We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

Lung Cancer Treatment Decision-Making by Descriptive Decision-Making Framework

by Elhum Nusrat, Koichi Yamada
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 67 - Number 3
Year of Publication: 2013
Authors: Elhum Nusrat, Koichi Yamada
10.5120/11372-6638

Elhum Nusrat, Koichi Yamada . Lung Cancer Treatment Decision-Making by Descriptive Decision-Making Framework. International Journal of Computer Applications. 67, 3 ( April 2013), 1-8. DOI=10.5120/11372-6638

@article{ 10.5120/11372-6638,
author = { Elhum Nusrat, Koichi Yamada },
title = { Lung Cancer Treatment Decision-Making by Descriptive Decision-Making Framework },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { April 2013 },
volume = { 67 },
number = { 3 },
month = { April },
year = { 2013 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 1-8 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume67/number3/11372-6638/ },
doi = { 10.5120/11372-6638 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T21:23:39.531957+05:30
%A Elhum Nusrat
%A Koichi Yamada
%T Lung Cancer Treatment Decision-Making by Descriptive Decision-Making Framework
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 67
%N 3
%P 1-8
%D 2013
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

The need of shared decision-making has been discussed by researchers since last few decades and is being practiced in several fields. Medical field is also experiencing its consequent positive impact. Keeping this ongoing trend in mind, this paper proposes a theory-based approach of descriptive decision-making (DM) under the realm of uncertainty along with its application to DM of treatment alternative of newly-diagnosed lung cancer patients. The novelty of this paper is: (1) A discussion on our proposed descriptive decision-making framework that holds the option of incorporating multiple sources of information and a distinctive rule for combining these evidences originated from multiple sources, (2) an application of this DM framework to discuss the variability of decisions regarding treatments of newly-diagnosed lung cancer patients based on their attitudes towards uncertainty.

References
  1. Simon, H. A. , 1955, A behavioral model of rational choice, Quarterly J. of Economics, 99-118.
  2. Hanssen, S. O. , 1994, Decision Theory-A Brief Introduction, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, 6-15.
  3. Allais, M. , 1979. The so-called Allais paradox and rational decisions under uncertainty, in Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox, eds. M. Allais and O. Hagen (Reidel, Dordrecht), 437–681.
  4. Ellsberg, D. , 1961. Risk, ambiguity and the Savage axioms, Quarterly J. of Economics 75, 643-669.
  5. Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. , 1979 Prospect Theory: An analysis of decision under risk, Econometrica,Vol. 47(2), 263-292.
  6. Nusrat, E. and Yamada, K. , 2013. A descriptive decision-making model under uncertainty: combination of Dempster-Shafer Theory and prospect theory, Int. J. Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-based Systems, Vol. 21 (1), 79-102.
  7. Chilton, F. and Collett, R. A. , 2008. Treatment choices, preferences and decision-making by patients with rheumatoid arthritis, Musculoskeletal Care, Vol. 6(1), 1-14.
  8. Wagner, E. H. et. al. , 1995. The effect of a shared decision making program on rates of surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia, Med. Care, Vol. 33, 765-770.
  9. Davidson, B. J. and Goldberg, S. L. , 2003. Decisional regret and quality of life after participating in medical decision-making for early-stage prostate cancer, BJU Intl. 91,14-17.
  10. Hellenthal, N. and Ellison, L. , 2008. How patients make treatment choices, Nature Clinical Practice Urology, Vol. 5, No. 8.
  11. Shafer, G. , 1976, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  12. Nusrat, E. and Yamada, K. , 2012. An Approach of Lung Cancer Staging by Weighted Average and Reliability based Rule of Evidence Combination, J. of Advanced Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics (submitted).
  13. Knight, F. H. , 1921, Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit. Houghton Mifflin, New York.
  14. Wakker, P. , 2010, Prospect Theory for Risk and Ambiguity, Cambridge university press, New York.
  15. Schmeidler, D. 1989. Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity, Econometrica, Vol. 57, No. 3, 571-587,.
  16. Quiggin, J. , 1982. A theory of anticipated utility, J. Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 3, 323-343.
  17. Yager, R. R. , 2004. Uncertainty modeling and decision support, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 85, 341-354.
  18. Yager, R. R. , 1992. Decision making under Dempster-Shafer uncertainties, Int. J. of General Systems, Vol. 20, 233-245.
  19. Yager, R. R. , 1988. On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making, IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol. 18, 183-190.
  20. Tacnet, J. M. and Dezert, J. , 2011. Cautious OWA and evidential reasoning for decision making under uncertainty, in Proc. 14th Int. Conf. on Information Fusion ,Chicago, USA.
  21. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. , 1992. Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty, J. of Risk and Uncertainty Vol. 5, 297-323.
  22. Tamura, H. , 2005. Behavioral models for complex decision analysis, European J. of Operational Research, Vol. 166, 655-665.
  23. Tamura, H. and Miura, Y. , 2006. Value judgment of the sense of security for nursing care robots based on the prospect theory under uncertainty, Int. J. of Knowledge and System Sciences, Vol. 3, 28-33.
  24. Dubois, D. and Prade, H. , 1982. On several representations of uncertain body of evidence, in Fuzzy Information and Decision Process, M. M. Gupta and E. Sanchez, Eds. , North Holland publication, Amsterdam, 167-181.
  25. Neilson, W. and Stowe, J. , 2002. A further examination of cumulative prospect theory parameterizations, The J. of Risk and Uncertainty, Vol. 24 (1), 31-46.
  26. Nusrat, E. and Yamada, K. , 2011. Different decision attitudes in decision-making under uncertainty, Congress of The Shin-Etsu Chapter of IEEE, The IEEE Shin-etsu Session, p. 186, Niigata, Japan.
  27. Murphy, C. K. , 2000, Combining belief functions when evidence conflicts, Decision Support Systems 29, 1–9.
  28. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, USA.
  29. Dempster, A. P. , 1967, "Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping," Ann. of Math. Statist. 38, 325–339.
  30. Nusrat, E. , Yamada, K. and Das, S, 2012. A Descriptive Decision-making Model of Patients' Treatment Decision using Dempster-Shafer Theory and Prospect Theory, Western Decision Sciences Institute 41st Annual Meeting, 302-307,Hawaii.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Uncertainty decision-making Dempster-Shafer theory Prospect Theory combination of evidences lung cancer diagnosis and staging.