CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

Potential Hospital Location Selection using AHP: A Study in Rural India

by Debmallya Chatterjee, Bani Mukherjee
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 71 - Number 17
Year of Publication: 2013
Authors: Debmallya Chatterjee, Bani Mukherjee
10.5120/12447-9144

Debmallya Chatterjee, Bani Mukherjee . Potential Hospital Location Selection using AHP: A Study in Rural India. International Journal of Computer Applications. 71, 17 ( June 2013), 1-7. DOI=10.5120/12447-9144

@article{ 10.5120/12447-9144,
author = { Debmallya Chatterjee, Bani Mukherjee },
title = { Potential Hospital Location Selection using AHP: A Study in Rural India },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { June 2013 },
volume = { 71 },
number = { 17 },
month = { June },
year = { 2013 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 1-7 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume71/number17/12447-9144/ },
doi = { 10.5120/12447-9144 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T21:35:48.264474+05:30
%A Debmallya Chatterjee
%A Bani Mukherjee
%T Potential Hospital Location Selection using AHP: A Study in Rural India
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 71
%N 17
%P 1-7
%D 2013
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Selecting a location for a potential hospital often decides the success or the failure of such a facility. It is thus important to assess the locations from multiple dimensions before selecting the site. This paper focuses on the multi factor evaluation of hospital sites using Analytical Hierarchy process (AHP)and evaluates three potential rural hospital sites in India. This study considered three major factors and eleven sub factors in the evaluation. Findings show that among the sub factors, cost of land, population density and proximity to public transport evolved as the three most significant sub factors.

References
  1. Altay, A. 2008. A Rating Approach to the Solutions of Istanbul Traffic. in IEMC Europe 2008: Proceedings of Engineering Management Conference, pp. 1-4. (Accessed on 26 Dec 2009, http://ieeexplore. ieee. org)
  2. Atthirawong, W and McCarthy, B. 2002. An Application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process to International Location Decision-Making. Proceedings of 7th annual Cambridge International Manufacturing Symposium: Restructuring overall manufacturing, University of Cambridge, England, pp. 1-18.
  3. Grandzol J. R. 2005. Improving the Faculty Selection Process in Higher Education: A Case for the Analytic Hierarchy Process. paper presented at Association for Institutional Research, Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, United States, 24 August, 2005.
  4. Grewal, C. S. , Sareen, K. K. and Gill, S. 2008. A multifactor logistic outsourcing decision making using the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 1-13.
  5. Guagliardo, M. 2004. Spatial accessibility of primary care: concepts, methods and challenges. International Journal of Health Geographics, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp 1-13.
  6. Hanes, P. J. and McKnight, C. M. 1984. Criteria for selection of a practice location among senior dental students at the University of Mississippi. Journal of Dental Education, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 102-104.
  7. Jesuk, K. 2005. Solving distribution facility location problem using an analytic hierarchy process approach. Paper presented at ISAHP, Honolulu, Hawaii, 8-10 July 2005.
  8. Jordan, H. ,Roderick, P. , Martin, D. and Barnett, S. 2004. Distance, rurality and the need for care: access to health services in South West England. International Journal of Health Geographics, Vol. 3, No. 21, pp. 1-9.
  9. Korkmaz, I. , Hadi, G. and Tahsin, C. 2008. An analytic hierarchy process and two-sided matching based decision support system for military personnel assignment. Information Sciences, Vol. 178 No. 14, pp. 2915–2927.
  10. Kuo, R. , Chi, S. and Kao, S. 1999. A decision support system for locating convenience store through fuzzy AHP. Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 37 No. 3, pp. 323–326.
  11. Medical facility: Burdwan district. http://www. bardhaman. gov. in/health/medifaci. html (Accessed on 31st January 2013)
  12. Mehrez, A. ,Sinuany-Stern, Z. , Arad-Geva, T. and Binyamin, S. 1996. On the Implementation of Quantitative Facility Location Models: The Case of a Hospital in a Rural Region. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 47 No. 5, pp. 612-625.
  13. Ozden, B. and Birsen, K. 2005. An AHP application in vendor selection. Presented at ISAHP 2005, Honolulu, Hawaii, 8-10 July 2005.
  14. Paul, A. J. and Batta, R. 2008. Models for hospital location and capacity allocation for an area prone to natural disasters. International Journal of operations research, Vol. 3 No. 5, pp. 473-496.
  15. Paul, D. P. 1997. Dental practice location: Some aspects of the importance of selection of place. Health Marketing Quarterly, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 55–69.
  16. Pavlikakis, G. E. and Tsihrintzis, V. A. 2003. Evaluation of three multi-factor methods in ecosystem management. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology, Lemnos Island, Greece, 8 -10 September 2003.
  17. Population: Burdwan district, http://www. bardhaman. gov. in/census/popliterate. html (Accessed on 31st January 2013).
  18. Project Charter Site Validation, Children's Hospital of Saskatchewan, 2010, http://chssitevalidation. files. wordpress. com/2010/02/project-charter2. pdf, (Accessed on 24th December 2012).
  19. Saaty, T. L. 2000. Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory, 2nd ed. ,RWS Publications, Pittsburgh.
  20. Saaty, T. L. 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process, Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation, McGraw Hill, New York, 1980.
  21. Schuurman, N. , Fiedler, R. S. , Grzybowski, S. , and Grund, D. 2006. Defining rational hospital catchments for non-urban areas based on travel-time. International Journal of Health Geographics,http://www. ij-healthgeographics. com/content/5/1/43(Accessed on 24th December 2012)
  22. Shim, J. P. 1989. Bibliographical research on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Vol. 23 No. 3,pp. 161–167.
  23. Sinimole, K. R. 2012, Performance evaluation of the hospital services – a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process model, International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 112–130.
  24. Soltani, A. , Marandi, E. Z. 2011. Hospital site selection using two stage fuzzy multi-criteria decision making process. Journal of Urban andenvironmental engineering, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 32-43.
  25. Triantaphyllou, E. and Mann, S. H. 1995. Using the analytical hierarchy process for decision making in engineering applications: some challenges. International Journal of Industrial Engineering: Applications and Practice, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 35-44.
  26. Vahidnia, M. H. , Alesheikh, A. and Alimohammadi, A. 2009. Hospital site selection using fuzzy AHP and its derivatives. Journal of environmental management, Vol. 90 No. 10, pp. 3048-3056.
  27. Varnakovida, P. and Messina, J. P. 2006. Hospital Site Selection Analysis. In Proceedings of the IMAGIN annual Conference, 2006. http://citeseerx. ist. psu. edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10. 1. 1. 121. 4330 (Accessed on 24th January 2013)
  28. World Health statistics 2012. http://www. who. int/gho/publications/world_health_statistics/2012/en/index. html (accessed on 24th January 2013)
  29. Wu, C. R. , Lin, C. and Chen, H. 2007. Optimal selection of Taiwanese hospitals to ensure a competitive advantage by using analytical hierarchy process and sensitivity analysis. Building and environment, Vol. 42 No. 3, pp. 1431-1444.
  30. Yang, J. and Shi, P. 2002. Applying Analytic Hierarchy Process in Firm's Overall Performance Evaluation: A Case Study in China. International Journal of Business, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 30-46.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Hospital location AHP multi factor evaluation pair wise comparison selection expert opinion