CFP last date
20 January 2025
Call for Paper
February Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming February edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 January 2025

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
SFLA-Based Line Balancing and Task Optimization in Master-Slave Controlled Hanger Transportation Systems for Garment Production

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

A Survey:A Multiple Comparisons Algorithm based Ranking and Clustering of COCOMO and Putnam�s Software Cost Estimation Models

Published on December 2014 by Chetana D. Patil, Tareek M. Pattewar
journal_cover_thumbnail

National Conference on Emerging Trends in Computer Technology
Foundation of Computer Science USA
NCETCT - Number 1
December 2014
Authors: Chetana D. Patil, Tareek M. Pattewar
32c57e91-ecf3-4666-bdb5-b8a9556003e2

Chetana D. Patil, Tareek M. Pattewar . A Survey:A Multiple Comparisons Algorithm based Ranking and Clustering of COCOMO and Putnam�s Software Cost Estimation Models. National Conference on Emerging Trends in Computer Technology. NCETCT, 1 (December 2014), 10-13.

@article{
author = { Chetana D. Patil, Tareek M. Pattewar },
title = { A Survey:A Multiple Comparisons Algorithm based Ranking and Clustering of COCOMO and Putnam�s Software Cost Estimation Models },
journal = { National Conference on Emerging Trends in Computer Technology },
issue_date = { December 2014 },
volume = { NCETCT },
number = { 1 },
month = { December },
year = { 2014 },
issn = 0975-8887,
pages = { 10-13 },
numpages = 4,
url = { /proceedings/ncetct/number1/19078-4007/ },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Proceeding Article
%1 National Conference on Emerging Trends in Computer Technology
%A Chetana D. Patil
%A Tareek M. Pattewar
%T A Survey:A Multiple Comparisons Algorithm based Ranking and Clustering of COCOMO and Putnam�s Software Cost Estimation Models
%J National Conference on Emerging Trends in Computer Technology
%@ 0975-8887
%V NCETCT
%N 1
%P 10-13
%D 2014
%I International Journal of Computer Applications
Abstract

Software project can be completely predicting the most realistic effort using Software Cost Estimation. There are variety of methods and models trying to improve the estimation procedure of Software project development and application. From the variety of methods emerged the need for comparisons to determine the best model. Here, we propose a statistical framework based on a multiple comparisons algorithm in order to rank several cost estimation models, identifying those which have significant differences in accuracy, and clustering them in non overlapping groups. The proposed framework is applied in a large scale setup of comparing prediction models over datasets.

References
  1. M. Jorgensen and M. Shepperd, A Systematic Review of Software Development Cost Estimation Studies, IEEE Trans. Software Eng. ,vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 33-53, Jan. 2007.
  2. B. Kitchenham, S. MacDonell, L. Pickard, and M. Shepperd. What accuracy statistics really measure. IEEE Proc. SoftwareEng, vol. 148, pp. 81–85, June 2001.
  3. T. Foss, E. Stensrud, B. Kitchenham, and I. Myrtveit, A Simulation Study of the Model Evaluation Criterion MMRE,IEEE Trans. Software Eng. , vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 985-995, Nov. 2003.
  4. I. Myrtveit, E. Stensrud, and M. Shepperd, Reliability and Validity in Comparative Studies of Software Prediction Models, IEEE Trans. Software Eng. , vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 380-391, May 2005.
  5. A. Scott and M. Knott, A Cluster Analysis Method for Grouping Means in the Analysis of Variance, Biometrics, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 507-512, Sept. 1974.
  6. SwetaKumari, ShashankPushkar, Comparison ans Analysis of Different Cost Estimatoion Methods, IJACSA, vol. 4,no. 1,pp. 153-156, 2013.
  7. M. Shepperd and G. Kadoda, Comparing Software Prediction Techniques Using Simulation,IEEE Trans. Software Eng. , vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 1014-1022, Nov. 2001.
  8. N. Mittas and L. Angelis, Comparing Cost Prediction Models by Resampling Techniques, J. Systems and Software, vol. 81, no. 5, pp. 616-632, May 2008.
  9. ImanAttarzadeh and Siew Hock Ow,A Novel Algorithmic Cost Estimation Model Based on Soft Computing Technique, Department of Software Engineering, Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia,2010.
  10. Vahid Khatibi and Dayang N. A. Jawawi,Software Cost Estimation Methods: A Review,Faculty of Computer Science and Information System University Technology Malasia(UTM),JohorMalasia,vol. 2,no. 1,pp. 1-9,2010-11.
  11. Salvatore Alessandro Sarcia, Victor Robert Basili,GiovanniCantone, Scope Error Detection and Handling concerning Software Estimation Models, pp. 1-8.
  12. Efi Papatheocharous, Harris Papadopoulos and Andreas S. Andreou, Feature Subset Selection for Software Cost Modeling and Estimation, Department of Computer Science, pp. 1-5.
  13. N. Mittas and L. Angelis, Ranking and Clustering Software Cost Estimation Models through a Multiple Comparisons Algorithm, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 539-542, April 2013.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Project Estimation Effort Estimation Cost Models.