We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 November 2024
Call for Paper
December Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming December edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 November 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Improved Shuffled Frog Leaping Algorithm with Self-Adaptive Shuffling for Fuzzy Logic PD+G Controller Optimization in Robotic Manipulators

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Java Earthquake Program (JEP) to Predict the Recurrence Time of Significant Earthquake in Indonesia

by Ario Muhammad, Ratih Nur Esti Anggraini
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 64 - Number 9
Year of Publication: 2013
Authors: Ario Muhammad, Ratih Nur Esti Anggraini
10.5120/10660-5428

Ario Muhammad, Ratih Nur Esti Anggraini . Java Earthquake Program (JEP) to Predict the Recurrence Time of Significant Earthquake in Indonesia. International Journal of Computer Applications. 64, 9 ( February 2013), 6-12. DOI=10.5120/10660-5428

@article{ 10.5120/10660-5428,
author = { Ario Muhammad, Ratih Nur Esti Anggraini },
title = { Java Earthquake Program (JEP) to Predict the Recurrence Time of Significant Earthquake in Indonesia },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { February 2013 },
volume = { 64 },
number = { 9 },
month = { February },
year = { 2013 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 6-12 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume64/number9/10660-5428/ },
doi = { 10.5120/10660-5428 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T21:15:55.166102+05:30
%A Ario Muhammad
%A Ratih Nur Esti Anggraini
%T Java Earthquake Program (JEP) to Predict the Recurrence Time of Significant Earthquake in Indonesia
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 64
%N 9
%P 6-12
%D 2013
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

This paper developed the Java Earthquake Program (JEP) to predict the recurrence time of significant earthquake in Indonesia. The 59 events of significant earthquake in Indonesia were taken from the National Geophysical Data Center (NGDC) of United States. Five probabilistic models were used to represent the significant earthquake data in Indonesia. The models were tested by two goodness fit tests, Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) and Chi-Square test. The goodness of fit tests showed that gamma distribution is an appropriate model to represent the significant earthquake data in Indonesia. The JEP result shows that the next earthquake will be occurred on 64 days after the last hit earthquake. With the 7 days of error, it was confirmed that the range period of the next significant earthquake in Indonesia was on January 26 to February 9, 2013. This work successfully proved the reliability of the use of JEP to predict the Indonesia significant earthquake.

