The literature in educational research has established that monitoring student learning is a crucial component of high quality education. When instructors and students are not in a face-to-face traditional environment, new forms of student monitoring must be explored. The effective use of CMS requires that instructors have been provided with appropriate means of diagnosing problems so that they can take immediate actions to prevent or overcome those situations. The aim of this paper is to present an analysis of an Object Oriented Programming course supported by a Moodle platform. Therefore, we have carried out the mining of an eLearning database and represented the more relevant results by depicting them a visualization based on the tag cloud visual representation.

1. Thomas, J. J., and Cook, K. A. 2005. The Science of Analytical Reasoning. In Illuminating the Path: The Research and Development Agenda for Visual Analytics, 33-68. IEEE.
2. Estefan, J. A., Laskey, K., McCabe, F. G., and Thornton, D. 2008. Reference Architecture for Service Oriented Architecture Version 1.0, OASIS. http://docs.oasis-open.org/soa-rm/soa-ra/v1.0/soa-ra-pr-01.pdf.
3. Conde González, M. Á., García Peñalvo, F. J., Casany Guerrero, Mª J., and Alier Forment, M. 2009. Adapting LMS architecture to the SOA: an Architectural Approach, In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Internet and Web Applications and Services – ICIW 2009, Venice/Mestre, Italy, 322-327.
4. Dougiamas, M., and Taylor, P. 2003. Moodle: Using Learning Communities to Create an Open Source Course Management System. In D. Lassner and C. McNaught (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2003. 171-178. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
5. Wilson, B. G. 1996. Constructivist Learning Environments: Case Studies in Instructional Design. Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology Publications.
6. Muñoz-Organero, M., Muñoz-Merino, P. J., and Kloos, C. D. 2010. Student Behavior and Interaction Patterns with an LMS as Motivation Predictors in E-Learning Settings., IEEE Transactions on Education, 53, 463-470.
7. Bateman, S., Gutwin, C., and Nacenta, M. 2008. Seeing things in the clouds: the effect of visual features on tag cloud selections. In Proceedings of the nineteenth ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia, 193-202.
8. Viégas, F. B., and Wattenberg, M. 2008. Tag clouds and the case for vernacular visualization. Interactions, 15, 49-52.
9. Modjeska, D. 1997. Navigation in Electronic Worlds: Research Review for Depth Oral Exam. University of Toronto. Department of Computer Science. http://www.dgp.toronto.edu/people/modjeska/Pubs/lit_rvw.pdf.
10. European Ministers of Education. 1999. The European Higher Education Area - Bologna Declaration, Bologna on the 19th of June 1999.
11. OMG. 2010. OMG Unified Modeling Language Specification. Version 2.3. Object Management Group Inc. http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.3/.
12. Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I., and Booch, G. 2005. The Unified Modeling Language. Reference Manual. 2nd Edition, Addison-Wesley.
13. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., and Vlissides, J. 1995. Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley.
14. Buschmann, F., Meunier, R., Rohnert, H., Sommerlad, P., Stal, M. 1996. Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture, Volume 1: A System of Patterns. John Wiley & Sons.
15. Fernández, E., and Williamson, D. M. 2003. Using Project-Based Learning to Teach Object Oriented Application Development. In Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Information Technology Curriculum, CITC4 ‘03, 37-40.
16. Farrell, S., and Lau, T. 2006. Fringe Contacts: People-Tagging for the Enterprise. In Proceedings of the WWW 2006 Collaborative Web Tagging Workshop.

Object Oriented Programming Visualization eLearning Timeline Tagcloud Moodle