CFP last date
20 January 2025
Call for Paper
February Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming February edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 January 2025

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
SFLA-Based Line Balancing and Task Optimization in Master-Slave Controlled Hanger Transportation Systems for Garment Production

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Real-Time Traffic-Differentiated QoS Routing for Wireless Sensor Networks

by Shiva Prakash T, Raja K B, Venugopal K R
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 87 - Number 10
Year of Publication: 2014
Authors: Shiva Prakash T, Raja K B, Venugopal K R
10.5120/15242-3787

Shiva Prakash T, Raja K B, Venugopal K R . Real-Time Traffic-Differentiated QoS Routing for Wireless Sensor Networks. International Journal of Computer Applications. 87, 10 ( February 2014), 6-13. DOI=10.5120/15242-3787

@article{ 10.5120/15242-3787,
author = { Shiva Prakash T, Raja K B, Venugopal K R },
title = { Real-Time Traffic-Differentiated QoS Routing for Wireless Sensor Networks },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { February 2014 },
volume = { 87 },
number = { 10 },
month = { February },
year = { 2014 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 6-13 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume87/number10/15242-3787/ },
doi = { 10.5120/15242-3787 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T22:05:32.678679+05:30
%A Shiva Prakash T
%A Raja K B
%A Venugopal K R
%T Real-Time Traffic-Differentiated QoS Routing for Wireless Sensor Networks
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 87
%N 10
%P 6-13
%D 2014
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) emerge as underlying infrastructures for new classes of large scale networked embedded systems. However, WSNs system designers must fulfill the Qualityof- Service (QoS) requirements imposed by the applications (and users). Very harsh and dynamic physical environments and extremely limited resources are major obstacles for satisfying QoS metrics such as reliability, timeliness, and system lifetime. The limited communication range of WSN nodes, link asymmetry, and the characteristics of the physical environment lead to a major source of QoS degradation in WSNs. This paper proposes a Real-Time Traffic-Differentiated Routing protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs). It targets WSN applications having different types of data traffic with several priorities. The protocol achieves to increase packet reception ratio and reduce end-to-end delay while considering multi-queue priority policy, two-hop neighborhood information, link reliability and power efficiency. The protocol is modular and utilizes memory and computational effective methods for estimating the link metrics. Numerical results show that the proposed protocol is a feasible solution to addresses QoS service differentiation for traffic with different priorities.

