CFP last date
20 January 2025
Reseach Article

Spam Email Detection using Structural Features

by Sarju S, Riju Thomas, Emilin Shyni C
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 89 - Number 3
Year of Publication: 2014
Authors: Sarju S, Riju Thomas, Emilin Shyni C
10.5120/15485-4265

Sarju S, Riju Thomas, Emilin Shyni C . Spam Email Detection using Structural Features. International Journal of Computer Applications. 89, 3 ( March 2014), 38-41. DOI=10.5120/15485-4265

@article{ 10.5120/15485-4265,
author = { Sarju S, Riju Thomas, Emilin Shyni C },
title = { Spam Email Detection using Structural Features },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { March 2014 },
volume = { 89 },
number = { 3 },
month = { March },
year = { 2014 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 38-41 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume89/number3/15485-4265/ },
doi = { 10.5120/15485-4265 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T22:08:19.413439+05:30
%A Sarju S
%A Riju Thomas
%A Emilin Shyni C
%T Spam Email Detection using Structural Features
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 89
%N 3
%P 38-41
%D 2014
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

In recent years, we have witnessed a dramatic raise in the use of web and thus email becomes an inevitable mode of communication. This is the scenario where the attackers take advantage by the mode of spam mails to the email users and misguide them to some phished sites or the users unwittingly install some malwares to their machine. This shows the importance of research activities being carried out in the field of spam mail detection. In this paper we tend to project a replacement methodology to segregate spam emails from non-spam (legitimate) emails using the distinct structural features available in them. The experiments with 8000 emails show that that our methodology preserves an accuracy of the spam detection up to 99. 4% with at the most 0. 6 % false positives.

References
  1. S. Abu-Nimeh, D. Nappa, X Wang, S. Nair, "A comparison of machine learning techniques for phishing detection. " In Proceedings of the anti-phishing working groups 2nd annual eCrime researchers summit, pp. 60-69. ACM, 2007.
  2. Apache James Mime4, http://james. apache. org/mime4j/
  3. L . Breiman, "Random Forests. ," InMachine Learning,Vol 45 No. 1,pp. 5–32,2001.
  4. X. Carreras,L. Marquez and J. G Salgado ,"Boosting trees for anti spam filtering," In International conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, , 2001,pp. 58-64.
  5. J Clark, I Koprinska, J Poon," A neural network based approach to automated e-mail classification," In Web Intelligence, 2003. WI 2003. Proceedings. IEEE/WIC International Conference on, pp. 702-705. 2003.
  6. I Fette, N Sadeh, A Tomasic, "Learning to detect phishing emails. " Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 2007.
  7. G . Forman, "An extensive empirical study of feature selection metrics for text classification. ,"InThe Journal of machine learning research,pp. 1289-1305,2003.
  8. Y. Freund , R. E. Schapire, "A Short Introduction to Boosting. ,"1999.
  9. Kaspersky Spam Trends and Statistics Report ( 2013), http://www. securelist. com/en/analysis/204792297/Spam_in_Q2_2013
  10. S. Kiritchenko,S. Matwin,SAbu-Hakima. "Email Classification with Temporal Features," In Intelligent Information Systems,2004,pp. 523-533
  11. M . Rathi, V. Pareek, "Spam Mail Detection through Data Mining-A Comparative Performance Analysis. ," InInternational Journal of Modern Education & Computer ScienceVol 5 No. 12,2013.
  12. M. Sahami, S. Dumasi, D. Heckerman, and E. Horvitz, "A Bayesian approach to filtering junk e- mail: In Learning for text categorization," InInternational Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science (IJMECS), Vol. 5 No. 12,pp. 31-39,1998.
  13. S. Shankar and G. Karypis, "Weight adjustment schemes for a centroid based classifier," Computer Science Technical Report TR00-035, 2000.
  14. B. Thomas, and P. Richard, "An Essay towards solving a Problem in the Doctrine of Chance. By the late Rev. Mr. Bayes, communicated by Mr. Price, in a letter to John Canton, A. M. F. R. S. ," InPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of LondonVol 53 No. 0,pp. 370–418,1763.
  15. L Zhang, J Zhu, T Yao," An evaluation of statistical spam filtering techniques. ," In ACM Transactions on Asian Language Information Processing (TALIP) Vol 3, No. 4,pp. 243-269,2004.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Spam Detection Structural Feature Selection spam classification Machine learning application.