We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 November 2024
Reseach Article

Article:The Role of Pattern Recognition in Computer-Aided Diagnosis and Computer-Aided Detection in Medical Imaging: A Clinical Validation

by Srinivasan Nagaraj, G Narasinga rao, K Koteswararao
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 8 - Number 5
Year of Publication: 2010
Authors: Srinivasan Nagaraj, G Narasinga rao, K Koteswararao
10.5120/1207-1729

Srinivasan Nagaraj, G Narasinga rao, K Koteswararao . Article:The Role of Pattern Recognition in Computer-Aided Diagnosis and Computer-Aided Detection in Medical Imaging: A Clinical Validation. International Journal of Computer Applications. 8, 5 ( October 2010), 18-22. DOI=10.5120/1207-1729

@article{ 10.5120/1207-1729,
author = { Srinivasan Nagaraj, G Narasinga rao, K Koteswararao },
title = { Article:The Role of Pattern Recognition in Computer-Aided Diagnosis and Computer-Aided Detection in Medical Imaging: A Clinical Validation },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { October 2010 },
volume = { 8 },
number = { 5 },
month = { October },
year = { 2010 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 18-22 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume8/number5/1207-1729/ },
doi = { 10.5120/1207-1729 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T19:56:41.643023+05:30
%A Srinivasan Nagaraj
%A G Narasinga rao
%A K Koteswararao
%T Article:The Role of Pattern Recognition in Computer-Aided Diagnosis and Computer-Aided Detection in Medical Imaging: A Clinical Validation
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 8
%N 5
%P 18-22
%D 2010
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

The idea to use texture analysis in medical imaging has been considered since the early 1970s. However, the exciting evolution of both texture analysis algorithms and computer technology revived researchers' interest in applications for medical imaging in recent years. Technical innovations in medical cross-sectional imaging have opened up new vistas for the exploration of the human body, enabling both high spatial and temporal resolution. On Difficulties Caused by Missing Reference Image Datasets One of the main problems in the development of systems for the analysis of medical images or segmentation algorithms is the set of images that is used for both the development and the testing of the system. This paper proposes a diagnostic scheme follows a familiar two-step approach. Initially, textural information is extracted from the image. Subsequently, the extracted information is fed into a decisional algorithm that is designed to perform the diagnostic task.The talk covers new methods for pattern recognition and computer-aided diagnosis in the field of MRI, such as functional MRI for human brain mapping, therapy control by automatic lesion detection in multiple sclerosis, and new approaches to breast cancer diagnosis in MRI mammography. In the light of such innovative techniques for pattern recognition in biomedicine, the increasing demand for publicly accessible validation platforms is emphasized. With image texture analysis in the role of the visual perceptional function, the process of feature extraction and image coding is achieved. The extracted features can now be merged into a diagnosis by using a decision-making algorithm, with choices that range from the rule-based models to the traditional statistical analysis to the more popular (and often more successful) artificial intelligence techniques, such as neural networks and genetic algorithms. By using image texture analysis as the preprocessing step in CAD schemes, the input generation process is automated and, therefore, is reproducible and robust. Some techniques represent texture on the basis of the spectral properties of an image. Others are model-based techniques that analyze texture by identifying an appropriate model that reflects the prior beliefs and knowledge about the type of images to be analyzed. There are textural features that describe local image statistics and others that describe global statistics.

References
  1. Chen DR, Chang RF, Huang YL. Computer-aided diagnosis applied to US of solid breast nodules by using neural networks. Radiology 1999; 213:407-412.
  2. D R. Brunelli, Template Matching Techniques in Computer Vision: Theory and Practice, Wiley, ISBN 978-0-470-51706-2, 2009 (TM book).
  3. Fukunaga, Keinosuke (1990). Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition (2nd ed.). Boston: Academic Press. ISBN 0-12-269851-
  4. Bishop, Christopher (2006). Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Berlin: Springer. ISBN 0-387-31073-8.
  5. Godfried T. Toussaint, ed (1988). Computational Morphology. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
  6. Kulikowski, Casimir A.; Weiss, Sholom M. (1991). Computer Systems That Learn: Classification and Prediction Methods from Statistics, Neural Nets, Machine Learning, and Expert Systems. Machine Learning. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. ISBN 1-55860-065-5.
  7. Krupinski EA. The future of image perception in radiology. Acad Radiol. 2003;10:1–3. [PubMed].
  8. Vittitoe NF, Baker JA, Floyd CE, Jr. Fractal texture analysis in computer-aided diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodules. Acad Radiol 1997; 4:96-101.
  9. S Wei D, Chan HP, Helvie MA, et al. Classification of mass and normal breast tissue on digital mammograms: multiresolution texture analysis. Med Phys 1995; 22:1501-1513.
  10. Chan HP, Sahiner B, Petrick N, et al. Computerized classification of malignant and benign microcalcifications on mammograms: texture analysis using an artificial neural network. Phys Med Biol 1997; 42:549-567.
  11. Petrick N, Chan HP, Wei D, Sahiner B, Helvie MA, Adler DD. Automated detection of breast masses on mammograms using adaptive contrast enhancement and texture classification. Med Phys 1996; 23:1685-1696.
  12. McPherson DD, Aylward PE, Knosp BM, et al. Ultrasound characterization of acute myocardial ischemia by quantitative texture analysis. Ultrason Imaging 1986; 8:227-240.
  13. Ito M, Ohki M, Hayashi K, Yamada M, Uetani M, Nakamura T. Trabecular texture analysis of CT images in the relationship with spinal fracture. Radiology 1995; 194:55-59.
  14. Staff RT, Gemmell HG, Duff PM, et al. Decompression illness in sports divers detected with technetium-99m-HMPAO SPECT and texture analysis. J Nucl Med 1996; 37:1154-1158.
  15. Lucht R, Brix G, Lorenz WJ. Texture analysis of differently reconstructed PET images. Phys Med Biol 1996; 41:2207-2219.
  16. Robinson PJ. Radiology's Achilles' heel: error and variation in the interpretation of the Roentgen image. Br J Radiol 1997; 70:1085-1098.
  17. Anderson RE, Hill RB, Key CR. The sensitivity and specificity of clinical diagnostics during five decades: toward an understanding of necessary fallibility. JAMA 1989; 261:1610-1617.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Textual image CAD Pattern recognition Pattern matching