This paper describes an approach to integrate knowledge base via converting predicates into Semantic networks and in frames. A knowledge base can be represented in a tabular form, a rule form, a tree form or any other form suitable for knowledge representation. Form conversion can be accomplished at all times. Unification of knowledge always overcome individual limitations and has synergetic effects in knowledge extraction. The graphical representation of knowledge base has more understandability than any other representation. Aim of this paper is to develop a system which accepts input from the user in the form of predicates and generates outputs with graphical representation of semantic networks as well as of frames.

1. Chaudhary Deepa, "Extracting EHCPRs Rules from Existing Knowledge Bases" International Conferences on Issues and Challenges in Network, Intelligence & Computing Technologies, 2-3 Sep. ,2011.
2. V. Maniraj, Dr. R Sivakumar, "Ontology Languages-A Review". IACSIT.
3. McDermott Drew, Doyle John, 1980, "Non-monotonic Logic", Artificial Intelligence, vol. 13, pp. 41-72.
4. Quillian, M. R 1968, "Semantic Memory", in M. Minski, Ed. , Semantic Information Processing, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
5. Marvin Minsky, "A Framework for Representing Knowledge", MIT-AI Laboratory, Memo 306, 1974.
6. Davis R. and Buchanan B. G,"Production rules as a representation system for a knowledge based Consultation system", Artificial intelligence, vol 8, pp. 15-45.
7. Schank R. C and Abelson P. P, 1977, "Scripts Plans Goals and Understanding",Hillsdale,N. J.
8. Deepa Chaudhary, Praveen K. Yadaav, Rakesh K. Singh, Sudhanshu Mishra,Siddharth , "Enriching the Knowledgebase Using Unification Technioques","ARTCom 2012".

Knowledge Representation Predicate Logic Semantic Network Frames Ontology Script And Production Rule