We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 November 2024
Call for Paper
December Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming December edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 November 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
Reseach Article

A Survey of SSR Mechanism and Application

by Muhammed Kurhad Ucar, Mehmet Recep Bozkurt, Ferda Bozkurt
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 73 - Number 6
Year of Publication: 2013
Authors: Muhammed Kurhad Ucar, Mehmet Recep Bozkurt, Ferda Bozkurt
10.5120/12743-9657

Muhammed Kurhad Ucar, Mehmet Recep Bozkurt, Ferda Bozkurt . A Survey of SSR Mechanism and Application. International Journal of Computer Applications. 73, 6 ( July 2013), 9-14. DOI=10.5120/12743-9657

@article{ 10.5120/12743-9657,
author = { Muhammed Kurhad Ucar, Mehmet Recep Bozkurt, Ferda Bozkurt },
title = { A Survey of SSR Mechanism and Application },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { July 2013 },
volume = { 73 },
number = { 6 },
month = { July },
year = { 2013 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 9-14 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume73/number6/12743-9657/ },
doi = { 10.5120/12743-9657 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T21:39:20.583006+05:30
%A Muhammed Kurhad Ucar
%A Mehmet Recep Bozkurt
%A Ferda Bozkurt
%T A Survey of SSR Mechanism and Application
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 73
%N 6
%P 9-14
%D 2013
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

This article aims to introduce readers to a recent research topic, sympathetic skin response (SSR). The article provides information on the historical development of sympathetic response since the late 19th century. The article also includes information on the identification of naturally existed amplitude and latency values and classification based on these values, international measurement techniques with the studies conducted within the last hundred years, the factors effecting these measurements according to the studies conducted, and criteria used in the evaluation of the data obtained. In addition, information is given about the studies that have been made.

