CFP last date
20 January 2025
Call for Paper
February Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming February edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 January 2025

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
SFLA-Based Line Balancing and Task Optimization in Master-Slave Controlled Hanger Transportation Systems for Garment Production

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

An Efficient Objective Quality Model for Agile Application Development

by M. Usman Malik, Haseeb Nasir, Ali Javed
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 85 - Number 8
Year of Publication: 2014
Authors: M. Usman Malik, Haseeb Nasir, Ali Javed
10.5120/14861-3234

M. Usman Malik, Haseeb Nasir, Ali Javed . An Efficient Objective Quality Model for Agile Application Development. International Journal of Computer Applications. 85, 8 ( January 2014), 19-24. DOI=10.5120/14861-3234

@article{ 10.5120/14861-3234,
author = { M. Usman Malik, Haseeb Nasir, Ali Javed },
title = { An Efficient Objective Quality Model for Agile Application Development },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { January 2014 },
volume = { 85 },
number = { 8 },
month = { January },
year = { 2014 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 19-24 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume85/number8/14861-3234/ },
doi = { 10.5120/14861-3234 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T22:01:56.321138+05:30
%A M. Usman Malik
%A Haseeb Nasir
%A Ali Javed
%T An Efficient Objective Quality Model for Agile Application Development
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 85
%N 8
%P 19-24
%D 2014
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

In the recent past, software industry has seen a paradigm shift in the software development methodologies. Several software development models have been proposed from time to time keeping in view the changing patterns and requirements of customers. Advancements in technology and change in standard operating procedures of corporate sector organizations has led to the development and evolution of several software development models. Currently, agile application development methodology is the most widely use software development model owing to its flexibility. Quality models have also evolved with corresponding to the software development models. Previously several quality metrics models have been developed for waterfall, spiral and incremental development. Work is also being done to propose a quality model which could ensure the quality of agile product being developed. However a robust and standard quality metrics model is lacking for the agile methodologies which can ensure that agile product being developed will fulfill implicit as well as explicit quality characteristics as agreed by the stakeholders. In this paper a quality metrics model for agile application development methodologies has been proposed which ascertains that the quality of the product being developed in agile requirement meet the standard and desired criteria of quality.

References
  1. C. Larman, Agile and Iterative Development: A Manager's Guide. Boston: Addison Wesley, 2004.
  2. C. Larman and V. Basili, "A History of Iterative and Incremental Development," IEEE Computer, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 47-56, June 2003.
  3. V. R. Basili and A. J. Turner, "Iterative Enhancement: A Practical Technique for Software Development," IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 266 - 270,1975.
  4. B. Curtis, "Three Problems Overcome with BehavioralModels of the Software Development Process (Panel)," International Conference on Software Engineering, Pittsburgh, PA, 1989, pp. 398-399.
  5. Murauskaite A. , Adomauskas V. , "Bottlenecks in Agile Software Development using Theory of Constraints(TOC) Principles", Master's Thesis, Gothenburg, Sweden 2008.
  6. Pekka Abrahamsson, Outi Salo, Jussi Rankainen & Juhani Warsta : Agile software development methods
  7. Peter Coad, Eric Lefebvre, Jeff De Luca : Java Modeling in Color with UML, Prentice Hall PTR, 1999, Chapter 6.
  8. Kent BeckExtreme Programming explained, Addison-Wesley, 1999. Review and analysis, VTT Electronics, 2002.
  9. Ken Schwaber, Mike Beedle: Agile Software Development with Scrum, Prentice Hall, 2001.
  10. Kumar, A. , Kumar, R. and Grover, P. S. 2006. A changeImpact Assessment in Aspect-Oriented Software Systems, In the proceedings of International Software Engineering Conference Russia, (SECR-2006), Dec, pp. 83-87.
  11. Ghezzi, Jazaveri, C. M and Mandrioli. D. 1991. Fundamentals of Software Engineering. Prentice-Hall, NJ, USA.
  12. Boehm, B. W. et al. 1978. Characteristics of software Quality, TRW Series of software Technology, Amsterdam, North Holland.
  13. Hyatt, L. E. and Rosenberg, L. H. 1996. Product Assurance Symposium and Software Product Assurance Workshop, Proceedings of meetings, European Space Agency, pp. 209
  14. IEEE 1993. Standard for Software Maintenance, Software Engineering Standards Subcommittee of the IEEE Computer Society.
  16. Dromey, G. R. 1995. A model for software product quality, IEEE Trans. on software Eng. , vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 146-162
  17. Fusani, M. 1995. Quality Models for Software Evolution Instruments International Seminar on Software Measuring & Testing, IEI -CNR /Qualital /SSSUP S. ANNA Pisa, Italia.
  18. IEEE 1993. Standard for Software Maintenance, Software Engineering Standards Subcommittee of the IEEE Computer Society.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Software Engineering Software Quality Assurance Quality Metrics Model Agile Engineering

Powered by PhDFocusTM