CFP last date
20 January 2025
Reseach Article

A Typical Approach in Conceptual and Embodiment Design of Foldable Bicycle

by Arunachalam M, Arun Prakash R, Rajesh R
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 87 - Number 19
Year of Publication: 2014
Authors: Arunachalam M, Arun Prakash R, Rajesh R
10.5120/15458-4031

Arunachalam M, Arun Prakash R, Rajesh R . A Typical Approach in Conceptual and Embodiment Design of Foldable Bicycle. International Journal of Computer Applications. 87, 19 ( February 2014), 9-16. DOI=10.5120/15458-4031

@article{ 10.5120/15458-4031,
author = { Arunachalam M, Arun Prakash R, Rajesh R },
title = { A Typical Approach in Conceptual and Embodiment Design of Foldable Bicycle },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { February 2014 },
volume = { 87 },
number = { 19 },
month = { February },
year = { 2014 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 9-16 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume87/number19/15458-4031/ },
doi = { 10.5120/15458-4031 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T22:06:20.333029+05:30
%A Arunachalam M
%A Arun Prakash R
%A Rajesh R
%T A Typical Approach in Conceptual and Embodiment Design of Foldable Bicycle
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 87
%N 19
%P 9-16
%D 2014
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

The Conceptual design and Embodiment design are two of the important stages in a typical product design and development process. This study aims at generating different concepts for a foldable bicycle product using a systematic concept generation method and the best generated concepts have been selected using various concept selection methods. It also describes a systemic approach to material selection and FEA justify during embodiment design phase. Various design concepts have been generated from a range of available possible solutions to each product function by morphological matrix which was developed based on functions tree. The Pugh chart and numerical concept selection methods have been employed to select the best concepts that have been generated based on a set of criteria. In the Embodiment design phase, the Ashby method has been used for material selection for the selected design concept. The human comfort has been checked by Digital Human Modeling (DHM) Technology. In addition to the material selection process, the proposed design of the foldable bicycle has also been analyzed for its safety by FEA and Fatigue analysis.

References
  1. Nishimura et al, "Foldable bicycle frame", United States patent, Japan, 4/1986, 4579360.
  2. Beech, "Foldable exercise cycle", United States patent, United States, 11/1986, 4632386.
  3. Chiu, "Mini Foldable cycle", United States patent, New York, 4/1989, 4824130.
  4. Huppe, "Bicycle with universal adjustable frame", United States patent, Florida, USA, 7/1990, 5072961.
  5. Ching-Tsung yeh, "Foldable bicycle", United States patent, china, 3/1995, 5398955.
  6. Herder, "Foldable bicycle frame", United States patent, Australia, 3/2000, 6032971.
  7. Ibarra, "Skateboard-bicycle combination", United States patent, CA (US), 6/2001, US 6250656 B1.
  8. Sanders, "Foldable cycle", United States patent, Windsor, UK, 9/2007, US 7264257 B2.
  9. Yi-Cheng Lin, "Structure for laterally moving a folded folding bicycle", United States patent application publication, Taichung, 8/2010, US 2010/0253040 A1.
  10. Zane et al, "Clamp for holding bicycle lock", United States patent, Boston, 4/1988, 4736921.
  11. Jeng, "Joint for a bicycle frame", United States patent, Taiwan, 2/1990, 4902160.
  12. Pan, "Foldable frame member for a foldable bicycle", United States patent, Taiwan, 2/1996, 5492350.
  13. Kevin Otto and Kristin wood, Product design-Techniques in reverse engineering and new product development, Pearson Education, India, 2006.
  14. Yousef Haik, Engineering Design Process, Cengage Learning, India, 1997.
  15. Debkumar chakrabarti, Indian anthropometric dimensions for ergonomics design practice India, National Institute of design, India, 1999,ISBN 81-86199-15-0.
  16. Lambros laios and John giannatsis, "Ergonomic evaluation and redesign of children bicycle based on anthropometric data", Applied Ergonomics 41(2010) 428-435.
  17. Forrest dwyer, Adrian Shaw and Richard Tombarelli, "Material and design optimization for an aluminium bike frame", Worcester polytechnic institute, 4/2012.
  18. M. F Ashby, "Material, Bicycle and Design", Edward demile Campbell memorial lecture ASM international, USA, 1994.
  19. Michael F. Ashby, Material selection in mechanical design-4th edition, Elsevier publication, India, 2011.
  20. J. Sanjog, S. Karmakar, H. Agarwal, and C. D patail, "Deigning and Ergonomic evaluation of a shoe-rack in CAD environment", International journal of computer applications (0975-8887), Vol. 49, no. 20, pp. 38-41, 2012.
  21. Kuhn, Howard, and Dana Medlin. "Mechanical Testing and Evaluation". Materials Park, OH: ASM International, 2000. Print.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Conceptual design Pugh chart Embodiment design Ashby material selection DHM and FEA analysis.