We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

Incident Wave Models of Monopole Antenna on Perfectly Conducting Ground Plane

Published on June 2013 by Maifuz Ali, Seong-ook Park
International Conference on Communication, Circuits and Systems 2012
Foundation of Computer Science USA
IC3S - Number 3
June 2013
Authors: Maifuz Ali, Seong-ook Park
7f5d17de-e944-4a16-8aa2-b579e7d7bd35

Maifuz Ali, Seong-ook Park . Incident Wave Models of Monopole Antenna on Perfectly Conducting Ground Plane. International Conference on Communication, Circuits and Systems 2012. IC3S, 3 (June 2013), 1-3.

@article{
author = { Maifuz Ali, Seong-ook Park },
title = { Incident Wave Models of Monopole Antenna on Perfectly Conducting Ground Plane },
journal = { International Conference on Communication, Circuits and Systems 2012 },
issue_date = { June 2013 },
volume = { IC3S },
number = { 3 },
month = { June },
year = { 2013 },
issn = 0975-8887,
pages = { 1-3 },
numpages = 3,
url = { /proceedings/ic3s/number3/12295-1326/ },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Proceeding Article
%1 International Conference on Communication, Circuits and Systems 2012
%A Maifuz Ali
%A Seong-ook Park
%T Incident Wave Models of Monopole Antenna on Perfectly Conducting Ground Plane
%J International Conference on Communication, Circuits and Systems 2012
%@ 0975-8887
%V IC3S
%N 3
%P 1-3
%D 2013
%I International Journal of Computer Applications
Abstract

A few widely used incident wave models for antenna analysis are compared on the basis of antenna factor (AF) computations. The finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) technique is applied to compute the complex AF of monopole antenna placed on conduction ground plane in the receiving mode. The computed AFs are compared with published measured results.

References
  1. C. R. Paul, Introduction to Electromagnetic Compatibility. Wiley Series in Microwave and Optical Engineering, New York: Wiley, 1992.
  2. H. Hosoyama, T. Iwasaki, and S. Ishigami, "Complex Antenna Factor of a V-Dipole Antenna with Two Coaxial Feeders for Field Measurements," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 154 – 158, May 1999.
  3. W. Yu and R. Mittra, CFDTD: Conformal Finite-Difference Time-Domain Maxwell's Equations Solver: Software and User's Guide. Boston,London: Artech House, 2004.
  4. S. Ishigami, H. Iida, and T. Iwasaki, "Measurements of Complex Antenna Factor by the Near-Field 3-Antenna Method," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 424–432, Aug. 1996.
  5. Dennis M. Sullivan, Electromagnetic Simulation Using The FDTD Method. New York: IEEE Press, 2000.
  6. D. M. Sullivan, "An unsplit step 3-D PML for use with the FDTD method," IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 184 – 186, Jul. 1997.
  7. Allen Taflove and Susan C. Hagness, Computational Electromagnetic-The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method. Boston London: Artech House, 2005.
  8. T. Iwasaki and K. Tomizawa, "Systematic Uncertainties of the Complex Antenna Factor of a Dipole Antenna as Determined by Two Methods," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 234–245, May 2004.
  9. W. Joseph and L. Martens, "An Improved Method to Determine the Antenna Factor," IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 252–257, Feb. 2005.
  10. R. M. Hekert, J. K. Daher, K. P. Ray, and B. Subbarao, "Measurement and Modeling of Near and Far field Antenna Factor," in International Conference on Electromagnetic Compatibility and Interference (INCEMIC'1994), Aug. 1994, pp. 237–241.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Antenna Factor Fdtd Gain Monopole Antenna Ground Plane