In this paper we present a proposal of designing learning activities to dynamically provide thematic web resources enriched with linked data from a semantic repository. The approach has been implemented as a tool for Learning Activity Management System (LAMS) that provides an interface to automatically select the related resources that are to be delivered to students running a learning activity. It also enables teachers to share a variable set of learning resources and applications related to a given subject and postpone the resource delivery to the deployment or enactment of the course.

1. De la Fuente, L., Miao, Y., Pardo, A., Delgado, C. 2008. A supporting architecture for generic service integration in IMS Learning Design, in Proc. of EC-TEL, pp. 467-473
2. Dalziel, J. 2003. Implementing Learning Design: The Learning Activity Management System (LAMS), in Proc. of 20th ASCILITE, Adelaide, Australia, pp. 593-596
3. Ellis, R. K. (ed.) 2009. A field guide to Learning Management Systems, Tech. Report., Learning Circuits, American Society for Training & Development
4. Yueh, H. P. & Hsu, S. 2008. Designing a learning management system to support instruction. Communications of the ACM, 51(4), 59-63
5. Devedzic, V.; Jovanovic, J.; Gasivic, D. 2007. The pragmatics of e-learning standards, IEEE Internet Computing, May-June, 19-27
6. Geser, G. 2002. Open Educational Practices and Resources. OLCOS Roadmap 2012. Tech. Report, Salzburg Research
7. Torres, J., Cárdenas, C., Dodero, J. M., Juárez, E. 2010. Educational Modelling Languages and Service-Oriented Learning Process Engines, In Advanced Learning Processes, In M. B. Rosson (Ed.) InTech Pub, Vienna, Austria
8. Olivier, B., Tattersall, C. 2005. The learning design specification. In R. Koper, and C. Tattersall (Eds.), Learning design. A handbook on modelling and delivering networked education and training, Springer, pp. 21-40
9. Vogten, H., Martens, H., Nadolski, R., Tattersall, C., van Rosmalen, P., Koper, R. 2007. CopperCore Service Integration, Interactive Learning Environments, 15 (2), pp. 171-180
10. Dagger, D., O'Connor, A., Lawless, S., Walsh, E., Wade, V. P. 2007. Service-oriented e-learning platforms: From monolithic systems to flexible services, IEEE Internet Computing 11(3), pp. 28–35
11. Wilson, S., Liber, O., Jonhson, M., Beauvoir, P., Sharples, P., Milligan, C. 2007. Personal Learning Environments. Challenging the dominant design of educational systems, Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 3(2), pp. 27-38
12. Briscoe, G. and De Wilde, P. 2006. Digital Ecosystems: Evolving service-oriented architectures. In Proc. of Conf. on Bio Inspired Models of Network, Information and Computing Systems. IEEE Press
13. Dodero, J. M., Ghiglione, E. 2008. ReST-based web access to learning design services, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 1(3), 190-195
14. Conde, M.A., del Pozo, A., García-Peñalvo, F. J. 2011. Moodle 2.0, Nuevas oportunidades de aprendizaje basadas en servicios eLearning, Avances en Ingeniería del Software Aplicada al E-Learning, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, pp. 71-86
15. Dodero, J. M., Ghiglione, E., Torres, J. 2010. Engineering the life-cycle of semantic services-enhanced learning systems, International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 20(4), 499-519
16. Ebner, M., Klamma, R., Schaffert, S. 2009. Mashups for Learning, International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 5(1), 4-6
17. Cornejo, C. M, Ruiz-Rube, I., Dodero, J. M. 2011. Semantic Management of Digital Contents for the Cultural Domain, in Recent Trends in Information Reuse and Integration, Springer, Berling Heidelberg [to be published]

Learning design LMS integration LAMS Linked-data