References
  1. Gülhan H, deridirencide?erlerininHastal?klardaöntan?arac?olarakkullan?lmas?. YüksekLisansTezi – 2009. Turkish.
  2. Çetinyalçin I. CiltRezistansinaTesir Eden MuhtelifFaktörler, PeriferikSinirHastaliklarindaCiltRezistansiveEhemmiyeti, UzmanlikTezi, I. Ü. Cerrahpasa Tip FakültesiKütüphanesi, No: 538. Turkish.
  3. Kucera P, Goldenberg Z, Kurca E. Sympathetic skin response: review of the method and its clinical use. BratislLekListy 2004; 105
  4. : 108-116.
  5. Verghese A. Some observations on psychogalvanic reflex. Brij J Psychiat 1968; 114: 639-642.
  6. Christie MJ. Elekctrodermal activity in the 1980s: a review. J Roy Soc Med 1981; 74; 616-622.
  7. Guida A. A new method of simultaneous recording of two effects of the psychogalvanic reflex [Tarchanoff effect and Fere effect]RivPatolClin. 1957 Jun;12
  8. :303-1.
  9. Ertekin C. Santralveperiferik EMG Otonomsinirsistemi. 2006:884-909. Turkish.
  10. Knezevic W, Bajada S. Peripheral autonomic surface potential: a quantitative technique for recording sympathetic conduction in man. J NeurolSci 1985; 67: 239-251.
  11. Shahani BT, Halperin JJ, BouluPh, Cohen J. Sympathetic skin response – a method of assessing unmyelinated axon dysfunction in peripheral neuropaties. J NeurolNeurosurg Psychiatry 1984; 47: 536-542.
  12. Lader MH, Montagu JD. The psychogalvanic reflex: a pharmacologic study of peripheral machanism. J NeurolNeurosurg Psychiatry 1962; 25: 126-133.
  13. Arunodaya GR, Taly AB. Sympathetic Skin Response: A Decade Later, Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 129: 81-89, 1995.
  14. Cariga P, Catley M, Mathias CJ, Savic G Frankel HL, Ellaway PH. Organisation of the Sympathetic Skin Response in Spinal Cord Injury. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, 72:356-360, 2002.
  15. Selçuk B, Atl? D, Kurtaran A, ?nan?r M, Akyüz M. Serebrovasküler Olay Sonras?HemiplejiGeli?enHastalardaSempatikDeriYan?tlar?. TürkFiz. T?p ve Rehab. Derg. , 49
  16. :18-23, 2003. Turkish.
  17. Aramaki S, KiraY, Hirasawa Y. A Study of the normal values and habituation phenomenon of sympathetic skin response. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. , 76: 2-7, 1997.
  18. Denišli? M, Meh D. Sympathetic skin response in Parkinsonian patients. ElectromyogrclinNeurophysiol 1996; 36: 231-235.
  19. Elie B, Guiheneuc P. Sympathetic skin response: normal results in different experimental conditions. ElectroencephClinNeurophysiol 1990; 76:258-267.
  20. Braune HJ. Early detection of diabetic neuropathy: a neurophysiological study on 100 patient. ElectromyogrClinNeurophysiol 1997; 37: 399-407.
  21. Aygül R, Ulvi H, Deniz O. NormallerdeSempatikDeriCevab?DalgaFormlar?, ?nönüÜniversitesi T?p FakültesiDergisi, 12
  22. 77-82
  23. . Turkish.
  24. Tokoyura M. Waveform and habituation of smypathetic skin response. ElectroencephClinNeurophysiol 1998; 109: 178-183.
  25. Vetrugno R, Liguori R, Cortelli P, Montagna P. Sympathetic skin response: basis mechanisms and clinical applications. ClinAuton Res. 2003; 13:256-270.
  26. Dumitru D, Zwarts MJ. Special Nerve Conduction Techniques. In: Dumitru D, Amato AA, Zwarts MJ, ed, Electrodiagnostic Medicine, 2nded, Philadelphia, Hanley &Belfus, Inc, 2002; 225-256.
  27. Ertekin C, Ertekin N, Mutlu S, Almis S, Akcam A. Skin potentials [SP] recorded from the extremities and genital regions in normal and impotent subjects. ActaNeurolScand 1987; 76: 28-36.
  28. Zhu GY, Shen Y. Sympathetic skin response: a new test to diagnose erectile dysfunction. Asia J Androl 2001 Mar; 3
  29. : 45-48.
  30. Chu NS. Recovery of sympathetic skin response after digit-to-digit replantation and toe-to-digit transplantation in humans. Ann Neurol 1996; 40: 67-74.
  31. Elie B, Guiheneuc P. Sympathetic skin response: normal result in different experimental condition. ElectroencephalogrClinNeurophysiol. 1990; 76:258-267.
  32. Aydemir K. Reflekssempatikdistrofisendromlu el olgular?ndainvazive non-invaziv stellar ganglion blokajuygulamlar?n?ntens+egzersizterapisiilekar??la?t?r?lmas?n?nsempatikderiyan?tlar?yoluylaölçülmesi. Uzmanl?kTezi, Ankara 2004. Turkish.
  33. Akyüz G. OtonomSinirSistemiElektrofizyolojisi. Fiziksel T?p veRehabilitasyon, [Eds]Beyazova M, Kutsal Y. , Güne?Kitapevi Ltd. ?ti. Ankara, cilt I, 560-569, 2000.
  34. Türkdo?an D, Akyüz G. Otonomsinirsistemielektrofizyolojisi. In: Akyüz G, Özaras N, Gündüz H, Ofluo?lu D, Elektrodiagnoz. 1 st ed. Ankara: Güne?kitapevi, 2003; 437-463. . Turkish.
  35. Resende LAL, Matarazzo AT, Kimaid PAT, Silva MD. Reconsideration about the clinical importance of the skin sympathetic response. ElectromyogrClinNeurophysiol 1997; 37: 463-468.
  36. Drory VE, Korczyn AD. Sympathetic skin response: Age effect. Neurology 1993; 43: 1818-1820.
  37. Baba M, Watahiki Y, Matsunaga M, Tabeke K. Sympathetic skin response in healty man. ElectromyogrClinNeurophysiol 1988; 28: 277-283.
  38. Macleod AF, Smith SA, Cowell T, Richardson PR, Sonksen PH. Non-cordiac autonomic test in diabetes: use of galvanic skin response. Diabetic Med 1991; 8 Symposium: S67-S70.
  39. Zakrzewska-Paniewska B, Kaminska A, Kostera-Pruszczyk A. Sympathetic skin response [SSR] in mutiple sclerosis. NeuroNeurochir Pol 1996; Supple 3: 121-128.
  40. Haapaniemi TH, Korpelainen JY, Tolonen U, Suominen K, Sotaniemi KA, Mylly VV. Suppressed smpathetic skin response in Parkinson disease. ClinAuton Res 200 Dec; 10
  41. : 337-342.
