CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

The Role of Imaging Modalities in the Diagnosis of Parkinson�s disease

Published on September 2018 by Aziz Makandar, Rashmi Somshekhar
National Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology
Foundation of Computer Science USA
NCCSIT2017 - Number 1
September 2018
Authors: Aziz Makandar, Rashmi Somshekhar
6320c589-13c6-4228-aed4-3f784e580741

Aziz Makandar, Rashmi Somshekhar . The Role of Imaging Modalities in the Diagnosis of Parkinson�s disease. National Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology. NCCSIT2017, 1 (September 2018), 20-24.

@article{
author = { Aziz Makandar, Rashmi Somshekhar },
title = { The Role of Imaging Modalities in the Diagnosis of Parkinson�s disease },
journal = { National Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology },
issue_date = { September 2018 },
volume = { NCCSIT2017 },
number = { 1 },
month = { September },
year = { 2018 },
issn = 0975-8887,
pages = { 20-24 },
numpages = 5,
url = { /proceedings/nccsit2017/number1/29984-7016/ },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Proceeding Article
%1 National Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology
%A Aziz Makandar
%A Rashmi Somshekhar
%T The Role of Imaging Modalities in the Diagnosis of Parkinson�s disease
%J National Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology
%@ 0975-8887
%V NCCSIT2017
%N 1
%P 20-24
%D 2018
%I International Journal of Computer Applications
Abstract

The Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disease. It is characterized by the progressive loss of dopamine neurons in the substantia nigral which helps in managing all the body movements. There are four important symptoms of PD includes slow movement (bradykinesia), muscle stiffness (rigidity), postural instability and shaking (tremor) [1]. An increases amount of research is being done to detect the Parkinson disease at the early stages for early diagnoses and for proper treatment plan. There are many medical imaging modalities used to diagnosis PD like magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), functional imaging – which includes positron emission tomography (PET), single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and transcranial sonography. Each of these modalities provide a specific and unique aspect in detecting or identifying the disease. This review paper mainly focuses on the Brain functional imaging in the evaluation of Disease, current development of medical imaging modalities and its application in the diagnosis of PD.

