CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

Comparative Analysis of 4-bit CMOS Multipliers

Published on None 2011 by Navdeep Goel, Lalit Garg
International Conference on VLSI, Communication & Instrumentation
Foundation of Computer Science USA
ICVCI - Number 4
None 2011
Authors: Navdeep Goel, Lalit Garg
4f4b441a-483c-49f8-abd5-dd0b6a561898

Navdeep Goel, Lalit Garg . Comparative Analysis of 4-bit CMOS Multipliers. International Conference on VLSI, Communication & Instrumentation. ICVCI, 4 (None 2011), 33-36.

@article{
author = { Navdeep Goel, Lalit Garg },
title = { Comparative Analysis of 4-bit CMOS Multipliers },
journal = { International Conference on VLSI, Communication & Instrumentation },
issue_date = { None 2011 },
volume = { ICVCI },
number = { 4 },
month = { None },
year = { 2011 },
issn = 0975-8887,
pages = { 33-36 },
numpages = 4,
url = { /proceedings/icvci/number4/2655-1247/ },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Proceeding Article
%1 International Conference on VLSI, Communication & Instrumentation
%A Navdeep Goel
%A Lalit Garg
%T Comparative Analysis of 4-bit CMOS Multipliers
%J International Conference on VLSI, Communication & Instrumentation
%@ 0975-8887
%V ICVCI
%N 4
%P 33-36
%D 2011
%I International Journal of Computer Applications
Abstract

A fast and energy-efficient multiplier is always needed in electronics industry especially digital signal processing (DSP), image processing and arithmetic units in microprocessors. Multiplier is such an important element which contributes substantially to the total power consumption of the system. Multipliers of various bit-widths are frequently required in VLSI from processors to application specific integrated circuits (ASICs). Recently reported logic style comparisons based on full-adder circuits claimed complementary pass transistor logic (CPL) to be much more power-efficient than complementary CMOS. However, new comparisons performed on more efficient CMOS circuit realizations and a wider range of different logic cells, as well as the use of realistic circuit arrangements demonstrate CMOS to be superior to CPL in most cases with respect to speed, area, power dissipation, and power-delay products. The most important and widely accepted metrics for measuring the quality of multiplier designs propagation delay, power dissipation and area. This paper describes the comparative performance of 4-bit multipliers designed using TANNER EDA, using different logic design styles.

References
  1. Chandrakasan, A., and Brodersen, Low Power Digital Design, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995.
  2. Weste, N., and Eshragian, K., Principles of CMOS VLSI Design: A Systems Perspective, Pearson Addison-Wesley Publishers, 2005.
  3. Bellaouar, A., and Elmasry, M., Low-Power Digital VLSI Design: Circuits and Systems Boston, Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic Publishers,1995.
  4. Sun, S., and Tsui, P., ―Limitation of CMOS supply-voltage scaling by MOSFET threshold voltage‖, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 30, pp. 947-949, 1995.
  5. Bisdounis, L., Gouvetas, D., and Koufopavlou, O., ―A comparative study of CMOS circuit design styles for low-power high-speed VLSI circuits‖, Int. J. of Electronics, vol. 84, no. 6, pp. 599-613,1998.
  6. Gupta, A., Design Explorations of VLSI Arithmetic Circuits, Ph.D. Thesis, BITS, Pilani, India, 2003.
  7. Yano, K., Yamanaka, T., Nishida, T., Saito, M., Shimohigashi, K., and Shimizu, A., ―A 3.8-ns CMOS 16-b multiplier using complementary pass-transistor logic‖, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 25, pp. 388-395, 1990.
  8. R4200 Microprocessor Product Information (Mountain view, California: MIPS Technologies Inc), MIPS Technologies, 1994.
  9. Psilogeorgopoulos, M., Chuang, T.S., Ivey, P.A., and Seed, L., Contemporary Techniques for Lower Power Circuit Design, PREST Deliverable D2.1, Tech Report, The Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Sheffield, 1998.
  10. Zimmermann, R., and Fichtner, W., ―Low-Power Logic Styles: CMOS versus Pass - Transistor Logic‖, IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuits, vol. 32, no. 7, July 1997.
  11. Suzuki, M., Ohkubo, N., Yamanaka, T., Shimizu, A., and Sasaki, K., ―A 1.5-ns 32-b CMOS ALU in double pass-transistor logic‖, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 28, pp. 1145-1151, 1993.
  12. Bellaouar, A., and Elmasry, M. I., Low-Power Digital VLSI Design: Circuits and Systems, Kluwer, Norwell, MA, 1995.
  13. Parhami, B., ―Computer Arithmetic – Algorithms and Hardware Designs‖, Oxford University Press, 2000.
  14. Rabaey, J.M., Chandrakasan, A., and Nikolic, B.,―Digital Integrated Circuits‖, Second Edition, PHI Publishers, 2003.
  15. Ware, F.A., McAllister, W.H., Carlson, J.R., Sun, D.K., and Vlach, R.J.,―64 Bit Monolithic Floating Point Processors‖, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 898-90, October 1982.
  16. Wallace, C.S., ―A Suggestion for a Fast Multiplier‖, IEEE Transactions on Electronic Computers, EC-13, pp. 14-17, 1964.
  17. Tanner EDA Inc. 1988, User‘s Manual, 2005.
  18. Najm, F., ―A survey of power estimation techniques in VLSI circuits‖, IEEE Transactions on VLSI Systems, vol. 2, pp. 446-455, 1995.
  19. Kang, S.,―Accurate simulation of power dissipation in VLSI circuits‖, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 21, pp. 889-891, 1986.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Multiplier CMOS Logic Design Style