Security is a major concern for protected communication between mobile nodes in a hostile environment. In hostile environments adversaries can bunch active and passive attacks against intercept able routing in embed in routing message and data packets. In this paper, we focus on fundamental security attacks in Mobile adhoc networks. MANET has no clear line of defense, so, it is accessible to both legitimate network users and malicious attackers. In the presence of malicious nodes, one of the main challenges in MANET is to design the robust security solution that can protect MANET from various routing attacks. However, these solution are not suitable for MANET resource constraints, i.e., limited bandwidth and battery power, because they introduce heavy traffic load to exchange and verifying keys. MANET can operate in isolation or in coordination with a wired infrastructure, often through a gateway node participating in both networks for traffic relay. This flexibility, along with their self-organizing capabilities, is some of MANETs biggest strengths, as well as their biggest security weaknesses. In this paper different routing attacks, such as active (flooding, black hole, spoofing, and wormhole) and passive (eavesdropping, traffic monitoring, and traffic analysis) are described.

1. C.-C. Chiang, "Routing in Clustered Multihop, Mobile Wireless Networks with Fading Channel," Proc. /E€€ SlCON '97, Apr. 1997, pp. 197-211
2. Th. Clausen et al., “Optimized Link State Routing Protocol,” IETF Internet draft, draft-ietfmanet-olsr-11.txt, July 2003.
3. B. Kannhavong, H. Nakayama, Y. Nemoto, N. Kato, A. Jamalipour. A survey of routing attacks in mobile ad hoc networks. Security in wireless mobile ad hoc and sensor networks, October 2007, page, 85-91
4. Z. Karakehayov, “Using REWARD to Detect Team Black-Hole Attacks in Wireless Sensor Networks,” Wksp. Real-World Wireless Sensor Networks, June 20–21, 2005.
5. S. Desilva, and R. V. Boppana, “Mitigating Malicious Control Packet Floods in Ad Hoc Networks,” Proc. IEEE Wireless Commun. and Networking Conf., New Orleans, LA, 2005.
6. S. Lee, B. Han, and M. Shin, “Robust Routing in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks,” 2002 Int’l. Conf. Parallel Processing Wksps., Vancouver, Canada, Aug. 18–21, 2002.
7. S. Kurosawa et al., “Detecting Blackhole Attack on AODV-Based Mobile Ad Hoc Networks by Dynamic Learning Method,” Proc. Int’l. J. Network Sec., 2006.
8. D. Johnson and D. Maltz, “Dynamic Source Routing in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks,” Mobile Computing, T. Imielinski and H. Korth, Ed., pp. 153-81. Kluwer, 1996.
9. Jyoti Raju and J.J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, “ A comparison of On-Demand and Table-Driven Routing for Ad Hoc Wireless etworks’,” in Proceeding of IEEE ICC, June 2000.
10. Y-C. Hu, A. Perrig, and D. Johnson, “Wormhole Attacks in Wireless Networks,” IEEE JSAC, vol. 24, no. 2, Feb. 2006.
11. M. Al-Shurman, S-M. Yoo, and S. Park, “Black Hole Attack in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks,” ACM Southeast Regional Conf. 2004.
12. M. G. Zapata and N. Asokan, “Securing Ad-Hoc Routing Protocols,” Proc. 2002 ACM Wksp. Wireless Sec., Sept. 2002, pp. 1–10.
13. K. Sanzgiri et al., “A Secure Routing Protocol for Ad Hoc Networks,” Proc. 2002 IEEE Int’l. Conf. Network Protocols, Nov. 2002.
14. C. Perkins and E Royer, “Ad Hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing,” 2nd IEEE Wksp. Mobile Comp. Sys. and Apps., 1999.
15. P. Yi et al., “A New Routing Attack in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks,” Int’l. J. Info. Tech., vol. 11, no. 2, 2005.

Military Battlefield Sensor Networks Medical Service