CFP last date
20 January 2025
Reseach Article

Automatic Activity Recognition for Video Surveillance

by J. Arunnehru, M. Kalaiselvi Geetha
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 75 - Number 9
Year of Publication: 2013
Authors: J. Arunnehru, M. Kalaiselvi Geetha
10.5120/13136-0537

J. Arunnehru, M. Kalaiselvi Geetha . Automatic Activity Recognition for Video Surveillance. International Journal of Computer Applications. 75, 9 ( August 2013), 1-6. DOI=10.5120/13136-0537

@article{ 10.5120/13136-0537,
author = { J. Arunnehru, M. Kalaiselvi Geetha },
title = { Automatic Activity Recognition for Video Surveillance },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { August 2013 },
volume = { 75 },
number = { 9 },
month = { August },
year = { 2013 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 1-6 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume75/number9/13136-0537/ },
doi = { 10.5120/13136-0537 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T21:43:47.839130+05:30
%A J. Arunnehru
%A M. Kalaiselvi Geetha
%T Automatic Activity Recognition for Video Surveillance
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 75
%N 9
%P 1-6
%D 2013
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Activity recognition is having a wide range of applications in automated surveillance and is an active research topic among computer vision community. In this paper, an activity recognition approach is proposed. Motion information is extracted from the difference image based on Region of Interest (ROI) using 18-Dimensional features called Block Intensity Vector (BIV). The experiments are carried out on the KTH dataset considering four activities viz. , (walking, running, waving and boxing) with SVM. The approach shows an overall performance of 94. 58% in recognizing the actions performed. Experimental results show that the proposed approach is comparable with the existing methods.

References
  1. Sadek, S. , Al-Hamadi, A. , Michaelis, B. and Sayed, U. 2011. Human action Recognition: A novel scheme using fuzzy log-polar histogram and temporal self-similarity, EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing.
  2. Poppe, R. June, 2010. A survey on vision-based human action recognition, In Proceedings of Image and Vision Computing, Vol. 28, pp. 976–990.
  3. Weinland, D. , Ronfard, R. and Boyer, E. 2011. A survey of vision-based methods for action representation, segmentation and recognition, In Proceedings of Computer Vision and Image Understanding , Vol. 115, pp. 224–241.
  4. Rautaray, S. and Agrawal, A. 2012. Vision based hand gesture recognition for human computer interaction: A survey, Artificial Intelligence Review.
  5. Cohen, I. and Li, H. 2003. Inference of Human Postures by Classfication of 3D Human Body Shapes, IEEE international Workshop on Analysis and Modeling of Faces and Gestures, pp. 74–81.
  6. Ivan Laptev, Marcin Marszalek, Cordelia Schmid and Benjamin Rozenfeld. June, 2008. Learning realistic human actions from movies, In Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
  7. Juan Carlos Niebles, Chih-Wei Chen and Fei-Fei, L. 2010. Modeling temporal structure of decomposable motion segments for activity classification, In Proceedings of the 11th European Conference of Computer Vision (ECCV), Greece.
  8. Chandra mani Sharma, Alok Kr, Singh Kushwaha, Swati Nigam and Ashish Khare. 2011. Automatic human activity recognition in video using background modeling and spatio-temporal template matching based technique, Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Computing and Artificial Intelligence, pp. 99–101.
  9. Yao, A. , Gall, J. , Fanelli, G. and Van Gool, L. 2011. Does Human Action Recognition Benefit from Pose Estimation?, In Proceedings of BMVC, pp. 1–67.
  10. Xia, L. , Chen, C. C. and Aggarwal, J. K. June, 2012. View invariant human action recognition using histograms of 3D joints, In Proceedings of CVPR workshop on Human Activity Understanding from 3D Data (HAU3D).
  11. Jordi Sanchez-Riera, Jan Cech and Radu Horaud. October, 2012. Action Recognition Robust to Background Clutter by Using Stereo Vision, 4th International Workshop on Video Event Categorization, Tagging and Retrieval.
  12. Wallraven, C. , Caputo, B. and Graf, A. 2003. Recognition with local features: Kernel receipe, In Proceedings of ICCV, pp. 257–246.
  13. Wolf, L. and Shashua, A. 2003. Kernel Principal angles for classification machines with applications to image sequences interpretation, In Proceedings of CVPR, pp. 635–640.
  14. Nello Cristianini and John Shawe-Taylor. 2000. An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods, Cambridge University Press.
  15. Tom Mitchell. 1997. Machine Learning, McGraw-Hill Computer science series.
  16. Vapnik, V. 1998. Statistical Learning Theory, Wiley, NY.
  17. Lewis, J. P. 2004. Tutorial on SVM, CGIT Lab, USC.
  18. Chih-Chung Chang and Chih-Jen Lin. 2011. LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines, ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, Vol. 2, pp. 1–27.
  19. Jhuang, H. , Serre, T. , Wolf, L. and Poggio, T. 2007. A biologically inspired system for action recognition, In Proceedings of ICCV.
  20. Nowozin, S. , Bakir, G. and Tsuda, K. 2007. Discriminative subsequence mining for action classification, In Proceedings of ICCV.
  21. Dollar, P. , Rabaud, V. , Cottrell, G. and Belongie, S. 2005. Behavior recognition via sparse spatio-temporal features, Proceedings of the 14thInternational Conference on Computer Communications and Networks, pp. 65–72.
  22. Schuldt, C. , Laptev, I. and Caputo, B. June, 2004. Recognizing human actions: A local SVM approach, Pattern Recognition, Proceedings of the 17th International Conference, ICPR 04, Vol. 3, pp. 32–36.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Video Surveillance Activity Recognition Gesture Recognition Support Vector Machines Difference Image