CFP last date
20 January 2025
Call for Paper
February Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming February edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 January 2025

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
SFLA-Based Line Balancing and Task Optimization in Master-Slave Controlled Hanger Transportation Systems for Garment Production

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Performance Evaluation of Blind Equalization for Mel-LPC based Speech Recognition under Different Noisy Conditions

by M. Babul Islam, Md. Mahfuzur Rahman
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 65 - Number 4
Year of Publication: 2013
Authors: M. Babul Islam, Md. Mahfuzur Rahman
10.5120/10910-5839

M. Babul Islam, Md. Mahfuzur Rahman . Performance Evaluation of Blind Equalization for Mel-LPC based Speech Recognition under Different Noisy Conditions. International Journal of Computer Applications. 65, 4 ( March 2013), 4-8. DOI=10.5120/10910-5839

@article{ 10.5120/10910-5839,
author = { M. Babul Islam, Md. Mahfuzur Rahman },
title = { Performance Evaluation of Blind Equalization for Mel-LPC based Speech Recognition under Different Noisy Conditions },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { March 2013 },
volume = { 65 },
number = { 4 },
month = { March },
year = { 2013 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 4-8 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume65/number4/10910-5839/ },
doi = { 10.5120/10910-5839 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T21:17:44.487754+05:30
%A M. Babul Islam
%A Md. Mahfuzur Rahman
%T Performance Evaluation of Blind Equalization for Mel-LPC based Speech Recognition under Different Noisy Conditions
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 65
%N 4
%P 4-8
%D 2013
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

This study is aimed to develop a noise robust distributed speech recognizer (DSR) for real-world applications by employing Blind Equalization (BEQ) for robust feature extraction. The main focus of the work is to cope with different noisy environments in recognition phase. To realize this objective, Mel-LP based speech analysis has been used in speech coding on the linear frequency scale by applying a first-order all-pass filter instead of a unit delay. Mismatch between training and test phases is reduced through robust feature extraction and this is achieved by applying BEQ on Mel-LP cepstral coefficients as an effort to reduce additive noise and channel distortion. The performance of the proposed system has been evaluated on test set A and set C of Aurora-2 database. The baseline performance, that is, for Mel-LPC the average word accuracy has found to be 59. 05% and 63. 99% for sets A and C, respectively. By applying the BEQ on Mel-LP cepstral coefficients, the performance has been improved to 65. 66% and 64. 65% for sets A and C, respectively.