References
  1. NS-2, [Online]. Available: http://www. isi. edu/nsnam/ ns/.
  2. Crossbow Motes, [Online]. Available: http://www. xbow. com.
  3. A. Mahapatra, K. Anand, and D. P. Agrawal. QoS and Energy Aware Routing for Real-Time Traffic in Wireless Sensor Networks. in Computer Communications, 29(4):437–445, 2008.
  4. A. Sharif, V. Potdar and A. J. D Rathnayaka. Prioritizing Information for Achieving QoS Control in WSN. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications, pages 835–842, 2010.
  5. A. Woo and Culler. Evaluation of Efficient Link Reliability Estimators for Low-Power Wireless Networks. Technical report, University of California, 2003.
  6. B. Karp and Kung. H. T. GPSR: Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing for Wireless Networks. In Proc. 6th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom), pages 243–254, 2000.
  7. C. Lu, B. M. Blum, T. F. Abdelzaher, J. A. Stankovic, and T. He. RAP: A Real-Time Communication Architecture for Large-Scale Wireless Sensor Networks. In Proc. IEEE RTAS, Sep. 2002.
  8. C. -p. Li, W. -j. Hsu, B. Krishnamachari, and A. Helmy. A Local Metric for Geographic Routing with Power Control in Wireless Networks. Proc. Second Ann. IEEE Conf. Sensor and Ad Hoc Comm and Networks (SECON), pages 229–239, Sept. 2005.
  9. C. S. Chen, Y. Li, and Y. -Q. Song. An Exploration of Geographic Routing with K-hop Based Searching in Wireless Sensor Networks. In Proc. CHINACOM, pages 376–381, 2008.
  10. D. Tran and H. Raghavendra. Routing with Congestion Awareness and Adaptivity in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks. In Proc. of IEEE WCNC, Mar. 2005.
  11. Djamel Djenouri and Ilangko Balasingham. Traffic- Differentiation-Based Modular QoS Localized Routing for Wireless Sensor Networks. in IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 6(10):797–809, 2011.
  12. E. Felemban, C. G. Lee, and E. Ekici. MMSPEED: Multipath Multi-Speed Protocol for QoS Quarantee of Reliability and Timeliness inWireless Sensor Network. in IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 5(6):738–754, 2006.
  13. F. L. Lewis, D. J. Cook, S. K. Dasm and JohnWiley. Wireless Sensor Networks. In Proc. Smart Environment Technologies, Protocols and Applications, New York, pages 1–18, 2004.
  14. G. Calinescu. Computing 2-hop Neighborhoods in Ad hoc Wireless Networks. In Proc. AdHocNow, pages 175–186, 2003.
  15. K. Seada, M. Zuniga, A. Helmy, and B. Krishnamachari. Energy Efficient Forwarding Strategies for Geographic Routing in Lossy Wireless Sensor Networks. In Proc. ACM SenSys, pages 108–121, 2004.
  16. K. Sohrabi, J. Pottie. Protocols for Self-organization of A Wireless Sensor Network. in IEEE Personal Communications, 7(5):16–27, 2000.
  17. K. Zeng, K. Ren, W. Lou, and P. J. Moran. Energy Aware Efficient Geographic Routing in Lossy Wireless Sensor Networks with Environmental Energy Supply. in Wireless Networks, 15(1):39–51, 2009.
  18. K. Zeng, K. Ren, W. Lou, and P. J. Moran. Energy Aware Efficient Geographic Routing in Lossy Wireless Sensor Networks with Environmental Energy Supply. in Wireless Networks, 15(1):39–51, 2009.
  19. M. A. Spohn and J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves. Enhancing Broadcast Operations in Ad Hoc Networks with Two-Hop Connected Dominating Sets. Proc. IEEE MASS, pages 543– 545, 2004.
  20. M. Chen, V. Leung, S. Mao, Y. Xiao, and I. Chlamtac. Hybrid Geographical Routing for Flexible Energy-Delay Trade-Offs. in IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 58(9):4976– 4988, 2009.
  21. M. Koulali, A. Kobbane, M. El Koutbi and M. Azizi. QDGRP : A hybrid QoS Distributed Genetic routing protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks. In Proc. International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems, pages 47–52, 2012.
  22. M. M. Or-Rashid, Md. Abdur Razzaque, M. M. Alam and C. S. Hong. Multi-Constrained QoS Geographic Routing for Heterogeneous Traffic in Sensor Networks. in IEICE Transactions on Communications, 91B(8):2589–2601, 2008.
  23. M. E Rusli, R. Harris and A. Punchihewa. Markov Chainbased analytical model of Opportunistic Routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. In Proc. TENCON IEEE Region 10 Conference, pages 257–262, 2010.
  24. O. Chipara, Z. He, G. Xing, Q. Chen, X. Wang, C. Lu, J. Stankovic, and T. Abdelzaher. Real-Time Power-Aware Routing in Sensor Network. In Proc. IWQoS, pages 83–92, Jun. 2006.
  25. Prosenjit Bose, Pat Morin, Ivan Stojmenovi, and Jorge Urrutia. Routing with Guaranteed Delivery in Ad hoc Wireless Networks. In Proc. of 3rd ACM Int. Workshop on Discrete Algorithms and Methods for Mobile Computing and Communications DIALM'99, pages 48–55, Aug. 1999.
  26. S. Ehsan, B. Hamdaoui and M. Guizani. Radio and Medium Access Contention Aware Routing for Lifetime Maximization in Multichannel Sensor Networks. in IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communication, 11(9):3058–3067, 2012.
  27. S. Wu and K. S. Candan. Power Aware Single and Multipath Geographic Routing in Sensor Networks. Proc. IEEE Intl Conf. Broadband Networks (BROADNETS 05), 5(7):974– 997, 2007.
  28. T. He, C. Huang, B. M. Blum, J. A. Stankovic, and T. F. Abdelzaher. Range-Free Localization and Its Impact on Large Scale Sensor Networks. in ACM Trans. Embedded Computer Systems, 4(4):877–906, 2000.
  29. T. L. Lim and M. Gurusamy. Energy Aware Geographical Routing and Topology Control to Improve Network Lifetime in Wireless Sensor Networks. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Broadband Networks (BROADNETS05), pages 829–831, 2005.
  30. T. Roosta, M. Menzo, and S. Sastry. Probabilistic Geographical Routing Protocol for Ad-Hoc and Sensor Networks. In Proc. Intl Workshop Wireless Ad-Hoc Networks (IWWAN), 2005.
  31. Tian He, John A. Stankovic, Chenyang Lu, and Tarek F. Abdelzaher. A Spatiotemporal Protocol forWireless Sensor Network. in IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 16(10):995–1006, 2005.
  32. T. L. Lim and M. Gurusamy. Energy Aware Geographical Routing and Topology Control to Improve Network Lifetime inWireless Sensor Networks. In Proc. IEEE Intl Conf. Broadband Networks (BROADNETS 05), pages 829–831, 2005.
  33. X. Wu, B. J. dAuriol, J. Cho, and S. Lee. Optimal Routing in Sensor Networks for In-Home Health Monitoring with Multi Factor Considerations. In Proc. Sixth Ann. IEEE Intl Conf. Pervasive Computing and Comm. (PERCOM 08), pages 720– 725, 2008.
  34. Y. Li, C. S. Chen and Y. -Q. Song. Enhancing Real-Time Delivery In Wireless Sensor Networks With Two-Hop Information. in IEEE Transactions On Industrial Informatics, 5(2):113–122, 2009.
  35. Y. Sankarasubramaniam, B. Akan, and I. F. Akyildiz. ESRT:Event-to-Sink Reliable Transport in Wireless Sensor Networks. In Proc. of ACM Mobihoc, pages 177–188, 2003.
  36. YunboWang, M. C Vuran and S. Goddard. Cross-Layer Analysis of the End-to-End Delay Distribution in Wireless Sensor Networks. in IEEE Transactions on Networking, 20(1):305– 318, 2012.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Wireless Sensor Networks(WSNs) quality-of-service(QoS) twohop neighbors traffic-differentiation Packet Reception Ratio( PRR) end-to-end delay.

Powered by PhDFocusTM