We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

Dynamics of User Experience (UX)

by Zahid Hasan, Rathindra Chandra Gope
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 81 - Number 16
Year of Publication: 2013
Authors: Zahid Hasan, Rathindra Chandra Gope
10.5120/14207-2443

Zahid Hasan, Rathindra Chandra Gope . Dynamics of User Experience (UX). International Journal of Computer Applications. 81, 16 ( November 2013), 18-24. DOI=10.5120/14207-2443

@article{ 10.5120/14207-2443,
author = { Zahid Hasan, Rathindra Chandra Gope },
title = { Dynamics of User Experience (UX) },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { November 2013 },
volume = { 81 },
number = { 16 },
month = { November },
year = { 2013 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 18-24 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume81/number16/14207-2443/ },
doi = { 10.5120/14207-2443 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T21:56:13.401413+05:30
%A Zahid Hasan
%A Rathindra Chandra Gope
%T Dynamics of User Experience (UX)
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 81
%N 16
%P 18-24
%D 2013
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

User experience (UX) is not a static phenomenon; the way we interact with the technologies is dynamic which evolves over time. Ignoring this temporal nature of UX we cannot fully understand user experience. A longitudinal experiment was conducted over four weeks following 15 individuals using one of four medial players in their daily lives to examine users' behavior in prolonged use case and to investigate which factors have what type of impact on users' overall judgments at different point of time. Our analysis suggests that even if non-instrumental (e. g. Aesthetics of interface) quality plays an important role to form users overall judgments during the initial interaction, in prolonged use cage instrumental qualities (i. e. usability, functionality) become more influential.

References
  1. Bevan, N. What is the difference between the purpose of usability and user experience evaluation methods. In Proc. of the UXEM Workshop at INTERACT (2009).
  2. De Angeli, A. , Sutcliffe, A. , and Hartmann, J. Interaction, usability and aesthetics: what influences users' preferences? In Proceedings of the 6th conference on Designing Interactive systems, ACM (2006), 271–280.
  3. Hassenzahl, M. The interplay of beauty, goodness, and usability in interactive products. Human-Computer Interaction 19, 4 (2004), 319–349.
  4. Karapanos, E. , Hassenzahl, M. , and Martens, J. User experience over time. In CHI'08 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (2008), 3561–3566.
  5. Karapanos, E. , Zimmerman, J. , Forlizzi, J. , and Martens, J. User experience over time: an initial framework. In Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (2009), 729–738.
  6. Lavie, T. , and Tractinsky, N. Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites* 1. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 60, 3 (2004), 269–298.
  7. Lewis, J. Ibm computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 7, 1 (1995), 57–78.
  8. Mendoza, V. , and Novick, D. Usability over time. Proceedings of the 23rd annual international conference on Design of communication for pervasive information (2005), 151--158.
  9. Tractinsky, N. , and Zmiri, D. Exploring attributes of skins as potential antecedents of emotion in hci. Aesthetic computing (2006), 405–422.
  10. Von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, M. , Hassenzahl, M. , and Platz, A. Dynamics of user experience: How the perceived quality of mobile phones changes over time.
  11. Tractinsky, N. , Katz, A. S. , Ikar, D. What is beautiful is usable. Interacting with Computers, (2000),13, pp. 127–145.
  12. Norman, D. A. Emotion and design: Attractive things work better. Interactions Magazine, (2002) 9 (4), 36-42.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

User Experience Usability User satisfaction User interface