CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

Do Organizations Benefit from e-Workers

Published on None 2011 by Seyed Mohammad Mortazavi
Wireless Information Networks & Business Information System
Foundation of Computer Science USA
WINBIS - Number 1
None 2011
Authors: Seyed Mohammad Mortazavi
6b8a27eb-0adb-4c4d-bdf2-e12005f0771f

Seyed Mohammad Mortazavi . Do Organizations Benefit from e-Workers. Wireless Information Networks & Business Information System. WINBIS, 1 (None 2011), 22-25.

@article{
author = { Seyed Mohammad Mortazavi },
title = { Do Organizations Benefit from e-Workers },
journal = { Wireless Information Networks & Business Information System },
issue_date = { None 2011 },
volume = { WINBIS },
number = { 1 },
month = { None },
year = { 2011 },
issn = 0975-8887,
pages = { 22-25 },
numpages = 4,
url = { /proceedings/winbis/number1/2045-192/ },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Proceeding Article
%1 Wireless Information Networks & Business Information System
%A Seyed Mohammad Mortazavi
%T Do Organizations Benefit from e-Workers
%J Wireless Information Networks & Business Information System
%@ 0975-8887
%V WINBIS
%N 1
%P 22-25
%D 2011
%I International Journal of Computer Applications
Abstract

In the digitally connected world of today a whole new set of relations between people has been defined which has not left the business environment untouched. Among the outcomes of this trend with unknown positive potentials and, certainly, weaknesses worthy of deeper studies is the newly-discussed topic of e-workers. Though, there have been certain issues discussed by researchers in this field; the results have not yet proved this notion of being merely positive or negative, as a result this issue is still practically dim. In this regard, organizational interrelations, influence of digital relations on worker’s trust and commitment, vocational psychology, diversity of the workers and its effects on team working and organizational culture, legal definitions, official issues and internal costs are among the key subjects to be reviewed. However, recent studies have revealed that, identifying all the potentials of e-workers, face-to-face relations are still more preferred. This study paper, which is an open one, is on investigating of the primary steps of developing a meta-analysis on the relevant literature.

References
  1. Bailey, D. E., & Kurland, N. B. (2002). A review of telework research: Findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 383–400.
  2. Ballinger, G. A., & Schoorman, F. D. (2007). Individual reactions to leadership succession in workgroups. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 118–136.
  3. Bement, A. L. (2007). Cyber infrastructure: The second revolution. Information technology. The Chronicle of Higher Education, January 5, B5–B6.
  4. Bland, V. (2001). E-management: Where it’s headed and how to get there. Management, November, 44–58.
  5. Bland, V. (2004). E-management, where it delivers most. Management, November, 52–57.
  6. Bordia, P. (1997). Face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication: A synthesis of the experimental literature. The Journal of Business Communication, 34(1), 99–120.
  7. Burris, B. H. (1998). Computerization of the workplace. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 141–157.
  8. Chandra, C., Kumar, S., & Smirnov, A. V. (2002). E-management of supply chain: General models taxonomy. Human Systems Management, 21, 95–113.
  9. DeSouza, K. C. (2005). Book review of “The Internet in the workplace: How new technology is transforming workplace”. The Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 443–445.
  10. Friedman, T. L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  11. Garavan, T. N., & Carbery, R. (2007). Managing intentionally created communities of practice for knowledge sourcing across organizational boundaries. The Learning Organization: The International Journal of Knowledge and Organizational Learning Management, 14(1), 34–49.
  12. Gibson, C. (2006). New skills required for virtual teams. BizEd, July/August, 50–52.
  13. Golden, T. (2006). The role of relationships in understanding telecommuter satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 240–319.
  14. Herman, J. (1999). Are you ready for e-management? Business Communication Review, December, 20–21.
  15. Jacobs, G. (2008). Constructing corporate commitment amongst remote employees. A disposition and predisposition approach. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 13(1), 42–55.
  16. Latapie, H. M., & Tran, V. N. (2007). Subculture formation, evolution and conflict between regional teams in virtual organizations. The Business Review, Cambridge, 7(2), 189–193.
  17. Mackenzie, M.L. (2010). Manager communication and workplace trust: Understanding manager and employee perceptions in the e-world. International Journal of Information Management, doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.04.001
  18. Merriman, K. K., Schmidt, S. M., Ross, G., & Dunlap-Hinkler, D. (2004). Virtual intraorganizational authority relationships: Implications for trust, support, and influence. Academy of Management Best Conference Paper, 11–15.
  19. Merriman, K. K., Schmidt, S. M., & Dunlap-Hinkler, D. (2007). Profiling virtual employees: The impact of managing virtually. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 14(6), 6–15.
  20. Qualman, E. (2009). Socialnomics. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  21. Solomon, C. M. (2001). Managing virtual teams. Workforce. URL: www.workforce.com. June 1: 60–64 [last date retrieved: 29.11.09].
  22. Warkentin, M. E., Sayeed, L., & Hightower, R. (1997). Virtual teams versus face-to-face teams: An exploratory study of a web-based conference system. Decision Sciences, 28(4), 975–996.
  23. Zuboff, S. (1988). In the age of the smart machine. New York: Basic Books.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

e-worker e-people e-Human Resource