References
  1. A. H. Schapira, Y. Agid, P. Barone, P. Jenner, M. R. Lemke, W. Poewe, O. Rascol, H. Reichmann, and E. Tolosa, "Perspective on recent advances in the understanding and treatment of Parkinson's disease," Eur. J. Neurology, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 1090–1099, 2009.
  2. Ene M (2008) Neural network-based approach to discriminate healthy people from those with Parkinson's disease. 35: 112-116.
  3. Alves G, Forsaa EB, Pedersen KF, Dreetz Gjerstad M, Larsen JP (2008) Epidemiology of Parkinson's disease. J Neurol 255 Suppl 5: 1832.
  4. Geng DY, Li YX, Zee CS (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging?based volumetric analysis of basal ganglia nuclei and substantia nigra in patients with Parkinson's disease. Neurosurgery. 58:256–262.
  5. Fahn S (1999) Parkinson disease, the effect of levodopa, and the ELLDOPA trial. Arch. Neurol. 56:529–535
  6. Sitburana O, Ondo WG (2009) Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in Parkinsonian disorders. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders 15:165–174.
  7. Beaulieu C (2002) The basis of anisotropic water diffusion in the nervous system ? a technical review. NMR Biomed. 15:435–455.
  8. Vaillancourt DE, Spraker MB, Prodoehl J, et al. (2009) High?resolution diffusion tensor imaging in the substantia nigra of de novo Parkinson disease. Neurology 72:1378–1384.
  9. Boelmans K, Bodammer NC, Suchorska B, Kaufmann J, Ebersbach G, Heinze HJ, Niehaus L (2010) Diffusion tensor imaging of the corpus callosum differentiates corticobasal syndrome from Parkinson?s disease. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders16: pp. 498–502.
  10. Nicoletti G, Lodi R, Condino F, et al. (2008) Apparent diffusion coefficient measurements of the middle cerebellar peduncle differentiate the Parkinson variant of MSA from Parkinson's disease and progressive supranuclear palsy. Mov Disord. 23:2370–2376.
  11. Berg D, Siefker C, Becker G (2001) Echogenicity of the substantia nigra in Parkinson's disease and its relation to clinical findings. J Neurol. 248:684–689.
  12. Berg D (2011) Substantia nigra hyperechogenicity is a risk marker of Parkinson?s disease: yes. J Neural Transm. Apr: 118(4):613?619.
  13. Walter U, Dressler D, Probst T, et al. (2007) Transcranial brain sonography findings in discriminating between parkinsonism and idiopathic Parkinson disease. Arch Neurol. 64:1635–1640.
  14. Berg D, Merz B, Reiners K, Naumann M, Becker G (2005) Five?year follow?up study of hyperecho genicity of the substantia nigra in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 20:383–385.
  15. Piccini P, Brooks DJ (2006) New Developments of Brain Imaging for Parkinson's Disease and Related Disorders. Mov Disord. 21:2035–2041.
  16. Brooks DJ, Pavese N. (2011) Imaging biomarkers in Parkinson's disease. Prog Neurobiol. 95(4):614?628.
  17. Benamer TS, Patterson J, Grosset DG, et al. (2000) Accurate differentiation of parkinsonism and essential tremor using visual assessment of [123I]?FPCIT imaging: The [123I]?FP?CIT Study Group. Mov Disord. 15:503–510.
  18. Parkinson Study Group (2000) A multicenter assessment of dopamine transporter imaging with DOPASCAN/SPECT in parkinsonism. Neurology 55:1540?1547.
  19. Felicio AC, Godeiro?Junior C, Shih MC, Borges V,Silva SM, Aguiar Pde C, et al. (2010) Evaluation of patients with clinically unclear Parkinsonian syndromes submitted to brain SPECT imaging using the technetium?99 m labelled tracer TRODAT?1. J Neurol. Sci. 291: 64–68.
  20. Jennings DL, Seibyl JP, Oakes D, Eberly S, Murphy J, Marek K (2004) (123I) beta?CIT and single?photon emission computed tomographic imaging vs. clinical evaluation in Parkinsonian syndrome: unmasking an early diagnosis. Arch Neurol. 61:1224–1229.
  21. Burn DJ, Sawle GV, Brooks D. J (1994) The differential diagnosis of Parkinson's disease, multiple system atrophy, and Steele?Richardson?Olszewski syndrome: discriminant analysis of striatal 18F?dopa PET data. J Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 57:278– 284.
  22. Pirker W, Asenbaum S, Bencsits G, et al. (2000) [I?123] beta?CIT SPECT in multiple system atrophy progressive supranuclear palsy, and corticobasal degeneration. Mov Disord. 15:1158–1167.
  23. Messa C, Volonte MA, Fazio F, et al. (1998) Differential distribution of striatal [123I]b?CIT in Parkinson's disease and progressive supranuclear palsy, evaluated with single?photon emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med. 25:1270–1276.
  24. Sawle GV, Brooks DJ, Marsden CD, Frackowiak RSJ (1991) Corticobasal degeneration: a unique pattern of regional cortical oxygen metabolism and striatal fluorodopa uptake demonstrated by positron emission tomography. Brain 114:541–556.
  25. Wang Y, Chan GL, Holden JE, et al. (1998) Agedependent decline of dopamine D1 receptors in human brain: a PET study. Synapse 30:56 – 61.
  26. Antonini A, Leenders KL, Vontobel P, et al. (1997) Complementary PET studies of striatal neuronal function in the differential diagnosis between multiple system atrophy and Parkinson's disease. Brain 120: 2187–2195.
  27. Brooks DJ, Ibanez V, Sawle GV, et al. (1992) Striatal D2 receptor status in patients with Parkinson's disease, striatonigral degeneration, and progressive supranuclear palsy, measured with 11C?raclopride and positron emission tomography. Ann Neurol. 31:184–192. 4 Int. j. integr. med. , 2013, Vol. 1, 11:2013 www. intechopen. com
  28. Eidelberg D (2009) Metabolic brain networks in neurodegenerative disorders: a functional imaging approach. Trends Neurosci. 32:548–557.
  29. Hirano S, Eckert T, Flanagan T, Eidelberg D (2009) Metabolic networks for assessment of therapy and diagnosis in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 24 (Suppl 2):S725–S731.
  30. Eidelberg D, Moeller JR, Dhawan V, et al. (1994) The metabolic topography of parkinsonism. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 14:783–801.
  31. Eckert T, Edwards C (2007) The application of network mapping in differential diagnosis of Parkinsonian disorders. Clin. Neurosci. Res. 6:359– 366.
  32. Treglia G, Stefanelli A, Giordano A (2011) Diagnostic performance of iodine?123?metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy in differential diagnosis between Parkinson's disease and multiple?system atrophy: A systematic review and a meta?analysis. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 113:823– 829.
  33. Druschky A, Hilz MJ, Platsch G,Radespiel?Troger M, Druschky K, Kuwert T, Neundorfer B(2000) Differentiation of Parkinson?s disease and multiple system atrophy in early disease stages by means of I?123?MIBG?SPECT. J Neurol Sci. 175(1):3?12.
  34. Yoshita, M (1998) Differentiation of idiopathic Parkinson?s disease from striatonigral degeneration and progressive supranuclear palsy using iodine?123 meta?iodobenzylguanidine myocardial scintigraphy J Neurol Sci. 155(1):60?67.
  35. Nagayama H, Hamamoto M, Ueda M, Nagashim J, Katayama Y (2005) Reliability of MIBG myocardial scintigraphy in the diagnosis of Parkinson?s disease J Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 76(2):249?251.
  36. Takatsu H, Nagashima K, Murase M, et al. (2000) Differentiating Parkinson disease from multiplesystem atrophy by measuring cardiac iodine?123metaiodobenzylguanidine accumulation. JAMA 284:44–45.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Parkinson Disease (pd) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mri) Positron Emission Tomography (pet) Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (spect) And Transcranial Sonography