We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 December 2024
Call for Paper
January Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming January edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 December 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Improved Shuffled Frog Leaping Algorithm with Self-Adaptive Shuffling for Fuzzy Logic PD+G Controller Optimization in Robotic Manipulators

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Performance Observation of Distinct Routing Protocols under IPV6 Environment

by Shival Chadda
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 78 - Number 9
Year of Publication: 2013
Authors: Shival Chadda
10.5120/13515-1292

Shival Chadda . Performance Observation of Distinct Routing Protocols under IPV6 Environment. International Journal of Computer Applications. 78, 9 ( September 2013), 6-12. DOI=10.5120/13515-1292

@article{ 10.5120/13515-1292,
author = { Shival Chadda },
title = { Performance Observation of Distinct Routing Protocols under IPV6 Environment },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { September 2013 },
volume = { 78 },
number = { 9 },
month = { September },
year = { 2013 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 6-12 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume78/number9/13515-1292/ },
doi = { 10.5120/13515-1292 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T21:51:07.925752+05:30
%A Shival Chadda
%T Performance Observation of Distinct Routing Protocols under IPV6 Environment
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 78
%N 9
%P 6-12
%D 2013
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

In a mobile ad hoc network (MANET), the topology of the network may change rapidly and unexpectedly due to mobility of nodes. Routing protocols operate differently under distinct environments. Thus, it is necessary to analyze the behavior of different routing protocols under distinct environments. Thus, setting up routes that meet high reliability is a very challenging issue. Another important problem in the MANETs is the energy consumption of nodes. Our study is more concentrated on IPv6 than IPv4. The IPv6-enabled network architecture will become the future standard. IPv6 based network is more protected than IPv4 network and also IPv6 has huge address space support. In this Paper study has been done on the performance observation of various routing protocols of MANET under IPv6 Environment . OPNET Modeler 14. 5 is used as simulation tool. We have analyzed the behavior of three routing protocols in the network protocol IPV4 & IPV6 and compared the performance of these protocols using OPNET Modeler 14. 5. IPv6 Migration planner helps in migrating the nodes to IPv6 Environment. Routing protocols are estimated under IPv6 environment on the basis of Wireless LAN Load, wireless LAN Data dropped, Throughput, and Network load. The objective of this research is to examine how these routing protocols act under IPv6 environment and identify which routing protocol performs better.

References
  1. S. Deering and R. Hinden, "Internet protocol, version 6 (IPv6) specification," IETF, RFC 2460, 1998.
  2. Hinden, R. Hindon, and S. Deering, "Internet protocol version 6 addressing architecture," IETF, RFC 3513, 2003.
  3. T. Narten, E. Nordmark, and W. Simpson, "Neighbor discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6)," IETF, RFC2461, 1998.
  4. S. Thomson and T. Narten, "IPv6 stateless address autoconfiguration," IETF, RFC 2462, 1998.
  5. C. Perkins, J. Malinen, R. Wakikawa, E. Belding-Royer, and Y. Sun, "IP address autoconfiguration for ad hoc networks," IETF Internet Draft, draft-ietf-manet-autoconf-01. txt, 2001.
  6. R. Wakikawa, J. Malinen, C. Perkins, A. Nilsson, and A. Tuominen, "Global connectivity for IPv6 mobile ad hoc networks," IETF Internet Draft, draft-wakikawa-manet-globalv6-03. txt, 2003.
  7. I. K. Park, Y. H. Kim, and S. S. Lee, "IPv6 address allocation in hybrid mobile ad hoc networks," in Proc. 2nd IEEE Workshop Softw. Technol. Embedded Ubiquitous Comput. Syst. , May 2004, pp. 58–62.
  8. A. B. Malany , V. R. S. Dhulipala, R. M. Chandrasekaran , "Throughput and Delay Comparison of MANET Routing Protocols", Int. J. Open Problems Compt. Math. , ICSRS Publications , ISSN 1998-6262,Vol. 2, No. 3, September 2009, pp. 461-468.
  9. M. Ramakrishnan, M. A. Baghyavenil, S. Shanmugavell, "Dynamic Reconfigurable Routing for High throughput in MANET", IEEE - ICSCN 2007, 22-24 February 2007, MIT Campus, Anna University, Chennai, India, pp. 541-544.
  10. Josh Broach, David A. Maltz, David B. Johson, Yih-Chun Hu and Jorjeta Jetcheva (1998). A Performance Comparison of Multi-hop Wireless Ad Hoc Network Routing Protocols. Proc. of MobiCom. Texas. USA,1998.
  11. Sampo Naski" Performance of Ad Hoc Routing Protocols: Characteristics and Comparison", Seminar on Internetworking. Helsinki University of Technology,2004.
  12. Mamoun Hussein Mamon (2007). "Important Characteristic of Differences between DSR and AODV Routing Protocol". MCN Conference,2007.
  13. Bu Sung Lee, Mai Ngoc San, Teck Meng Lim, Chai Kiat Yeo & Boon Chong Seet (2006). "Processing Delay as a New Metric for On-Demand Mobile Ad Hoc",2006.
  14. S. Deering ,R. Hinden, "Internet protocol, version 6 (IPv6) specification," IETF, RFC 2460, 1998.
  15. Hinden, R. Hindon, , S. Deering, "Internet protocol version 6 addressing architecture," IETF, RFC 3513, 2003.
  16. Wells Paris, "Ad Hoc Wireless Network Comparision – A Comparision between DSR and AODV Routing Protocols" – Wireless Data Communications System, School of Engineering and Design, Brunel University.
  17. Qasim Nadia, Said Fatin & Aghvami Hamid – "Mobile Ad Hoc Networking Protocol's Evaluation through Simulation for Quality of Service. " - IAENG International Journal of Computer Science, 36:1, IJCS_36_1_10, 17 February, 2009.
  18. T. H. Clausen et al, ?The optimized link state routing protocol evaluating through experiments and simulation?,mindpass center for distributed system,Aalborg university ,Denmark.
  19. C. Ahn, et. al , ?Gathering-based routing protocol in mobile ad hoc networks, Computer Communications? 30 (1) (2006) 202–206 .
  20. Huhtonen A,"Comparing AODV And OLSR Routing Protocols" Helsinki University of Technology Sjökulla, 2004-04-26.
  21. Razan Al-Ani ?Simulation and performance analysis evaluation variant MANET routing protocol? International Journal of Advancements in Computing Technology, Volume 3, Number 1, February 2011.
  22. Kumar Tanuja," Performance Evaluation Of AODV And OLSR Under Mobility" Rutgers University, 2009.
  23. Amritbir Singh "Comparative Analysis of OLSR and AODV under IPv6 Environment" International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 – 8887) Volume 61– No. 4, January 2013.
  24. S. R. Das, R. Castaeda, J. Yan, "Simulation-based performance evaluation of routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks", Mobile Networks and Applications, Vol. 5, pp. 179–189, 2000.
  25. Aboelela Emad, Ph. D. "Chapter 15 – Mobile Wireless Networks:Network Simulation Experiments Manual" – 2nd Edition, Morgan Kufman Publishers, 30 Corporate Drive, Suite 400, Burlington, MA 01803, USA. 2008 Elsevier Inc. , ISBN: 978-0-12-373974-2
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Mobile Adhoc Networks Routing Protocols AODV OLSR GRP Internet Protocol version 6

Powered by PhDFocusTM