We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

PWIS: Personalized Web Image Search using One-Click Method

by Pushpa C.N., Vinay Kumar N.K., Thriveni J., Venugopal K.R.
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 130 - Number 10
Year of Publication: 2015
Authors: Pushpa C.N., Vinay Kumar N.K., Thriveni J., Venugopal K.R.
10.5120/ijca2015907101

Pushpa C.N., Vinay Kumar N.K., Thriveni J., Venugopal K.R. . PWIS: Personalized Web Image Search using One-Click Method. International Journal of Computer Applications. 130, 10 ( November 2015), 39-47. DOI=10.5120/ijca2015907101

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2015907101,
author = { Pushpa C.N., Vinay Kumar N.K., Thriveni J., Venugopal K.R. },
title = { PWIS: Personalized Web Image Search using One-Click Method },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { November 2015 },
volume = { 130 },
number = { 10 },
month = { November },
year = { 2015 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 39-47 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume130/number10/23249-2015907101/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2015907101 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T23:25:38.556861+05:30
%A Pushpa C.N.
%A Vinay Kumar N.K.
%A Thriveni J.
%A Venugopal K.R.
%T PWIS: Personalized Web Image Search using One-Click Method
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 130
%N 10
%P 39-47
%D 2015
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Personalized Web Image search is the one searching for the particular images of User intention on the Web. For searching images, a user might provide query terms like keyword, image file, or click on few image file, and therefore the system can determine the images similar to the query. The similarity used for search criteria could be Meta tags, color distribution in images, region/shapes attributes, etc. Web-scale image search engines namely Google and Bing searches for images are relying on the surrounding text features. It is highly cumbersome and complicated for the web-scale based image search engines to interpret users search intention only by querying of keywords. This leads to the incorporation of noise and high ambiguity in the search results which are extremely unfit in the context of the users. It's also a necessary mandate for using visual information for solving the problem of ambiguity in the text-based image retrieval scenario. In the case of Google search, search text box will auto complete while user is typing similar added keywords. This method will differ from user intention while searching. So to avoid this kind of faults, it is important to use visual information in order to solve the uncertainty in text-based image retrieval. To retrieve exact matching, and acquire user’s intention we can allow them text query with extended or related images as a suggestion. We have proposed an innovative Web image search approach. It only needs the user to click on one query image with minimal effort and images from a pool fetched by text-based search are re-ranked based on both visual and textual contents.

References
  1. K. Yadav and S. Singh, “Improving Web Image Search Re-Ranking using Hybrid Approach”, International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, 2005.
  2. P. Chouragade and P. Chatur, “Visual Re-rank: Applying to Large Scale Image Search as a Soft Computing Approach,” International Journal of Management, IT and Engineering, 3(3), 99–115, 2013.
  3. Hsu, W. H., Kennedy, L. S. and Chang, S.F. 2006. Video Search Re-ranking via Information Bottleneck Principle. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM International Conference on Multimedia, (MULTIMEDIA 06), ACM, 35-44.
  4. Huang, Y., Liu, Q., Zhang, S. and Metaxas, D. N. 2010. Image Retrieval via Probabilistic Hypergraph Ranking, In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR - 2010), 3376–3383.
  5. Ben-Haim, N., Babenko B. and Belongie, S. 2006. Improving Web-based Image Search via Content Based Clustering, In Proceedings of the SLAM, (New York City).
  6. Fergus, R., Perona P. and Zisserman, A. 2004. A Visual Category Filter for Google Images, In Proceedings of the Computer Vision-ECCV 2004, 242– 256,Springer.
  7. Park, G., Baek, Y. and Lee, H. K. 2006. Web Image Retrieval using Majority-based Ranking Approach, In Proceedings of the Multimedia Tools and Applications, 31(2),195–219.
  8. Ng, H. T., Leong, M. K., Kan, M. Y. and Ji, D. 2006. Information Retrieval Technology, In Proceedings of the Third Asia Information Retrieval Symposium AIRS 2006, (Singapore).
  9. O. Chum and J. Matas, “Optimal Randomized RANSAC,” Journal of IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 30(8), 1472–1482, 2008.
  10. Ah-Pine, J., Bressan, M., Clinchant, S. Csurka, G. Hoppenot, Y .and Renders, J. M. 2009. Crossing Textual and Visual Content in Different Application Scenarios, In Proceedings of the Multimedia Tools and Applications, 42(1), 31-56.
  11. Krapac, J., Allan, M., Verbeek J. and Jurie, F. 2010. Improving Web Image Search Results using Query-Relative Classifiers, In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR- 2010), 1094–1101.
  12. Natsev, A. P., Haubold, A., Tesic, J., Xie, .L. and Yan, R. 2007. Semantic Concept-based Query Expansion and Re-ranking for Multimedia Retrieval, In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Multimedia, 991–1000, ACM.
  13. Smith, J. R., Naphade M. and Natsev, A. 2003. Multimedia Semantic Indexing using Model Vectors. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME?03),IEEE, 445–448.
  14. Frome, A., Singer, Y., Sha F. and Malik, J. 2007. Learning Globally-Consistent Local Distance Functions for Shape-based Image Retrieval and Classification. In Proceedings of the IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision(ICCV 2007), 1–8.
  15. Lin, Y. Y., Liu, T. L. and Fuh, C.S., 2007. Local Ensemble Kernel Learning for Object Category Recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition(CVPR 07), 1–8.
  16. G. Chechik, V. Sharma, U. Shalit and S. Bengio, “Large Scale Online Learning of Image Similarity through Ranking”, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11, 1109–1135, 2010.
  17. Deng, J., Berg, A. C and Fei-Fei, L. 2011. Hierarchical Semantic Indexing for Large Scale Image Retrieval. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR-2011), 785-792, IEEE.
  18. Xiaoou Tang, Ke Liu, Jingyu Cui, S , Fang Wen and Xiaogang Wang, “IntentSearch: Capturing User Intention for One-Click Internet Image Search”, Journal of IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligenace, 34(7), July 2012.
  19. He, J., Li, M., Zhang, H., Tong, H. and Zhang, C. 2004. PseudoRelevance Feed Based on Iterative Probabilistic One-Class SVMs in Web Image Retrieval. In Proceedings of the Pacific-Rim Conference Multimedia.
  20. Yan, R., Hauptmann, E. and Jin, R. 2013. Negative Pseudo-Relevance Feedback in Content- Based Video Retrieval. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, ACM.
  21. Ah-Pine, J., Bressan, M., Clinchant, S., Csurka, G., Hoppenot, Y. and Renders, J. 2009. Crossing Textual and Visual Content in Different Application Scenarios,Multimedia Tools and Applications, 42, 31–56.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Image search Keyword Expansion One-Click Method Personalized Web Image Search Re-ranking User Intention.