The week's pick
Reseach Article
Science Learning Object Design: an experimental comparison between instructional content formats
| Design and Evaluation of Digital Content for Education |
| Foundation of Computer Science USA |
| DEDCE - Number 1 |
| None 2011 |
| Authors: Fabio Serenelli, Enrico Ruggeri, Paolo Ferri |
| ff19dffa-c78a-49c4-a069-0f95219ad99d |
Fabio Serenelli, Enrico Ruggeri, Paolo Ferri . Science Learning Object Design: an experimental comparison between instructional content formats. Design and Evaluation of Digital Content for Education. DEDCE, 1 (None 2011), 15-20.
Abstract
The Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning provides useful principles for Instructional Content Design. Meanwhile there is a lack of evidence about efficacy of these principles with children and adolescents in scholar context. In order to evaluate how the use of infographics, animations and interactivity could improve learning performance, we arranged an experimental study involving 360 children from 16 Uruguayan classrooms. The main purpose of this paper is to describe the authoring and design process that we followed in order to produce the 3 learning object formats which were used for the tests (Infographic Resume, Step by Step Multimedia, Learning-Game).
References
- Mosley, P. 2005. A taxonomy for learning object technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 702-703.
- Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science 12 (2): 257–285.
- Serenelli, F., Mangiatordi, A. 2010. The 'One Laptop Per Child' XO laptop as a PLE: a cognitive artifact beyond hardware and software, PLE Conference proceedings, Cornellá, Barcelona.
- Mangiatordi, A., Pischetola, M. 2010. Sustainable Innovation Strategies in Education: OLPC Case Studies in Ethiopia and Uruguay. IM. Lytras et al., Organizational, Business, and Technological Aspects of the Knowledge Society, pages 94-104, Springer.
- Merrill, M. D. 2002. A pebble-in-the-pond model for instructional design. Performance Improvement. 41(7), 39-44.
- Mayer, R. E. 2005. Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (p. 31–48). Cambridge University Press.
- Merrill, M. D. 2009. First Principles of Instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth & A. Carr-Chellman Alison (Eds.), Instructional design Theories And Models Vol 3 Building A Common Knowledge Base (Vol. III, pp. 1-19). Rutledge.
- Mammarella, N., Cornoldi, C., Pazzaglia, F. (2005). Psicologia dell’apprendimento multimediale. Il Mulino.
- Beilin, H. 1992. Piaget's enduring contribution to developmental psychology. Developmental Psychology, 28, 191-204.
- Merrill, M. D. 1994. Instructional Design Theory. course syllabus (p. 484). Educational Technology Publication.
- Clark, R. C. 2007. Developing technical training: a structured approach for developing ... (p. 269). John Wiley and Sons.
- Mayer, R. E., Chandler, P. 2001. When learning is just a click away: Does simple user interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages?, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol 93(2), Jun, 390-397.
- Clark, R. C., Mayer, R. E. 2003. E-Learning and the Science of Instruction. Jossey-Bass Pfeiffer, San Francisco.
- Clark, R. E. 2003. What Works in Distance Learning: Instructional Strategies. In H. F. O'Neil (Ed.), What Works In Distance Learning (pg. 26). Los Angeles: Center for the Study of Evaluation.
- Merrill, M. D. 2007. First principles of instruction: a synthesis. In Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology, 2nd Edition. R. A. Reiser and J. V. Dempsey. Upper Saddle River, NJ, Merrill/Prentice Hall. 2, pp. 62-71.
Index Terms
Keywords