative Histogram Specifications (IHS) which can denoise both types of noise removal, additive and non-additive noise removal and also takes less calculation time.. In image processing FFT is used in a wide variety of applications, like image analysis, image reconstruction, image filtering and image compression . Gaussian separating is utilized to obscure pictures and evacuate clamor. The proposed algorithm offers to remove the multiplicative noise and improves the visual quality of images.

References
  1. Sarawat Anam, Md Shohidul Islam, M.A. Kasheem, M.N. Islam, M.R. Islam,”Face Recognition using Genetic Algorithm and Back Propagation Neural Network”, Proceedings of the International Multi Conference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, March 18-20, 2009.
  2. S. Zeenathunisa, A.Jaya, M.A. Rabbani,” A Biometric Approach towards Recognizing Face in Various Dark Illuminations”, IEEE, 2011, pp 1-7
  3. M.Elad and M. Aharon, “Image denoising via sparse and redundant representations over learned dictionaries”, IEEE Trans. Image Process, vol.15, no. 12,pp. 3736-3745,Dec.2006.
  4. Buades, B. Coll, and J. Morel, “A review of image denoising methods, with a new one, Multiscale Model”. Simul., vol.4, no. 2, pp. 490-530,2005.
  5. K. Dabov, A. Foi, V. Katkovnik, and K. Egiazarian, “Image denoising by sparse 3-D transform-domain collaborative filtering”, IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 16, no. 8,pp. 2080-2095, Aug. 2007.
  6. C. Tomasi and R. Manduchi, Bilateral Filtering For Gray and Color Images, Proceedings of IEEE international Conference on Computer Vision, pp.839-846, 1998.
  7. Julesz, “Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions”, Nature, vol. 290, pp. 91-97, Mar. 1981
  8. J.R. Sveinsson and J.A. Benediktsson, Double Density Wavelet Transformation for Speckle Reduction Of SAR Images, IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, vol.1, pp.113-115,. 2013
  9. H. Lewis, Principle and Applications of Imaging Radar, vol. 2 of Manual of Remote Sensing, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 3rd edition, 1998.
  10. P.Y. Chen and C.Y. Lien, An Efficient Edge-Preserving Algorithm for Removal of Salt and Pepper Noise, IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol.15, pp.833-836, 2008
  11. Wangmeng Zuo, Lei Zhang, Chunwei Song, David Zhan and Huijun Gao, "Gradient Histogram Estimation and Preservation for Texture Enhanced Image Denoising", IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2013.
  12. L. Wei, New Method for Image Denoising while Keeping Edge Information, 2nd IEEE International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, pp.1-5,2009.
  13. Sriram, S., Nitin, S., Prabhu, K.M.M., Bastiaans, M.J., "Signal denoising techniques for partial discharge measurements", IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, Volume:12 , Issue: 6, Dec. 2005
  14. Frederick M. Waltza,John W. V. Millerb, "An efficient algorithm for Gaussian blur using finite-state machines", E Conf. on Machine Vision Systems for Inspection and Metrology, Nov. 1998
  15. Xiang Zhu,Peyman Milanfar, "Automatic Parameter Selection for Denoising Algorithms Using a No-Reference Measure of Image Content", IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, VOL. 19, NO. 12, DECEMBER 2010.
  16. R. Fergus, B. Singh, A. Hertzmann, S. Roweis, and W. T. Freeman, “Removing camera shake from a single photograph,” in Proc. ACM SIGGRAPH, pp. 787-794, 2006.
  17. A. Levin, R. Fergus, F. Durand, and W. T. Freeman, “Image and depth from a conventional camera with a coded aperture,” in Proc. ACM SIGGRAPH, 2007.
  18. D. Krishnan, R. Fergus, “Fast image deconvolution using hyper- Laplacian priors,” in Proc. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., pp. 1033-1041, 2009.
  19. K. Suzuki, I. Horiba, and N. Sugie, “Efficient approximation of neural filters for removing quantum noise from images,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 1787-1799, Jul. 2002.
  20. V. Jain and H. Seung, “Natural image denoising with convolutional networks,” in Proc. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., pp. 769-776, 2008.
  21. H. C. Burger, C. J. Schuler, and S. Harmeling, “Image denoising: can plain neural networks compete with BM3D?,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Compu.Vis. Pattern Recognit., pp. 2392-2399, 16-21 June 2012.
  22. A. Levin, Y. Weiss, F. Durand, and W. T. Freeman, “Efficient marginal likelihood optimization in blind deconvolution,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Compu. Vis. Pattern Recognit., pp. 2657-2664, 20-25 June 2011.
  23. T. S. Cho, C. L. Zitnick, N. Joshi, S. B. Kang, R. Szeliski, and W. T. Freeman, “Image restoration by matching gradient distributions,” IEEE. Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 683-694, Apr. 2012.
  24. T. S. Cho, N. Joshi, C. L. Zitnick, S. B. Kang, R. Szeliski, and W. T.Freeman, “A content-aware image prior,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Compu. Vis.Pattern Recognit., pp. 169-176, 13-18 June 2010.
  25. N. Joshi, C. L. Zitnick, R. Szeliski, and D. Kriegman, “Image deblurring and denoising using color priors,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Compu. Vis. Pattern Recognit., pp. 1550-1557, 20-25 June 2009.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Multiplicative noise Texture histogram specifications sparse matrix representations local content matrix