References
  1. Todd, D. 1996. The January 1, 1996 Indonesia Earthquake. EERI Newsletter, February 1996, Volume 30, Number 2, pp 5.
  2. Todd, D. 1996. The January 1, 1996 Indonesia Earthquake. EERI Newsletter, February 1996, Volume 30, Number 2, pp 5.
  3. Subandono Diposaptono, Rahman Hidayat, Nanang Tyas Puspito, Hamzah Latief, Fusuni, Fumihiko Imamura, and Andy Moore. 1996. The February 17, 1996 Irian Jaya earthquake and tsunami. EERI Special Report, May 1996, pp 11.
  4. Gregorius Sandjaja and Teddy Boen. 2000. M 6. 5 earthquake strikes Indonesia. EERI Newsletter, June 2000, Volume 34, Number 6, pp 5.
  5. Todd, D. 2000. Devastating earthquake strikes Sumatera. EERI Newsletter, July 2000, Volume 34, Number 7, pp 5.
  6. Azian Adnan, Hendriyawan, and Masyhur Irsyam. 2003. Effect of 11-2-02 Northern Sumatra Earthquake in Indonesia and Malaysia. EERI Newsletter, February 2003, Volume 27, Number 2, pp 4.
  7. Boen, T. 2004. Sumatra earthquake 26 December 2004. United State Geological Survey (USGS).
  8. Boen, T. 2005. The northern Sumatra earthquake of March 28, 2005. EERI Special Earthquake Report, August 2005, pp. 2-8.
  9. Bigman Hutapea, Sindhu Rudianto, F. X. Toha, and Hartono. 2006. The Mw 6. 3 Java, Indonesia, Earthquakeof 27, 2006. EERI Special Earthquake Report, August 2006, pp 1-8.
  10. Danny Hilman Natawidjaja, Adrin Tohari, Eko Subowo, and Mudrik R. Daryono. 2007. Western Sumatra earthquake of March 6, 27. EERI Special Earthquake Report, May 2007, pp 1-8.
  11. Briggs, R. 2007. 2007, Sumatra, Indonesia Earthquakes. EERI Newsletter, October 2007, Volume 41, Number 10, pp 2.
  12. Boen, T. 2008. Sumbawa, Indonesia, Earthquake of November 25, 2007. EERI Newsletter, January 2008, Volume 42, Number 1, pp 8.
  13. Yashinsky, M. 2009. February 11 M7. 2 EQ in Indonesia. EERI Newsletter, April 2009, Volume 43, Number 4, pp 9.
  14. Teddy Boen, Sugeng Wijanto, Takim Andirono, and Danny Hilman. 2009. Tme M7. 3 September 2, 2009, West Java quake. EERI Newsletter, October 2009, Vol. 43, Number 10, pp 4.
  15. Cedillos, V. 2010. Indonesian earthquake and tsunami. EERI newsletter, December 2010, Vo. 44, Number 12, pp 4.
  16. Dengler, L. 2012. April 11, 2012, M8+ Sumatra earthquakes. EERI Newsletter, May 2012, Vol. 46, Number 5, pp 10.
  17. Ferraes SG. 2005. A probabilistic prediction of the next strong earthquake in the Acapulco-San Marcos segment, Mexico. Geofisica Internacional 44: 347-353.
  18. Yilmaz V, Erisoglu M, Celik HE. 2004. Probabilistic prediction of the next earthquake in the NAFZ (North Anatolian Fault Zone), Turkey. Dogus Universitesi Dergisi 5: 243-250.
  19. Jafari MA. 2010. Statistical prediction of the next great earthquake around Tehran, Iran. Journal of Geodynamics 49: 14-18.
  20. Laura S, Lawrence H. 2009. A test of physical-based strong ground motion prediction methodology with the 26 September 1997, Mw = 6. 0 Colfiorita (Umbria-Marche sequence), Italy earthquake. Tectonophysics 476: 145-158.
  21. Wang JP, Wu YM, Lin TL, Brant L. 2012. The uncertainties of a Pd3-PGV onsite earthquake early warning system. Soil Dynamic and Earthquake Engineering 36: 32-37
  22. Ang A, Tang W. 2003. Probability concept in engineering: emphasis on applications to civil and environmental engineering, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. , New Jersey, pp 293–294.
  23. Chakravarti, Laha, and Roy. 1967. Handbook of Methods of Applied Statistics, Volume 1, Johnl Wiley and Sons, pp. 392-394.
  24. Utsu T. 1972. Large earthquakes near Hokkaido and the expectancy of the occurrence of a large earthquake of Nemuro: Report of the Coordinating Committee for Earthquake Prediction 7: 7-13.
  25. Hagiwara Y . 1974. Probability of earthquake occurrence as obtained from a Weibull distribution analysis of crustal strain. Tectonophysics 23: 323-318.
  26. Jafari MA . 2010. Statistical prediction of the next great earthquake around Tehran, Iran. Journal of Geodynamics 49: 14-18.
  27. Tripathi J. N . 2006. Probabilistic assessment of earthquake recurrence in the January 26, 2001 earthquake region of Gujarat. Indian Journal of Seismology 10: 119–130.
  28. Orfanogiannaki K, Papadopoulos G. A. 2007. Conditional probability approach of the assessment of Tsunami potential: application in three Tsunamigenic regions of the Pacific Ocean. Pure Appl. Geophys 164: 593–603.
  29. Benjamin J. R, CORNELL CA. 1970. Probability, Statistic, and Decision for Civil Engineers. McGraw- Hill.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Java earthquake program (JEP) gamma distribution K-S test Chi-Square test

Powered by PhDFocusTM