We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

Rapid and Proactive Approach on Exploration of Bugs in Web based Software Development

by A. Ramachandran, T. C. Sankar, S. Ramachandran
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 72 - Number 13
Year of Publication: 2013
Authors: A. Ramachandran, T. C. Sankar, S. Ramachandran
10.5120/12552-9098

A. Ramachandran, T. C. Sankar, S. Ramachandran . Rapid and Proactive Approach on Exploration of Bugs in Web based Software Development. International Journal of Computer Applications. 72, 13 ( June 2013), 10-16. DOI=10.5120/12552-9098

@article{ 10.5120/12552-9098,
author = { A. Ramachandran, T. C. Sankar, S. Ramachandran },
title = { Rapid and Proactive Approach on Exploration of Bugs in Web based Software Development },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { June 2013 },
volume = { 72 },
number = { 13 },
month = { June },
year = { 2013 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 10-16 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume72/number13/12552-9098/ },
doi = { 10.5120/12552-9098 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T21:37:48.613577+05:30
%A A. Ramachandran
%A T. C. Sankar
%A S. Ramachandran
%T Rapid and Proactive Approach on Exploration of Bugs in Web based Software Development
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 72
%N 13
%P 10-16
%D 2013
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

One of the most difficult and important software quality assurance/testing tasks is to estimate the expected number of bugs in a given software module or a project. Good estimation methods are important for evaluating the project perform once in an optimized manner and deciding which quality assurance strategies are most appropriate and effective. The core objective of this paper is to define a combined testing strategy to identify the more defects and to validate the testing among code inspection and test driven development (TDD) using open source testing tools. Based on the test rules, evaluating the functionalities and the testing will be done automatically upon user acceptance. After evaluating the test cases, the results will be populated for further development. Though both the testing seem to give effective result in maximum level of testing when conducted individually, the best output by testing can be achieved through the combination of both, TDD and code sniffer testing. Our approach plays a major role in detecting and managing fault present in the software development. Implementation of this methodology proves to be cost effective and saves analyzing time. As a result this shows the improvement in the quality of the product of the software test finally satisfying the customers.

References
  1. Jerod W. Wilkerson, Jay F. Nunamaker Jr. , and Rick Mercer, Comparing the Defect Reduction Benefits of Code Inspection and Test-Driven Development, IEEE transactions on software engineering, Vol. 38, No. 3, 2012.
  2. B. Marick, The craft of software testing, Prentice Hall. 1995.
  3. P. M. Johnson, "An Instrumented Approach to Improving Software Quality through Formal Technical Review," Proc. 16th Int'l Conf. Software Eng. , pp. 113-22, 1994.
  4. Efficient Object-Oriented Integration and Regression Testing Yves Le Traon, Thierry Jéron, Jean-Marc Jézéquel, and Pierre Morel.
  5. A. A. Porter and L. G. Votta, "An Experiment to Assess Different Defect Detection Methods for Software Requirements Inspections," Proc. 16th Int'l Conf. Software Eng. , pp. 103-12, 1994.
  6. A. A. Porter, L. G. Votta Jr, and V. R. Basili, "Comparing Detection Methods for Software Requirements Inspections: A Replicated Experiment," IEEE Trans. Software Eng. , vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 563-575, June 1995.
  7. M. E. Fagan, "Advances in Software Inspections," IEEE Trans. Software Eng. , vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 744-51, July 1986.
  8. T. Gilb and D. Graham, Software Inspection. Addison-Wesley, 1993.
  9. W. S. Humphrey, A Discipline for Software Eng. , ser. the SEI Series in Software Engineering. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1995.
  10. W. S. Humphrey, Managing the Software Process, ser. The SEI Series in Software Engineering. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1989.
  11. B. George and L. Williams, "A Structured Experiment of Test-Driven Development," Information and Software Technology, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 337-342, 2004.
  12. E. M. Maximilien and L. Williams, "Assessing Test- Driven Development at IBM," Proc. 25th Int'l Conf. Software Eng. , pp. 564-9, 2003.
  13. N. Nagappan, M. E. Maximilien, T. Bhat, and L. Williams, "Realizing Quality Improvement through Test Driven Development: Results and Experiences of Four Industrial Teams," Empirical Software Eng. , vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 289-302, 2008.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Software Engineering Software Assessment Testing Ontology Code walkthrough Software Testing Test Driven Development (TDD) automated Code sniffer Refractor