We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 December 2024
Call for Paper
January Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming January edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 December 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Improved Shuffled Frog Leaping Algorithm with Self-Adaptive Shuffling for Fuzzy Logic PD+G Controller Optimization in Robotic Manipulators

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

University Websites: A Comparative Study of Universities in Karnataka

by Muralidhara B L, Amthul Hai
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 65 - Number 13
Year of Publication: 2013
Authors: Muralidhara B L, Amthul Hai
10.5120/10982-6136

Muralidhara B L, Amthul Hai . University Websites: A Comparative Study of Universities in Karnataka. International Journal of Computer Applications. 65, 13 ( March 2013), 5-11. DOI=10.5120/10982-6136

@article{ 10.5120/10982-6136,
author = { Muralidhara B L, Amthul Hai },
title = { University Websites: A Comparative Study of Universities in Karnataka },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { March 2013 },
volume = { 65 },
number = { 13 },
month = { March },
year = { 2013 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 5-11 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume65/number13/10982-6136/ },
doi = { 10.5120/10982-6136 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T21:18:40.012250+05:30
%A Muralidhara B L
%A Amthul Hai
%T University Websites: A Comparative Study of Universities in Karnataka
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 65
%N 13
%P 5-11
%D 2013
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Government websites provide a platform for efficient communication and access to public information. They are a useful tool to transparency and democracy because they enable stakeholders to easily interact with their service providers. The paper proposes to evaluate the websites of Universities in Karnataka State in terms of their compliance to the W3C guidelines, Guidelines for Government of India, and Proactive Disclosures according to Section IV of the Right to Information Act, 2005 of Government of India. Student-centric metrics are also introduced for evaluation. International guidelines, Government of India and RTI guidelines are essential guidelines for information dissemination to stakeholders of the Universities in Karnataka and hence are considered. For the purpose of investigation, the Universities in Karnataka are classified into five categories: Central Government Institutions, Traditional State Universities which are more than ten years old, Traditional State Universities which are less than ten years old, State Mono discipline Universities, and Private Universities. The classification is based on the scope, geographical area spanned, and the age of the University. The State of Karnataka is chosen for analysis as most of the classifications suggested are available in the State. It was found that Central Institutes and Private Universities adhere more to these guidelines than State Universities.

References
  1. Mishra D. S (2007). E-Governance as reform strategy for combating corruption in delivery of public services. Indian Journal of Public Administration. LIII (3).
  2. BhogleSrinivas (2009). E-Governance. Selected Readings on Information Technology Management: Contemporary Issues ed. George Kelley. Information Science Reference, New York.
  3. Shah Mrinalini (2007). E-Governance in India: Dram or reality? International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT). 3(2), 125-137.
  4. Bhuiyan H Shahjahan (2011). Modernizing Bangladesh public administration through e-governance: Benefits and challenges. 28, 54-65.
  5. Asiimsw Edgar Napoleon, Nena Lim (2010). Usability of Government websites in Uganda. Electronic Journal of e-Government. 8(1), 1-12.
  6. BaldersheimHarald, Morten Ogard (2008). Innovation in E-government: Analysis of municipal web pages in the Nordic countries. Information Polity. 13, 125-137.
  7. NaikGopal, Siddarth Joshi, K. P. Basavaraj (2012). Fostering inclusive growth through e-governance Embedded Rural Telecenters (EGERT) in India. Government Information Quarterly. 29, S82-S89.
  8. ParajuliJitendra (2007). A Content Analysis of Selected Government Web Sites: a Case Study of Nepal, The Electronic Journal of e-Government, Volume 5 Issue 1, pp 87-94
  9. Sonderling N E, T J D Bothma (2005). Developing the SAPS website for optimal service delivery. SA Jnl Libs & Info Sci. 71(1), 26-38.
  10. The World Wide Web Consortium (2008). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2. 0. Downloaded on 10th January, 2012 from http://www. w3. org/
  11. Government of India (2009). Guidelines for Indian Government websites. Downloaded on 15th January, 2012 from http://darpg. nic. in/
  12. Rorissa Abede, Devendra Potnis, Dawit Demissie (2010). A Comparative Study of Contents of e-government service websites of Middle East and North African (MENA) Countries. Comparative E-Government, Integrated Series in Information. LLC2010.
  13. Wigand F Dianne Lux (2010). Adoption of Web 2. 0 by Canadian and US Governments, Comparative E-Government, Integrated Series in Information, pp. 161-181
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

W3C RTI operability Government of India guidelines

Powered by PhDFocusTM