We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 November 2024
Reseach Article

Web Mashup Integration to End-Users using QoS and Proficient Assessments

by Subbulakshmi.s, Praveen Kumar.b
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 75 - Number 5
Year of Publication: 2013
Authors: Subbulakshmi.s, Praveen Kumar.b
10.5120/13104-0407

Subbulakshmi.s, Praveen Kumar.b . Web Mashup Integration to End-Users using QoS and Proficient Assessments. International Journal of Computer Applications. 75, 5 ( August 2013), 1-5. DOI=10.5120/13104-0407

@article{ 10.5120/13104-0407,
author = { Subbulakshmi.s, Praveen Kumar.b },
title = { Web Mashup Integration to End-Users using QoS and Proficient Assessments },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { August 2013 },
volume = { 75 },
number = { 5 },
month = { August },
year = { 2013 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 1-5 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume75/number5/13104-0407/ },
doi = { 10.5120/13104-0407 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T21:43:26.700323+05:30
%A Subbulakshmi.s
%A Praveen Kumar.b
%T Web Mashup Integration to End-Users using QoS and Proficient Assessments
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 75
%N 5
%P 1-5
%D 2013
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

"Needs have become more and the search for those needs have become rapid. " Everything relies online. Web services are one of the emerging drifts that visualises fundamental to super-rational requests and providing a high fidelity outcome via QoS analysis. Extensive sharing of resources is the vital logic of such web services which enables the users & programmers to exploit data sources available at varied geographical distinctions. For instance, Google Drive is one such web service that offers data portability. The elimination of time old, one to one communication and enhanced many-to-many interactions is accomplished through Web Services, thereby improvising the intellectual standards of common users. Implemented on a Wide area of network applications, web services offer high accuracy, enriched results from existing data.

References
  1. Yahoo Pipes, http://pipes. yahoo. com/pipes, 2010. IBM Mash up Center, http://www-01. ibm. com/software/info/mashup-center, 2010.
  2. Intel Mashmaker, http://mashmaker. intel. com/web, 2010.
  3. B. Medjahed, A. Bouguettaya, and A. K. Elmagarmid, "Composing Web Services on the Semantic Web," VLDBJ. , vol. 12, no. 4,pp. 333-351, 2003.
  4. R. Fikes and N. J. Nilsson, "STRIPS: A New Approach to the Application of Theorem Proving to Problem Solving," Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2, pp. 189-208, 1971.
  5. A. L. Blum and M. L. Furst, "Fast Planning through Planning Graph Analysis," Artificial Intelligence, vol. 90, nos. 1/2, pp. 281-300, 1997.
  6. J. Rao, P. Ku¨ ngas, and M. Matskin, "Composition of Semantic WebServices Using Linear Logic Theorem Proving," Information Systems, vol. 31, nos. 4/5, pp. 340-360, 2006.
  7. H. Salkin and K. Mathur, Foundations of Integer Programming. NorthHollard, 1989.
  8. B. Medjahed and A. Bouguettaya, "A Multilevel ComposabilityModel for Semantic Web Services," IEEE Trans. Knowledge and Data Eng. , vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 954-968, July 2005.
  9. Q. Yu and A. Bouguettaya, "Framework for Web Service QueryAlgebra and Optimization," ACM Trans. Web, vol. 2, no. 1,pp. 1-35, 2008. I. F. Ilyas, W. G. Aref, and A. K. Elmagarmid, "Supporting Top-kJoin Queries in Relational Databases," Proc. 29th Int'l Conf. VeryLarge Data Bases, pp. 754-765, 2003.
  10. C. Boutilier, R. I. Brafman, C. Domshlak, H. H. Hoos, and D. Poole,"CP-Nets: A Tool for Representing and Reasoning with Conditional Ceteris Paribus Preference Statements," J. Artificial IntelligenceResearch, vol. 21, pp. 135-191, 2004.
  11. A. Tversky, "Contrasting Rational and Psychological Principlesof Choice," Wise Choices: Decisions, Games, and Negotiations, R. J. Zeckhauser, R. L. Keeney, and J. K. Sebenius, eds. , pp. 5-21,Harvard Business School Press, 1996.
  12. B. A. Mellers, A. Schwartz, and A. D. J. Cooke, "Judgment andDecision Making," Ann. Rev. Psychology, vol. 49, pp. 447-477, 1998.
  13. H. Wang, S. Shao, X. Zhou, C. Wan, and A. Bouguettaya, "WebService Selection with Incomplete or Inconsistent User Preferences," Proc. Int'l Joint Conf. Service-Oriented Computing (ICSOC)/ServiceWave, pp. 83-98, 2009.
  14. P. Resnick, K. Kuwabara, R. Zeckhauser, and E. Friedman,"Reputation Systems," Comm. ACM, vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 45-48, 2000.
  15. E. Bertino, E. Ferrari, and A. C. Squicciarini, "Trust-X: A Peer-to-Peer Framework for Trust Establishment," IEEE Trans. Knowledge and Data Eng. , vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 827-842, July 2004.
  16. H. Skogsrud, B. Benatallah, F. Casati, and M. Q. Dinh, "Trust-Serv: A Lightweight Trust Negotiation Service," Proc. 30th Int'l Conf. Very Large Data Bases, pp. 1329-1332, 2004.
  17. Z. Malik and A. Bouguettaya, "Evaluating Rater Credibility for Reputation Assessment of Web Services," Proc. Eighth Int'l Conf. Web Information Systems Eng. , pp. 38-49, 2007.
  18. S. Park, L. Liu, C. Pu, M. Srivatsa, and J. Zhang, "Resilient TrustManagement for Web Service Integration," Proc. Third IEEE Int'l Conf. Web Services, pp. 499-506, 2005.
  19. L. Xiong and L. Liu, "Peertrust: Supporting Reputation-BasedTrust for Peer-to-Peer Electronic Communities," IEEE Trans. Knowledge and Data Eng. , vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 843-857, July 2004
  20. S. Nepal, Z. Malik, and A. Bouguettaya, "Reputation Propagation in Composite Services," Proc. Seventh IEEE Int'l Conf. Web Services, 2009.
  21. L. Zeng, B. Benatallah, A. H. H. Ngu, M. Dumas, J. Kalagnanam,and H. Chang, "QoS-Aware Middleware for Web ServicesComposition," IEEE Trans. Software Eng. , vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 311-327, May 2004.
  22. Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory ofbehavioral change. Psychol. Rev. 8(2):191–215, 1977.
  23. Beckwith, L. , Burnett, M. , Grigoreanu, V. , and Wiedenbeck,S. Gender HCI: What about the software? Computer39(11):83–87, 2006.
  24. Cao, J. , Riche, Y. , Wiedenbeck, S. , Burnett, M. andGrigoreanu, V. End-user mashup programming:Through the design lens, In Proc. CHI, 1009–1018,2010.
  25. Compeau, D. and Higgins, C. Computer self-efficacy:Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly19(2), 1995.
  26. Cross, N. Designerly Ways of Knowing, Springer, 2006.
  27. Grigoreanu, V. , Cao, J. , Kulesza, T. , Bogart, C. , Rector,K. , Burnett, M. , and Wiedenbeck, S. Can feature designreduce the gender gap in end-user software developmentenvironments? In Proc. VL/HCC, 149–156, 2008.
  28. Grigoreanu, V. , Brundage, J. , Bahna, E. , Burnett, M. ,ElRif, P. , and Snover, J. Males' and females' script debuggingstrategies. In Proc. EUD, 205–224, 2009.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Scrutiniser Concurrency Ontology Conceptualization