We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

Ontology based Dynamic Customization for Composite Web Services

by Thirumaran. M, Dhavachelvan. P, Shanmugapriya. R
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 67 - Number 11
Year of Publication: 2013
Authors: Thirumaran. M, Dhavachelvan. P, Shanmugapriya. R
10.5120/11437-6577

Thirumaran. M, Dhavachelvan. P, Shanmugapriya. R . Ontology based Dynamic Customization for Composite Web Services. International Journal of Computer Applications. 67, 11 ( April 2013), 6-12. DOI=10.5120/11437-6577

@article{ 10.5120/11437-6577,
author = { Thirumaran. M, Dhavachelvan. P, Shanmugapriya. R },
title = { Ontology based Dynamic Customization for Composite Web Services },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { April 2013 },
volume = { 67 },
number = { 11 },
month = { April },
year = { 2013 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 6-12 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume67/number11/11437-6577/ },
doi = { 10.5120/11437-6577 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T21:24:21.833470+05:30
%A Thirumaran. M
%A Dhavachelvan. P
%A Shanmugapriya. R
%T Ontology based Dynamic Customization for Composite Web Services
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 67
%N 11
%P 6-12
%D 2013
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

The emerging semantic web era makes the entire web, user friendly to the humans by shifting the producer centric paradigm to consumer centric paradigm. Enhancing the web components still more user friendly increases its business value. For this purpose customization has to be done at runtime to provide sophisticated service to the business people and the customers. Business process Customization done for business goal analysis with BPEL, OWL, has shifted to OWL-BPC [web ontology language for business process customization] based on semantic markup language for web based information. We represent the conceptualization in an Extensible Markup Language (XML), based on the semantic markup language for Web-based information, i. e. , OWL. The novelty of the work done in this paper is Customization done during or after the runtime time. Enabling the customers to customize the service and process during Requirement process, design process and testing the correctness of process logic while deploying process, modifying dynamically, substituting services and handling Runtime Exceptions according to the rules as services requested by customers. The framework is designed to handle the runtime customization. Dynamic customization is emphasized in the paper and it is the advantage of the proposed approach. We present an architectural description of the problem as a validation of the proposed approach.

References
  1. Qianhui Liang, Xindong Wu, E. K. Park, TaghiM. Khoshgoftaar and Chi-Hung Chi, "Ontology-Based Business Process Customization for Composite Web Services," IEEE Transaction . , vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 717-728, July 2011.
  2. Yajing Zhap, TuPeng, "Ontology Classification for Semantic-Web-Based Software Engineering", Journal, Vol. 2, Pg. 303 – 307, oct-dec. 2009.
  3. A. Naeve, "The human semantic Web: Shifting from knowledge push to knowledge pull," J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst. (IJSWIS), vol. 1, no. 3,pp. 1–30, 2005.
  4. KameshKumar, P. , " Harmonizing the business process customization using ontology," Advances in Engineering, Science and Management (ICAESM), 2012 International Conference. , pg 788 – 791, 30- 31 March 2012.
  5. Bulanov, P. ,"Business process customization using process merging techniques", Service-Oriented Computing and Applications (SOCA), 2011 IEEE International Conference . , pp. 1 – 4. 12-14 Dec. 2011.
  6. D. König, N. Lohmann, S. Moser, C. Stahl, and K. Wolf, "Extending the compatibility notion for abstract WS-BPEL processes," in Proc. 17th Int. Conf. World Wide Web, 2008, pp. 785–794.
  7. Q. Liang, X. Wu, and H. Lau, "Optimizing service systems based on application-level QoS," IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. , vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 108–121, Apr. –Jun. 2009.
  8. BPEL. [Online]. Available: http://www. oasisopen. org/committees/tc_home. php? wg_abbrev=wsbpel.
  9. OWL-S. [Online]. Available: http ://www. ai. sri. com/dam1/services/owl-s/1. 2 .
  10. OWL. [Online]. Available: http://www. w3. org/TR/owl-features/ .
  11. A. Naeve, M. Lytras, W. Nejdl, J. Harding, and N. Balacheff, "Advances of semantic Web for e-learning: Expanding learning frontiers," Brit. J. Educ. Technol. , vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 321–330, 2006.
  12. D. He and X. Wu, "Ontology-based feature weighting for biomedical literature classification," in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Inf. Reuse Integr. , 2006,pp. 280–285.
  13. R. Katz-Haas, "Ten guidelines for user-centered Web design," Usability Interface, vol. 5, no. 1, Jul. 1998. [Online]. Available: http://www. stcsig. org/usability/newsletter/9807-webguide. html
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Semantic web Consumer-centric Goal analysis Dynamic customization