  42. Elie B, LouboutinJp. Sympathetic skin response [SSR] is abnormal in multiple sclerosis. Muscle Nerve 1995; 18: 185-189.
  43. Rossini PM, Massa R, Sancesairo G, Boccasena P. Sudomotor skin response to brain stimulation do not depend on nerve sensory fiber functionality. ElectroencephalogrClinNeurophysiol 1993; 89: 447-451.
  44. Rossini PM, Opsomer RJ, Boccasena P. Sudomotorskin response following nerve and brain stimulation. ElectroencephalogrClinNeurophysiol 1993; 89: 442-446.
  45. Linden D, Weng Y, Glocker FX, Kretzschmar A, Diehl RR, Berlit P. Sympathetic skin response evoked by magnetic stimulation of neck: normative data. Muscle Nerve 1996; 19: 1487-1489.
  46. Niehaus L, Meyer BU, Roricht S. Magnetic stimulation over different brain regions: no differential effects on the elicited sympathetic skin response. ElectroencephalogrClinNeurophysiol 1998; 109: 94-99.
  47. Toyokura M. Influence of stimulus intensity on waveform of sympathetic skin response evoked by magnetic stimulation. ClinNeurophysiol 2003 Aug; 114
  48. : 1423-1430.
  49. Marcello N, Baratti M, Ortaggio F, Vescovini E, Zanoni P, Tugnoli V, De Grandis D. Sympathetic skin response in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. ElectromyogrClinNeurophtsiol 1995; 35: 659-664.
  50. Rossi P, Truini A, Serrao M, Lannetti GD, Parisi L, Pozzessere G, Cruccu G. Sympathetic skin response evoked by laser skin stimulation. FunctNeurol 2002 Jul-Sep; 17
  51. : 129-132.
  52. Cervera A, Veciana M, Valls-Sole J. Sympathetic sudomotor skin responses induced by laser stimuli in normal human subjects. NeurosciLett. 2002 Dec 13; 334
  53. : 115-118.
  54. Akyüz G. ElektrodiagnozOtonomsinirsistemielektrofizyolojisi. 2003:437-463.
  55. Çak?r T. ?nmelihastalardaelektromiyografiilereflekslerinvesempatikdericevab?n?nincelenmesivefonksiyonelkapasiteileili?kininbelirlenmesi. Uzmanl?kTezi. Afyonkarahisar 2008. Turkish.
  56. Yagiz A, Colakoglu Z, Hepguler S, Aksit R. Local heat effect on sympathetic skin response after pain of electrical stimulus. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 78: 1196-1199.
  57. Deltombe T, Hanson P, Jamart J, Clerin M. The influence of skin temperature on latency and amplitude of the sympathetic skin response in normal subjects.
  58. Maulsby RL, Edelberg R. The interrelationship between the galvanic skin responce, basal resistance, and tempature. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1960;53:475-9.
  59. Yokota T, Takahashi T, Kondo M Fujimori B. Studies on the diphasic wave form of the galvanic skin reflex. ElectroencephalogrClinNeuropysiol. 1959;11:687-696.
  60. Uncini A, Pullnan SL, Lovelace RE, Gambi D. The sympathetic skin response normal values, elucidation of afferent components and applicantion limits. J NeurolSci 1988; 87: 299-306.
  61. Gutrecht JA. Sympathetic skin response. J ClinNeurophysiol 1994; 11
  62. : 519-524.
  63. Raszewa M. Hausmanova-Petrusewicz I, Blaszczyk M, jablonska S. Sympathetic skin response in scleroderma. ElectromyogrClinNeurophysiol 1991; 131: 467-472.
  64. Miscio G, Pisano F. Sympathetic skin response in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. ActaNeurolScand 1998; 98: 276-279.
  65. Lin TK, Chee EC, Chen HJ, Cheng MH. Abnormal sympathetic skin response ,n patient with palmar hyperhidrosis. Muscle Nerve 1995; 18: 917-919.
  66. Milanl?o?lu A, Tombul T, Say?n R. Sympathetic skin response in migraineurs, Journal of Clinical and Experimental Invegtigations 2011; 2
  67. : 16-21.
  68. Neuman E, Blanton R. The early history electrodermal research. Psychophysiology 1970; 6:453-475.
  69. Kula H. Egzersizinsporcularda elektrodermal aktiviteüzerineetkisi. YüksekLisansTezi, Kayseri 2006. Turkish.
  70. Boucsein W. Electrodermal Activity. New York, Plenum Press, 1992: 1-372.
  71. Schmind S, Walach H. Electrodermal activity [EDA]- state of the art measurement and techniques for parapsychological purposes. The Journal of parapsychology 2000; 64: 139-163.
  72. Schm?dt S, Schneider R, B?nder M, Burkle D &Walach H. Investigating methodological issues in EDA DMILS: Results from a pilot study. The Journal of Parapsychology 2001; 65:59-82.
  73. Zakrzewska-Pniewska B, Jamrozik Z. Are electrophysiological autonomic tests useful in the assessment of dysautonomia in Parkinson's disease? Parkinsonism Rel D 2002; 9
  74. :179.
  75. Y?ld?z SK, Türko?lu ?A, Y?ld?z N, Öztürk A, Töre F: Sympathetic skin responses of the face and neck evoked by electrical stimulation Autonomic Neuroscience: Basic and Clinical 134
  76. 85–91.
  77. Özkan Ö, Yildiz M, Köklükaya E. "Fibromiyalji sendromununte?hisindekullan?lanlaboratuartestlerininsempatikdericevab?parametreleriyledesteklenerekte?hisdo?rulu?ununartt?r?lmas?", SAÜ. Fen BilimleriDergisi, 15. Cilt, 1. Say?, s. 1-7, 2011. Turkish.
  78. Boel K. RefleksSempatikDistrofiSendromluOlgulardaSempatikDeriYan?tlar?. Uzmanl?kTezi, Sivas 1999. Turkish.
  79. Do?ramac? AÇ, Okuyucu EE. Sympathetic skin response in patient with vitiligo, Turkderm-Archives of the Turkish Dermatology and Venerology, 2009; 43: 58-60.
  80. Çak?r T, Evcik D, Dündar Ü, Yi?it ?, Kavuncu V. Evaluation of sympathetic skin response and F wave in fibromyalgia syndrome patient, Turk J Rheumatol 2011;26
  81. :38-43 doi: 10. 5606/tjr. 2011. 006. Turkish.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Skin Response Sympathetic skin response electrodermal activity