We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 November 2024
Call for Paper
December Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming December edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 November 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
Reseach Article

Evaluating Strengths and Weaknesses of Agile Scrum Framework using Knowledge Management

by Naga Sri Morampudi, Gaurav Raj
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 65 - Number 23
Year of Publication: 2013
Authors: Naga Sri Morampudi, Gaurav Raj
10.5120/11221-6058

Naga Sri Morampudi, Gaurav Raj . Evaluating Strengths and Weaknesses of Agile Scrum Framework using Knowledge Management. International Journal of Computer Applications. 65, 23 ( March 2013), 1-6. DOI=10.5120/11221-6058

@article{ 10.5120/11221-6058,
author = { Naga Sri Morampudi, Gaurav Raj },
title = { Evaluating Strengths and Weaknesses of Agile Scrum Framework using Knowledge Management },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { March 2013 },
volume = { 65 },
number = { 23 },
month = { March },
year = { 2013 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 1-6 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume65/number23/11221-6058/ },
doi = { 10.5120/11221-6058 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T21:20:37.175337+05:30
%A Naga Sri Morampudi
%A Gaurav Raj
%T Evaluating Strengths and Weaknesses of Agile Scrum Framework using Knowledge Management
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 65
%N 23
%P 1-6
%D 2013
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

This paper exploits strengths and weaknesses of agile Scrum framework using knowledge management. An agile framework Scrum widely used as agile manufacturing process. Many organizations prefer Scrum to complete their work in time. It is hugely beneficial if Scrum get improvised or enhanced with new features so that projects get better results, the frequency of the failed projects in an organization will become less. To carry this research, here Knowledge Management (KM) framework phases used to analyse, identify the absent phases in Scrum framework. In order to introduce the absent phases, strengthen the Scrum framework KM transferring has considered. Knowledge transferring gives attention of the best practices suitable to the current Scrum framework such as RUP, SSM. These practices elected as the best methods for Scrum and again analysed the influence of the KM transferring. To improve the Scrum framework in the perspective of the building new knowledge, it considered the core capabilities of the KM building, checked the activities of Scrum framework as result identified the existed and absent activities in the Scrum. This paper also proves that knowledge management quiet useful to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of any development methodology.

References
  1. Abrahamsson, P. , Salo, O. , Ronkainen, J. , Warsta, J. 2002: Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis. VTT Technical report
  2. Aurum, R. J, Wohlin, C. and Handzic, (2003) M. Managing Software Engineering Knowledge, Springer Verlag, New York
  3. Boden A. , Avram, G. , Bannon, L. and Wulf, 2009, Knowledge Management in Distributed Software Development Teams – Does Culture Matter? University of Siegen University of Limerick, Fourth IEEE International Corporation
  4. Cho, J. 2008, Issues and Challenges of Agile Software Development with Scrum, Issues in Information Systems, Colorado State University, Pueblo, Volume IX, No. 2
  5. Deemer. P, Benefield . G, Larman . C and Vodde. B, (n. d. ) The Scrum Primer, Scrum Training Institute www. scrumalliance. org Accessed on 3rd July, 2012 . Available At http://www. scrumalliance. org/pages/what_is_scrum
  6. Hosono, K. 2006, Application of Knowledge Management to System Development, Fujitsu Science and Technology Journal.
  7. Holsapple C. W. and Joshi K. D, 1999, Description and Analysis of Existing KM Frameworks, IEEE Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
  8. Hsiangchu Lai, Tsai-Hsin Chu, 2000, Knowledge management: a review of theoretical frameworks and industrial cases proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference.
  9. Lai, H. and Chu, T. 2009, Knowledge Management: A Review of Theoretical Frameworks and Industrial Cases, Department of Information Management, Volume 7, Communications of the IBIMA
  10. Larman C. , 2004, Agile and Iterative Development: A Manager's Guide, Addison-Wesley Professional
  11. Nerur, S. and Baijepally, V. 2007, Theoretical Reflections on Agile Development Methodologies, Communications of the ACM 50
  12. Rational Software White Paper 2001, Rational Unified Process: Best Practices for Software Development Teams, Rational Software Development Company
  13. Schwaber, K. , Beedle. M, 2001, Agile Software Development with Scrum, Prentice Hall.
  14. Schwaber, 2004, Agile Project Management with Scrum, Microsoft Press.
  15. Szalvay, V. 2004, An Introduction to Agile Software Development, Danube Technologies, Danube Technologies.
  16. Williams . B, 2006, Soft Systems Methodology, the Kellogg Foundation.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Agile Scrum framework Knowledge Management framework Rational Unified Process Soft System Methodology Evaluation Matrix