We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

Performance Improvement of ANN Classifiers using PSO

Published on March 2012 by Jayshri D.Dhande, D.R.Dandekar, S.L.Badjate
2nd National Conference on Innovative Paradigms in Engineering and Technology (NCIPET 2013)
Foundation of Computer Science USA
NCIPET - Number 7
March 2012
Authors: Jayshri D.Dhande, D.R.Dandekar, S.L.Badjate
e310406a-683b-4cd1-9cad-816ff43b90d9

Jayshri D.Dhande, D.R.Dandekar, S.L.Badjate . Performance Improvement of ANN Classifiers using PSO. 2nd National Conference on Innovative Paradigms in Engineering and Technology (NCIPET 2013). NCIPET, 7 (March 2012), 32-36.

@article{
author = { Jayshri D.Dhande, D.R.Dandekar, S.L.Badjate },
title = { Performance Improvement of ANN Classifiers using PSO },
journal = { 2nd National Conference on Innovative Paradigms in Engineering and Technology (NCIPET 2013) },
issue_date = { March 2012 },
volume = { NCIPET },
number = { 7 },
month = { March },
year = { 2012 },
issn = 0975-8887,
pages = { 32-36 },
numpages = 5,
url = { /proceedings/ncipet/number7/5244-1056/ },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Proceeding Article
%1 2nd National Conference on Innovative Paradigms in Engineering and Technology (NCIPET 2013)
%A Jayshri D.Dhande
%A D.R.Dandekar
%A S.L.Badjate
%T Performance Improvement of ANN Classifiers using PSO
%J 2nd National Conference on Innovative Paradigms in Engineering and Technology (NCIPET 2013)
%@ 0975-8887
%V NCIPET
%N 7
%P 32-36
%D 2012
%I International Journal of Computer Applications
Abstract

Data classification has been studied widely in the field of Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, data mining, and pattern recognition. Up to the present, the development of classification has made great achievements, and many kinds of classified technology and theory will continue to emerge. The aim of this paper is two fold. First, we present the experimental study of different Artificial Neural Networks classifiers for classification of radar returns from Ionosphere dataset and Bupa liver disorder dataset. Second, we propose a novel classification system based on particle swarm optimization (PSO) to improve the generalization performance of the SVM classifier. For this purpose, we have optimized the kernel parameters of SVM classifier. The experiments were conducted on Jonhs Hopkins Ionosphere dataset and Bupa Liver Disorder dataset. The comparison of different Neural Network classifiers and PSO-SVM is done based on Ionosphere dataset and Bupa Liver Disorder dataset from UCI machine learning repository. The results show that RBFNN typically provide better classification results. When comparing to techniques applied to binary classification problems. Also SVM Classifier with RBF kernel gives best classification accuracy on training set. And PSO-SVM classifier with optimized kernel parameter selection for classification of radar returns from ionosphere dataset and Bupa Liver Disorder gives better accuracy and improves the generalization performance.

References
  1. Tom M. Mitchell, “Machine Learning” McGraw-Hill.1997.
  2. Richard O. Duda, Peter E. Hart, Divid G. Stork, “pattern Classification”, second Edition, Wiley Interscience, October, 2000.
  3. Zhang Xuegogn,”Introduction to Statistical Learning Theory and Support vector machins”ACTA, Automatica Sinica, vol. 26, N0.1, Jan, 2000.
  4. J.M.Benitez, J.L.Csstro, I.Requena,”Are Artificial Neural Networks Black boxes?” IEEE transactions on neural networks, vol.8, no.5, September 1997.
  5. S Vince. „Applied Physics Laboratory „.Johns Hopkins University, Johns Hopkins Road, Laurel. MD 20723, John Hokins University Ionosphere database.1989.
  6. V G Sigillito ,S P Wing ,L V Hutton and K.B Baker.?Classification of Radar Returns from the Ionosphere using Neural Networks? Jonhs Hopkins APL Technical Digest ,vol 10,1989,pp 262-266.
  7. J Wenli, Z Huoji, LQizhong and Z Yiyu „Efficient Radar Target Classificafication using Modular Neural Networks?. Proceedings of International Conference on Radar .CIE2001,15-18 October 2001,p 1031.
  8. T M Conaghy, Leung, E Bosse and V Varadan.”Classification of Audio Radar signals using Radial Basis Function Neural Networks?.IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurements, vol 5, no 6 December 2003, pp. 1771.
  9. Farid Melgani ;”Classification of Electrocardiogram signals with supports vectors machines and particle swarm optimization” 2008 IEEE.
  10. J. Anitha, C. Kezi selva vijila and D.jude Hemanth; “Comparative Analysis of Genetic algorithm & particle swarm optimization techniques for SOFM based Abnormal Retinal Image classification” International journal of recent trends in Engineering, vol 2,No. 3,November 2009.
  11. Vapnik V.N. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, Springer, New York.1995.
  12. Kenned Y J, Eberhart R.”Particle Swarm Optimization “.IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks.Perth: IEEE Neural Network society, 1995, pp.1942.
  13. Ayat N.E., Cheriet M.,Suen C.Y “Automatic Model selection for the optimization of svm kernels”.Pattern Recognition, 2005,pp1733-1745
  14. Jayshri Dhande, D R Dandekar”Particle Swarm intelligence for Neural Network Classifier” International conference proceeding on Emerging Trends in Soft computing and ICT(SCICT-2011),G.G Vishwavidyalaya,Bilaspur(C.G)
  15. Jayshri Dhande, D R Dandekar “Design of Optimal Neural Networks and SVM Classifier for Classification of Radar Returns from Ionosphere” IFRSA?S International Journal of Computing, Vol.1Issue3, July, 2011
  16. Jayshri Dhande, D R Dandekar” PSO based SVM as an Optimal Classifier for Classification of Radar returns from Ionosphere”: International journal on Emerging Technologies (IJET), (ISSN NO. 0975-8364), Dec 2011
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Artificial Neural Network BPNN RBFNN SVM and Particle swarm Optimization (PSO)