Mobility models in ad-hoc networks uses protocols to discover and setup routes between nodes. Each device in a mobile ad-hoc network is free to move independently in any direction and will therefore change its links to other devices frequently. Mobility model represents the movement of mobile users and how there location, velocity and acceleration changes overtime. Various mobility models are proposed for ad-hoc networks and to facilitate communication within such networks routing protocols are used mainly AODV, DSR, FSR, TORA, DSDV, DYMO etc. Some of the popular mobility models are Random Way Point Model, Random Walk Model and Mobility Vector Model etc. Each model has its own characteristics, working capacity and limitations. In this paper we present the comparative of different protocols like AODV, DSDV and DSR for mobility models and considered that AODV delivers highest PDF(packet delivery fraction), NRL(Normalized Routing Load) and DSR delivers highest average end-to-end delay.

1. Shukla AK, Jha CK, Sharma D, The Efficiency Analysis of Mobility Model using Routing Protocols, International Journal of Computer Applications, 2012, pp. 6-10.
2. Ahmed F, Sajjadur RM, Performance Investigation on Two-Classes of MANET Routing Protocols Across Various Mobility models with QoS Constraints, International Journal of Computer Networks & Communications, 2011, 3(2), pp. 197-215.
3. Xavier PC, Christian B, Hannes H, Towards a Mobility Metric for Reproducible and Comparable Results in Ad Hoc Networks Research, MOBICOM 2003.
4. Aschenbruck N, Gerhards-Padilla E, Martini P, A Survey on mobility models for performance analysis in tactical mobile networks, Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology2/2008, pp. 54-61.
5. Santosh Kumar, Sharma SC, Suman B, Mobility Metrics Based Classification & Analysis of Mobility Model for Tactical Network, International Journal of Next-Generation Networks, 2010 2(3), pp. 39-51.
6. Heidemann J, Bulusu N, Elson J et-al, Effects of Detail in Wireless Network Simulation, SCS Communication Networks and Distributed System Modeling And Simulation Conference, 2000, pp. 1-10.
7. Basagni S, Chlamtac I, Syrotiuk VR, Woodward BA, Distance Routing Effect Algorithms for Mobility (DREAM), MOBICOM 1998, pp. 76-84.
8. Jayakumar G, Ganapathy G, Performance Comparison of Mobile Ad-hoc Network Routing Protocol, International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 2007, 7(11), pp. 77-84.
9. Ashokan R, Natarajan AM, An Approach for Reducing the End-to-end Delay and Increasing Network Lifetime in Mobile Ad hoc Networks, International Journal of Information Technology, 2007 4(2), pp. 121-127.
10. Jha RK, Limkar SV, Dr. Dalal UD, A Performance Comparison of Routing Protocols (DSR and TORA) for Security Issue in MANET (Mobile Ad Hoc Networks), International Journal of Computer Applications, Special Issue on "Mobile Ad-hoc Networks" MANETs, 2010, pp. 78-83.
11. KWAK BJ, SONG NO, MILLER LE, A Standard Measure of Mobility for Evaluating Mobile Ad Hoc Network Performance, IEICE TRANS. COMMUN. , 2003, E86-B(11), pp. 3236-3243.
12. Sunil Kumar, Mishra R, Krishna Kumar, Singh BM, An Inspection of Mobility Models Routine on Routing Protocols in Ad Hoc Network, International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT), 2013, 2(8), pp. 269-274.
13. Zhao M, Wang W, Analyzing Topology Dynamics in Ad Hoc Networks Using A Smooth Mobility Model, pp. 1-6.
14. Rafiq M, Manoj Kumar, Ahmed S, Comparative Analysis of Energy Efficient Routing Protocols in MANET, International Journal of Computer Applications, 2013, 82(5), pp. 1-6.
15. Shukla AK, Jha CK, Sharma D, An Estimation of Routing Protocols in Mobility Models Used for Ad Hoc Networks: Simulation Study, International Conference on Advances in Computer Application (ICACA-2013), Proceedings Published in International Journal of Computer Applications (IJCA) (975-8887), pp. 21-27.
16. Agarwal CP, Vyas OP, Tiwari MK, Evaluation of Varrying Mobility Models & Network Loads on DSDV Protocol of MANETs, International Journal on Computer Science and Engineering, 2009, 1(2),pp. 40-46.
17. Subramani A, Krishnan A, Node Mobility Tracking in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks in their Geographical Position (Dynamic Networks), International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering (IJSCE), ISSN: 2231-2307, 2011, 1(5), pp. 36-40.
18. Mohd. Usop NS, Abdullah A, Amri Abidin AF, Performance Evaluation of AODV, DSDV and DSR Routing Protocol in Grid Environment, IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 2009, 9(7),pp. 261-268.
19. Nand P, Dr. Sharma SC, Performance Study of Broadcast based Mobile Adhoc Routing Protocols AODV, DSR and DYMO, International Journal of Security and its Applications, 2011, 5(1), pp. 53-64.
20. Singh P, Bhola A, Jha CK, Simulation based Behavioral Study of AODV, DSR, OLSR and TORA Routing Protocols in Manet, International Journal of Computer Applications, 2013, 67(23), pp. 23-26.
21. Perkins, C. ; Belding-Royer, E. ; Das, S. Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing, 2003 IETF. RFC 3561. [https://tools. ietf. org/html/rfc3561]
22. Tonk G, Kashyap I, Tyagi SS, Performance Comparison of Ad-Hoc Network Routing Protocols using NS-2, International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE), 2012 1(1), pp. 53-57.

Ad-hoc Network Aodv Dsr Fsr Aodvuu Tora Dsdv Dymo Olsr Mobility Models.