CFP last date
20 January 2025
Reseach Article

A Simplified Analytical Model for End-To-End Delay Analysis in MANET

Published on None 2010 by Rakesh Kumar, Manoj Misra, Anil K. Sarje
Mobile Ad-hoc Networks
Foundation of Computer Science USA
MANETS - Number 4
None 2010
Authors: Rakesh Kumar, Manoj Misra, Anil K. Sarje
2747d2a1-1556-48e7-a529-7f9711770810

Rakesh Kumar, Manoj Misra, Anil K. Sarje . A Simplified Analytical Model for End-To-End Delay Analysis in MANET. Mobile Ad-hoc Networks. MANETS, 4 (None 2010), 195-199.

@article{
author = { Rakesh Kumar, Manoj Misra, Anil K. Sarje },
title = { A Simplified Analytical Model for End-To-End Delay Analysis in MANET },
journal = { Mobile Ad-hoc Networks },
issue_date = { None 2010 },
volume = { MANETS },
number = { 4 },
month = { None },
year = { 2010 },
issn = 0975-8887,
pages = { 195-199 },
numpages = 5,
url = { /specialissues/manets/number4/1033-81/ },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Special Issue Article
%1 Mobile Ad-hoc Networks
%A Rakesh Kumar
%A Manoj Misra
%A Anil K. Sarje
%T A Simplified Analytical Model for End-To-End Delay Analysis in MANET
%J Mobile Ad-hoc Networks
%@ 0975-8887
%V MANETS
%N 4
%P 195-199
%D 2010
%I International Journal of Computer Applications
Abstract

In order to provide quality delivery to delay sensitive applications such as voice and video, it is extremely important that mobile Ad hoc networks provide quality of service (QoS) support in terms of bandwidth and delay. In spite of using IEEE 802.11 as medium access control (MAC), most of the Ad hoc routing protocols do not consider MAC delay contention time, which occurs, in the medium reservation. Large contention times can be more critical than hop counts in determining the end-to-end delay. Most existing MANET routing protocols such as AODV, DSR and OLSR are designed to search for the shortest path with minimum hop counts. However, the shortest routes do not always provide the best performance, especially when there are congested nodes along these routes. In this paper we present an analytical model for average end-to-end delay that takes into account the packet arrival process, backoff and collision avoidance mechanisms of random access MAC between a pair of source and destination and compares the end-to-end delay experienced by a QoS AODV protocol. The proposed analytical model results closely match with the results obtained from our simulations.

References
  1. Taesoo Jun, Angela Dalton, et al., “Expressive Analytical Model for Routing Protocols in Mobile Ad hoc Networks,” 2007
  2. Sharma et al., “Modeling and Analysis of End-To-End Delay for Ad hoc Pervasive Multimedia Network,” Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists 2010, Vol. 1, IMECS 2010, March 17-19, 2010, Hong Kong.
  3. Dong LinFang et al., “Packet delay analysis on IEEE 802.11 DCF under finite load traffic in multi-hop Ad hoc Networks,”Science in China Series F:Information Sciences, April 2008, Vol. 51, No. 4, pp. 408-416.
  4. Rima Khalaf, Izhak Rubin, “Throughput and delay analysis in single hop and multi-hop IEEE 802.11 Networks,” 2006 IEEE.
  5. Christian Bettstetter and Jorg Eberspacher, “Hop Distances in Homogeneous Ad hoc Networks,” IEEE 2003.
  6. R. Rom and M. Sidi, Multiple Access Protocols: Performance and Analysis, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990, pp. 9.
  7. K. Fall, K. Varadhan, “The ns manual” http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/doc/ns_doc.pdf.pdf 2002.
  8. O. Tickoo and B. Sikdar, “Queuing analysis and delay mitigation in IEEE 802.11 random access MAC based wireless networks,” in proceedings of the 23rd Annual Joint conference of IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM’04), Vol. 2, pp. 1404-1413, Hong Kong, March 2004.
  9. J. Chen and y. yang, “Multi-hop delay performance in wireless mesh networks,” in Proceedings of IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (Globecom ’06), pp. 1-5, San Francisco, Calif, USA, November-December 2006.
  10. B. Shrader, M. Sanchez, and T. C. Giles, “Throughput-delay Analysis of Conflict-free Scheduling in multihop Ad hoc Networks,” Proceedings of the 3rd Swedish Workshop on Wireless Ad hoc Networks, Stockholm, Johannesbergs Slott, 6-7 May 2003.
  11. Pradeep Macharala, Rakesh Kumar, Anil K. Sarje, Manoj Misra, “A QoS Routing Protocol for Delay-Sensitive Applications in Mobile Ad hoc Networks,” Second IEEE Workshop on Intelligent Networks: Adaptation, Communication and Reconfiguration (IAMCOM 2008), January 10, 2008, Bangalore, India.
  12. S.T. Sheu, and J. Chen, “A Novel Delay-Oriented Shortest Path Routing Protocol for Mobile Ad hoc Networks,” Proceedings of IEEE ICC 2001, Vol. 6, pp. 1930-1934, 2001.
  13. “Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) specifications,” IEEE Standards 802.11, 1999.
  14. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANET) Working Group Charter, http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/manet-charter.html.
  15. Royer, E. M. & Toh, C. K. (1999). A Review of Current Routing Protocols for Ad hoc Mobile Wireless Networks. IEEE Personal Communications, 6(2), 46-55.
  16. C.E. Perkins, and E.M. Belding-Royer, “Quality of Service for Ad hoc On Demand Distance Vector Routing,” draft-perkins-manet-aodvqos-02.txt, Mobile Ad hoc Networking Working Group Internet Draft, 14 October 2003.
  17. C. E. Perkins, E. M. Belding-Royer and S. Das, “Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing”, draft-perkins-manet-aodvbis-00.txt, Internet Draft, 19 October 2003.
  18. J. H. Song, V. Wong, and V. C. M. Leung, “Load-Aware On-Demand Routing (LAOR) Protocol for Mobile Ad hoc Networks”, Proceedings of IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC-Spring), Jeju, Korea, April 2003.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Mobile Ad hoc network AODV QoS delay MAC NS2 Modeling