References
  1. Bateman, D. C. , et al. , 1992. Spectral contrast normalization and other techniques for speech recognition in noise. Proc. of ICASSP '92, I: 241-244.
  2. Vaseghi, S. V. and B. P. Milner, 1993. Noise-adaptive hidden Markov models based on Wiener filters. Proc. of Eurospeech '93, II: 1023-1026.
  3. Islam, M. B. , K. Yamamoto, H. Matsumoto, 2007. Mel-Wiener filter for Mel-LPC based speech recognition. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, E90-D (6): 935-942.
  4. Boll, S. F. , 1979. Suppression of acoustic noise in speech using spectral subtraction. IEEE Trans. Acoust. , Speech and Signal Processing, 27(2): 113-120.
  5. Lim, J. S. and A. V. Oppenheim, 1979. Enhancement and bandwidth compression of noisy speech. Proc. of the IEEE, 67(2): 1586-1604.
  6. Lockwood, P. and J. Boudy, 1992. Experiments with a nonlinear spectral subtractor (nss), hidden Markov models and the projection or robust speech recognition in cars. Speech Commun. , 11(2-3): 215-228.
  7. Agarwal, A. and Y. M. Cheng, 1999. Two-stage Mel-warped Wiener filter for robust speech recognition. Proc. of ASRU '99: 67-70.
  8. Zhu, Q. and A. Alwan, 2002. The effect of additive noise on speech amplitude spectra: A Quantitative analysis. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 9(9): 275-277.
  9. Atal, B. , 1974. Effectiveness of linear prediction characteristics of the speech wave for automatic speaker identification and verification. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 55(6): 1304-1312.
  10. Furui, S. , 1981. Cepstral analysis technique for automatic speaker verification. IEEE Trans. Acoust. , Speech and Signal Processing, ASSP-29: 254-272.
  11. Mokbel, C. , et al. , 1984. Compensation of telephone line effects for robust speech recognition. Proc. of ICSLP '94: 987-990.
  12. Rahman, M. M. , et al. , 2012. Performance evaluation of CMN for Mel-LPC based speech recognition in different noisy environments. International Journal of Computer Applications, 58(10): 6-10.
  13. Gales, M. J. F. and S. J. Young, 1993a. HMM recognition in noise using parallel model combination. Proc. of Eurospeech '93, II: 837-840.
  14. Gales, M. J. F. and S. J. Young, 1993b. Cepstral parameter compensation for HMM recognition in noise. Speech Communication, 12(3): 231-239.
  15. Varga, A. P. and R. K. Moore, 1990. Hidden Markov model decomposition of speech and noise. Proc. of ICASSP '90, 2: 845-848.
  16. Davis, S. and P. Mermelstein, 1980. Comparison of parametric representations for monosyllabic word recognition in continuously spoken sentences. IEEE Trans. on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, ASSP-28(4): 357-366.
  17. Hermansky, H. , 1987. Perceptual linear predictive (PLP) analysis of speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. , 87(4): 17-29.
  18. Virag, N. , 1995. Speech enhancement based on masking properties of the auditory system. Proc. ICASSP '95: 796-799.
  19. Itakura, F. and S. Saito, 1968. Analysis synthesis telephony based upon the maximum likelihood method. Proc. of 6th International Congress on Acoustics, Tokyo: C-5-5, C17-20.
  20. Atal, B. and M. Schroeder, 1968. Predictive coding of speech signals. Proc. of 6th International Congress on Acoustics, Tokyo: 21-28.
  21. Makhoul, J. and L. Cosell, 1976. LPCW: An LPC vocoder with linear predictive warping. Proc. of ICASSP '76: 446-469.
  22. Itahashi, S. and S. Yokoyama, 1987. A formant extraction method utilizing mel scale and equal loudness contour. Speech Transmission Lab. -Quarterly Progress and Status Report (Stockholm) (4): 17-29.
  23. Rahim, M. G. and B. H. Juang, 1996. Signal bias removal by maximum likelihood estimation for robust telephone speech recognition. IEEE Trans. on Speech and Audio Processing, 4(1): 19-30.
  24. Strube, H. W. , 1980. Linear prediction on a warped frequency scale. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. , 68(4): 1071-1076.
  25. Oppenheim, A. V. and D. H. Johnson, 1972. Discrete representation of signals. IEEE Proc. , 60(6): 681-691.
  26. Matsumoto, H. , et al. , 1998. An efficient Mel-LPC analysis method for speech recognition", Proc. ICSLP '98: 1051-1054.
  27. Zwicker, E. and E. Terhardt, 1980. Analytical expressions for critical band rate and critical bandwidth as a function. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. , 68: 1523-1525.
  28. Lindsay, P. H. and D. A. Norman, 1977. Human information processing: An introduction to psychology. 2nd Edn. , Academic Press.
  29. Nakagawa, S. , et al. , ed. , 2005. Spoken language systems. Ohmsha, Ltd. , Japan, ch. 7.
  30. Markel, J. and A. Gray, 1976. Linear prediction of speech. Springer-Verlag.
  31. Mauuary, L. , 1996. Blind equalization for robust telephone based speech recognition", Proc. EUSPICO '96: 125-128.
  32. Mauuary, L. , 1998. Blind equalization in the cepstral domain for robust telephone speech recognition. Proc. EUSPICO '98, 1: 359-363.
  33. Hirsch, H. G. and D. Pearce, 2000. The AURORA experimental framework for the performance evaluation of speech recognition systems under noisy conditions. Proc. ISCA ITRW ASR 2000: 181:188.
  34. Leonard, R. G. , 1984. A database for speaker independent digit recognition. ICASSP84, 3: 42. 11.
  35. ITU recommendation G. 712, 1996. Transmission performance characteristics of pulse code modulation channels.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Mel-LPC bilinear transformation BEQ Aurora 2 database

Powered by PhDFocusTM