CFP last date
20 January 2025
Call for Paper
February Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming February edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 January 2025

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
SFLA-Based Line Balancing and Task Optimization in Master-Slave Controlled Hanger Transportation Systems for Garment Production

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

An Efficient Algorithm to Reduce the Semantic Gap between Image Contents and Tags

by Grishma Y. Bobhate, Usha A. Jogalekar
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 72 - Number 11
Year of Publication: 2013
Authors: Grishma Y. Bobhate, Usha A. Jogalekar
10.5120/12541-9136

Grishma Y. Bobhate, Usha A. Jogalekar . An Efficient Algorithm to Reduce the Semantic Gap between Image Contents and Tags. International Journal of Computer Applications. 72, 11 ( June 2013), 38-44. DOI=10.5120/12541-9136

@article{ 10.5120/12541-9136,
author = { Grishma Y. Bobhate, Usha A. Jogalekar },
title = { An Efficient Algorithm to Reduce the Semantic Gap between Image Contents and Tags },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { June 2013 },
volume = { 72 },
number = { 11 },
month = { June },
year = { 2013 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 38-44 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume72/number11/12541-9136/ },
doi = { 10.5120/12541-9136 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T21:37:41.098163+05:30
%A Grishma Y. Bobhate
%A Usha A. Jogalekar
%T An Efficient Algorithm to Reduce the Semantic Gap between Image Contents and Tags
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 72
%N 11
%P 38-44
%D 2013
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

With the rapid growth in the new era of Internet Technology, image retrieval is an active and traditional method for searching the images by keywords or by images from the large amount of image database. As tags gives the descriptive information of an image on the web. Due to noisy nature in tags, it becomes necessary to correlate both image content and tag information for retrieval purposes. However, semantic gap is a major problem in the image processing concept. Therefore, our presented research is going to reduce the problem of semantic gap by applying techniques to extract low level features of an image such as color, texture and edge. Then, construction of a mixed graph between image and tag to perform random walk on graph for getting accurate results in an efficient way. Experimental results show the effectiveness of our approach.

References
  1. Sridhar, Gowri. 2012. Color and Texture Based Image Retrieval ARPN Journal of System and Software, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp 1?6.
  2. P. Nagarani, R. VenkataRamanaChary and Dr. D. Rajya Lakshmi 2012. Semantic Based Image Annotation Using Descriptive Features and Retagging approach, International Journal of Multimedia Its Applications (IJMA), Vol. 4, No. 1, pp 15?26.
  3. Yin-Hsi Kuo, Wen-Huang Cheng, Member, IEEE, Hsuan-Tien Lin, Member, IEEE, and Winston H. Hs. 2012. Unsupervised Semantic Feature Discovery for Image Object Retrieval and Tag Refinement, Transactions on Multimedia, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp 1079?1090.
  4. Sowmya Rani, Rajani N. , and Swathi Reddyi. 2012. Comparative Study on Content Based Image Retrieval, International Journal of Future Computer and Communication, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp 366?368.
  5. Hao Ma, Jianke Zhu, Michael Rung-Tsong Lyu, and Irwin King. 2010. Bridging the Semantic Gap Between Image Contents and Tags, IEEE Transactions On Multimedia, Vol. 12, No. 5, pp 462?473.
  6. L. Wu, L. Yang, N. Yu, and X. -S. Hua. 2009. Learning to Tag, In Proceedings of ACM of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW 2009), pp 361?370.
  7. R. Datta, D. Joshi, J. Li, and J. Z. Wang. 2008. Image Retrieval: Ideas, Influences, and Trends Of The New Age, ACM Computing Survey. Vol. 40, No. 2, pp 1? 60.
  8. C. Wang, L. Zhang, and H. -J. Zhang. 2008. Learning to reduce the semantic gap in web image retrieval and annotation, In Proc. SIGIR, pp. 355?362.
  9. G. Carneiro, A. B. Chan, P. J. Moreno, and N. Vasconcelos. 2007 Supervised learning of semantic classes for image annotation and retrieval, Transaction on pattern analysis and machine Intelligence (PAMI), pp 394?410.
  10. S. Arivazhagan, L. Ganesan, and S. P. Priyal. 2006. Texture classification using Gabor wavelets based rotation invariant features, Pattern recognition letters, Vol. 27, Issue No. 16, pp 1976?1982.
  11. Leo Grady. 2006. Random Walks for Image Segmentation, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 28, No. 11, pp 1?17.
  12. Najlae Idrissi, Jose Martinez and Driss Aboutajdine, 2009. Bridging the Semantic Gap for Texture-based Image Retrieval and Navigation, Journal of Multimedia, Vol. 4, No. 5, pp 277?283.
  13. Dengsheng Zhang, Aylwin Wong, Maria Indrawan, Guojun Lu. 2006. Content-based Image Retrieval Using Gabor Texture Features, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 28, No. 11.
  14. Yining Deng, B. S. Manjunath, Charles Kenney, Michael S. Moore and Hyundoo Shin. 2001. An Efficient Color Representation for Image Retrieval, IEEE Transactions On Image Processing, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp 140?147.
  15. Yuanhua Lv and ChengXiang Zhai, 2010. Positional Relevance Model for Pseudo-Relevance Feedback ACM, Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval (SIGIR), pp 579?586.
  16. Xiang Sean Zhou, Thomas S. Huang. 2003. Relevance Feedback in Image Retrieval: A Comprehensive Review Multimedia Systems, Springer-Verlag, Vol. 8, No. 6, pp 536?544.
  17. Shu Liao and Albert C. S. Chung. 2007. Texture Classification By Using Advanced Local Binary Patterns And Spatial Distribution Of Dominant Patterns, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Vol. 1, pp I?1221 ? I?1224. .
  18. Li, J. and J. Wang. 2003. Automatic linguistic indexing of pictures by a statistical modeling approach, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 25, No. 9, pp 1075?1088.
  19. Jeon, J. , V. Lavrenko, and R. Manmatha. 2003. Automatic image annotation and retrieval using cross media relevance models, In: Proc. ACM SIGIR Conf. Research and Development in Information Retrieval. New York, NY, USA, pp. 119 ?126.
  20. P. Duygulu, K. Barnard, J. F. G. de Freitas, and D. A. Forsyth. 2002. Object recognition as machine translation: Learning a lexicon for a fixed image vocabulary, In ECCV 2002: Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Computer Vision-Part IV, Springer-Verlag, pp 97?112.
  21. Blei, D. M. and M. I. Jordan. 2003. Modeling annotated data. In: Proc. ACM SIGIR. pp. 127?134.
  22. S. Arya, D. M. Mount, N. S. Netanyahu, R. Silverman, and A. Y. Wu. 1998. An optimal algorithm for approximate nearest neighbor searching fixed dimensions, Journal of ACM, 45(6): pp 8914-923.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Random Walk Semantic Gap

Powered by PhDFocusTM