We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

Impact of Delay and PDR on Video Transmission H.264/SVC in Dense and Sparse Topologies over Ad Hoc Networks

by John Petearson Anzola, andres Camilo Jimenez, Luis Alejandro Caycedo
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 87 - Number 13
Year of Publication: 2014
Authors: John Petearson Anzola, andres Camilo Jimenez, Luis Alejandro Caycedo
10.5120/15271-3895

John Petearson Anzola, andres Camilo Jimenez, Luis Alejandro Caycedo . Impact of Delay and PDR on Video Transmission H.264/SVC in Dense and Sparse Topologies over Ad Hoc Networks. International Journal of Computer Applications. 87, 13 ( February 2014), 34-41. DOI=10.5120/15271-3895

@article{ 10.5120/15271-3895,
author = { John Petearson Anzola, andres Camilo Jimenez, Luis Alejandro Caycedo },
title = { Impact of Delay and PDR on Video Transmission H.264/SVC in Dense and Sparse Topologies over Ad Hoc Networks },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { February 2014 },
volume = { 87 },
number = { 13 },
month = { February },
year = { 2014 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 34-41 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume87/number13/15271-3895/ },
doi = { 10.5120/15271-3895 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T22:05:51.363249+05:30
%A John Petearson Anzola
%A andres Camilo Jimenez
%A Luis Alejandro Caycedo
%T Impact of Delay and PDR on Video Transmission H.264/SVC in Dense and Sparse Topologies over Ad Hoc Networks
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 87
%N 13
%P 34-41
%D 2014
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

This article focuses on the analysis of the two most widespread protocols of ad hoc network routing: Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) and Dynamic Source Routing (DSR), both of them popular, scalable, and reactive routing protocols. It analyzes and compares their performance in H. 264/SVC video transmission using NS2 simulation and integration with myEvalSVC, analyzing the provision of Quality of Service (QoS) metrics of Delay End to End and Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR), maintaining the network size unchanged but varying the speed of each node. We will observe the behavior of these routing protocols in two types of topology: Dense and Sparse. It seems that the topology significantly influence the provision of QoS in the transmission of H. 264/SVC video on a system with a medium access control scheme by using the Distributed Coordination Function (DCF).

References
  1. C. Bettstetter. On the connectivity of wireless multihop networks with homogeneous and inhomogeneous range assignment. In Vehicular Technology Conference, 2002. Proceedings. VTC 2002-Fall. 2002 IEEE 56th, volume 3, pages 1706–1710 vol. 3, 2002.
  2. Rajesh Deshmukh and Asha Ambhaikar. Article: Performance evaluation of aodv and dsr with reference to network size. International Journal of Computer Applications, 11(8):27–32, December 2010. Published By Foundation of Computer Science.
  3. Video Traces Research Group. Yuv 4:2:0 video sequences. http://trace. eas. asu. edu/yuv/index. html, 7 2013.
  4. D. Johnson, Y. Hu, and D. Maltz. The Dynamic Source Routing Protocol (DSR) for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks for IPv4. RFC 4728 (Experimental), February 2007.
  5. C. H. Ke. myEvalSVC: an Integrated Simulation Framework for Evaluation of H. 264/SVC Transmission. KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems (TIIS), 6(1):377–392, 2012.
  6. James Nightingale, Qi Wang, and Christos Grecos. Real-time video streaming using h. 264 scalable video coding (svc) in multihomed mobile networks: a testbed approach, 2011.
  7. C. Perkins, E. Royer, and S. Das. RFC 3561 Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing. Technical report, 2003.
  8. C. E. Perkins. Ad hoc networking. Addison-Wesley networking: mobile computing. Addison-Wesley, 2001.
  9. E. M. Royer, P. M. Melliar-Smith, and L. E. Moser. An analysis of the optimum node density for ad hoc mobile networks. In Communications, 2001. ICC 2001. IEEE International Conference on, volume 3, pages 857–861 vol. 3, 2001.
  10. E. M. Royer and Chai-Keong Toh. A review of current routing protocols for ad hoc mobile wireless networks. Personal Communications, IEEE, 6(2):46–55, 1999.
  11. Heiko Schwarz, Detlev Marpe, and Thomas Wiegand. Overview of the scalable video coding extension of the h. 264/avc standard. In IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology in Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, pages 1103–1120, 2007.
  12. A. Tuteja, R. Gujral, and S. Thalia. Comparative performance analysis of dsdv, aodv and dsr routing protocols in manet using ns2. In Advances in Computer Engineering (ACE), 2010 International Conference on, pages 330–333, 2010.
  13. ITU (International Telecommunication Union). Recommendation 500-10: Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures. ITU-R Rec. BT. 500, 2000.
  14. Zhuo Zhao and Ping Liang. A statistical analysis of h. 264/avc fme mode reduction. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Techn. , 21(1):53–61, 2011.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

AODV DSR H. 264/SVC Dense and Sparse Topology