CFP last date
20 January 2025
Reseach Article

Information Extraction from Clinical Text using NLP and Machine Learning: Issues and Opportunities

Published on August 2016 by M. Sridevi, Arunkumar B.r.
National Conference on “Recent Trends in Information Technology"
Foundation of Computer Science USA
NCRTIT2016 - Number 2
August 2016
Authors: M. Sridevi, Arunkumar B.r.
3c665d8a-2a08-4e3f-b291-a95b6527828f

M. Sridevi, Arunkumar B.r. . Information Extraction from Clinical Text using NLP and Machine Learning: Issues and Opportunities. National Conference on “Recent Trends in Information Technology". NCRTIT2016, 2 (August 2016), 11-16.

@article{
author = { M. Sridevi, Arunkumar B.r. },
title = { Information Extraction from Clinical Text using NLP and Machine Learning: Issues and Opportunities },
journal = { National Conference on “Recent Trends in Information Technology" },
issue_date = { August 2016 },
volume = { NCRTIT2016 },
number = { 2 },
month = { August },
year = { 2016 },
issn = 0975-8887,
pages = { 11-16 },
numpages = 6,
url = { /proceedings/ncrtit2016/number2/25588-1628/ },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Proceeding Article
%1 National Conference on “Recent Trends in Information Technology"
%A M. Sridevi
%A Arunkumar B.r.
%T Information Extraction from Clinical Text using NLP and Machine Learning: Issues and Opportunities
%J National Conference on “Recent Trends in Information Technology"
%@ 0975-8887
%V NCRTIT2016
%N 2
%P 11-16
%D 2016
%I International Journal of Computer Applications
Abstract

Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Machine Learning concepts are gaining rapid importance in the era of digitalization of data. The value of data keeps changing over time and makes it important to harness that value for performing in depth research in various domains. Extracting information from clinical text helps in automated terminology management, data mining, de-identification of clinical text, research subject identification and studying effect of research on them, predicting the onset and progress of various chronic diseases, disease-treatment-side effect analysis etc. Methods based on NLP and Machine Learning tends to perform better in this area but more experience is required to analyse clinical text than the biomedical literature. The issues and opportunities in information extraction from the clinical text need to be intensively reviewed to find new avenues in this domain of research.

References
  1. Peter B. Jensen, Lars J. Jensen &SorenBrunak, "Mining EHRs towards better research applications and clinical care", Nature Reviews Genetics, June 2012.
  2. Shortliffe EH, 1987. Computer programs to support clinical decision making.
  3. DunaDemner-Fushman, Wendy W. Chapman, Clement J. McDonald, "What can NLP do for Clinical Decision Support?", Journal of Biomedical Informatics, August 2009, Elsevier Inc.
  4. Sager N, Chi E, Friedman C, "The analysis and processing of clinical narrative", Medinfo;1986, Elsevier.
  5. Haug PJ, Ranum DL, Frederick PR, "Computerized extraction of coded findings from from free-text radio-logic reports", Radiology, February 1990.
  6. Haug PJ, Koehler S, Lau LM, Wang P, Rocha R, Huff SM, "Experience with a mixed semantic/ syntactic parser", Proceedings of Annual Symposium of Computational Appl. Med Care, 1995.
  7. Hobbs JR, "Information extraction from biomedical text", Journal of Biomed Information, August 2002.
  8. Pakhomov S, Buntrock J, Duffy PH, "High throughput modularized NLP system for clinical text", 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2005.
  9. Liu K, Mitchell KJ, Chapman WW, Crowley RS, "Automating tissue bank annotation from pathology reports – comparison to a gold standard expert annotation set", AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, 2005.
  10. Dorr DA, Phillips WF, Phansalkar S, Sims S A, Hurdle JF, "Assessing the difficulty and time cost of de-identification in clinical narratives", Methods Inf Med, 2006.
  11. Sweeney L, "Replacing personally-identifying information in medical records, the Scrub system, Proceedings of AMIA Annual Fall Symposium 1996.
  12. Ruch P, Baud RH, Rassinoux AM, BouillonnP, Robert G, "Medical document anonymization with a semantic lexicon", Proceedings of AMIA Symposium, 2000.
  13. Beckwith BA, Mahaadevan R, Balis UJ, Kuo F, "Development and evaluation of an open source software tool for de-identification of pathology reports", BMC Medical Informatics & Decision Making, 2006.
  14. Uzuner O, Luo Y, Szolovits P, "Evaluating the state-of-the-art in automatic de-identification", JAMIA 2007.
  15. Aronow DB, Fangfang F, Croft WB, "Ad hoc classification of radiology reports", JAMIA 1999.
  16. Mutalik PG, Deshpande A, Nadkarni PM, "Use of general purpose negation detection to augment concept indexing of medical documents: a quantitative study using UMLS, JAMIA 2001.
  17. Huang Y, Lowe HJ, "A novel hybrid approach to automated negation detection in clinical radiology reports", JAMIA 2007.
  18. Harkema H, Setzer A, Gaizauskas R, Hepple M, "Mining and modelling temporal clinical data", Proceedings of the UK e-Science All Hands Meeting 2005.
  19. Bramsen P, Deshpande P, Lee YK, Barzilay R, "Finding temporal order in discharge summaries", Proceedings of AMIA Annual Symposium 2006.
  20. Chapman W, Chu D, Dowing JN, "ConText: An algorithm for identifying contextual features from clinical text", BioNLP 2007: Biological, translational, and clinical language processing, Prague, CZ.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Natural Language Processing Machine Learning Clinical Text Information Extraction Electronic Health Records Viterbi Algorithm.