We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

Performance Analysis of IPv4 v/s IPv6 in Virtual Environment using UBUNTU

Published on Decmber 2011 by Savita Shiwani, G.N. Purohit, Naveen Hemrajani
International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks CSI-COMNET-2011
Foundation of Computer Science USA
COMNET - Number 1
Decmber 2011
Authors: Savita Shiwani, G.N. Purohit, Naveen Hemrajani
79ccdb3a-410a-46cf-b068-8fb0c7a787cb

Savita Shiwani, G.N. Purohit, Naveen Hemrajani . Performance Analysis of IPv4 v/s IPv6 in Virtual Environment using UBUNTU. International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks CSI-COMNET-2011. COMNET, 1 (Decmber 2011), 86-91.

@article{
author = { Savita Shiwani, G.N. Purohit, Naveen Hemrajani },
title = { Performance Analysis of IPv4 v/s IPv6 in Virtual Environment using UBUNTU },
journal = { International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks CSI-COMNET-2011 },
issue_date = { Decmber 2011 },
volume = { COMNET },
number = { 1 },
month = { Decmber },
year = { 2011 },
issn = 0975-8887,
pages = { 86-91 },
numpages = 6,
url = { /proceedings/comnet/number1/5428-1016/ },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Proceeding Article
%1 International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks CSI-COMNET-2011
%A Savita Shiwani
%A G.N. Purohit
%A Naveen Hemrajani
%T Performance Analysis of IPv4 v/s IPv6 in Virtual Environment using UBUNTU
%J International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks CSI-COMNET-2011
%@ 0975-8887
%V COMNET
%N 1
%P 86-91
%D 2011
%I International Journal of Computer Applications
Abstract

The IPv4 address space is about to vanish. Networks will need to transition to IPv6, which allows for larger address space however it has limitations that hinder its growth. IPv6 addresses inherent problems in the earlier version protocol and it provides new opportunities too. However, due to the increased overhead in IPv6 and its interaction with the operating system that hosts this communication protocol, there may be network performance issues. This paper will focus on the considerations that affect network performance analysis for IPv4 and IPv6 based networks for ubuntu10.0.4 open source Linux based Operating System deployed on top of a virtual infrastructure. Here, ubuntu is configured with the two versions of IP and empirically evaluated for performance difference. Performance related metrics like throughput, delay, and jitter are measured on a test-bed implementation.

References
  1. M.K.Sailan, R.Hassan and A.Patel, “A Comparative Review of IPv4 and IPv6 for Research Test Bed,” in .ICEEI’09, 2009, NW-05, p.427.
  2. M.K.Sailan, R.Hassan, ”Design of Accurate End-to-End IPv4 and IPv6 Performance Test” in ATUR09, 2009.
  3. http://code.google.com/p/xjperf/
  4. Deering, S., and Hinder, ”Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification.”RFC 2460, December 1998
  5. “The Design and Implementation of an IPv6/IPv4 Network Address and Protocol Translator” ” Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195 http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~mef/research/napt/reports/usenix98/
  6. Ioan Raicu “IPv6 Performance Results”, cs.wayne.edu
  7. Yi Wang 1, Shaozhi Ye 2, Xing Li, “Understanding Current IPv6 Performance: A Measurement Study”, 3 Department of Electronic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P. R. China http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/ISCC.2005.151
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

IPv4 IPv6 Performance Analysis Ubuntu Virtual TCP Bandwidth Jitter