CFP last date
20 January 2025
Reseach Article

Feasibility of Development of an Immunization Management Tool for Mobile Phones by UCD Approach

by A Chowdhury, H Gebretsadik, S Kumar, R M Punekar
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 61 - Number 18
Year of Publication: 2013
Authors: A Chowdhury, H Gebretsadik, S Kumar, R M Punekar
10.5120/10030-5057

A Chowdhury, H Gebretsadik, S Kumar, R M Punekar . Feasibility of Development of an Immunization Management Tool for Mobile Phones by UCD Approach. International Journal of Computer Applications. 61, 18 ( January 2013), 26-31. DOI=10.5120/10030-5057

@article{ 10.5120/10030-5057,
author = { A Chowdhury, H Gebretsadik, S Kumar, R M Punekar },
title = { Feasibility of Development of an Immunization Management Tool for Mobile Phones by UCD Approach },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { January 2013 },
volume = { 61 },
number = { 18 },
month = { January },
year = { 2013 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 26-31 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume61/number18/10030-5057/ },
doi = { 10.5120/10030-5057 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T21:09:48.256211+05:30
%A A Chowdhury
%A H Gebretsadik
%A S Kumar
%A R M Punekar
%T Feasibility of Development of an Immunization Management Tool for Mobile Phones by UCD Approach
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 61
%N 18
%P 26-31
%D 2013
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Mobile phones are the most used accessories of people throughout the world and its uses are increasing day by day in India [20]. Due to advancement in the field of 'Human Computer Interaction (HCI)' in the last few decades, attention has been drawn to usability studies of mobile devices or mobile phone applications including user need identification, user need analysis, usability testing etc. In the area of health, Immunization as such has prime importance in human life especially to protect newborns and teenagers from life threatening diseases. In India, present immunization program involves pen-paper based routine immunization (RI) card which has several drawbacks in its use; such as, spoiling of RI card, RI card being lost etc. Due to these reasons vaccines have not been disseminated properly among children. However, technologycan assist in such man-made insensibilities, mistakes and inabilities. So, in this context, before any direct technological intervention in this domain of application, it is necessary to evaluate the feasibility of technological intervention to solve this problem by identifying user need. In this paper, an attempt has been made to evaluate user need identification for design and development of an electronic immunization management tool (IMT) for mobile phones under taking user centered design approach. The current paper describes user's responses and needs towards design and development of this tool that aims at inspiring people to give vaccines to their child properlyandboosting the existing immunization management system in near future.

References
  1. Abhisek, R. , Raman, S. , Mukhtar, M. , Ohri, E. , Saha-Mitra, S. and Sood, A. D. , 2011. Mobile Health Card: How to Use Mobile Phones to Increase Rural Immunization Rates. http://ebookbrowse. com/mobile-health-card-how-to-use-mobile-phones-to-increase-rural-immunization-rates-pdf-d214376725
  2. Anand, G. , 2011. India Turns to Mobile Phones in Bid to Improve Vaccination Rate. The Wall Street Journal, (August 2011). http://blogs. wsj. com/indiarealtime/2011/08/04/india-turns-to-mobile-phones-in-bid-to-improve-vaccination-rate/
  3. Angeli, A. D. , Sutcliffe, A. and Hartmann, J. , 2006. Interaction, usability and aesthetics: what influences users' preferences? In Proceeding DIS '06 Proceeding of the 6th conference on Designing Interactive systems
  4. Annual Report 2011-2012, Department of Health and Family Welfare, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. www. mohfw. nic. in
  5. Bai, Z. and Blackwell, A. F. , 2012. Analytic review of usability evaluation in ISMAR. Interact. Comput. , 24 (November 2012), 450-460.
  6. Burigat, S. and Chittaro, L. , 2011. Visualizing references to off-screen content on mobile devices: A comparison of Arrows, Wedge, and Overview + Detail. Interact. Comput. , 23 (February 2011), 156-166.
  7. Chen, C. A. , 2012. Discussion on increasing college teachers' willingness to adopt web-based learning in teaching. Bus. Manag. Res. , (July 2012), 1-8.
  8. Fiorella, D. , Sanna, A. and Lamberti F. , 2010. Multi-touch user interface evaluation for 3D object manipulation on mobile devices. J Multimodal User Interfaces, 4 (March 2010), 3-10.
  9. Gargar, M. and Whorter, R. M. , 2012. South Sudan deploys new mobile phone-based stock management tool. OP. TI. MIZE, 14 (October 2012), 1-12.
  10. Gulliksen, J. , Ransson, B. G. , Boivie, I. , Blomkvist, S. , Persson, J. And Cajander, A. S. , 2003. Key principles for user-centred systems design. Behav. Inform. Technol. , 22 (November–December 2003), 397-409.
  11. Hendersona, R. and Divett, M. J. , 2003. Perceived usefulness, ease of use and electronic supermarket use. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies, 59 (September 2003) 383–395.
  12. Hornbaek, K. , 2006. Current practice in measuring usability: Challenges to usability studies and research. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies, 64 (February 2006), 79-102.
  13. Kaikkonen, A. , Kallio, T. , Kekäläinen, A, Kankainen, A. , Cankar, M. , 2005. Usability Testing of Mobile Applications: A Comparison between Laboratory and Field Testing. Journal of Usability Studies, 1 (November 2005), 4-16.
  14. Law, E. L-C. , and van Schaik, P. , 2010. Modelling user experience – An agenda for research and practice. Interact. Comput. , 22 (September 2010), 313-322.
  15. Lindgaard, G. , Dillon, R. and Trbovich, P. (2006). User Needs Analysis and Requirements engineering: Theory and Practice. Interact. Comput. , 18 (January 2006), 47-70.
  16. List of countries by number of mobile phones in use. http://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of_mobile_phones_in_use
  17. Mao, J-Y. ,Vredenburg, K. , Smith, P. W. and Carey, T. , 2005. The State of User-centered Design Practice. Commun. ACM, 48 (March 2005), 105-109.
  18. Malhotra, N. K. and Dash, S. , 2011. Marketing Research. Dorling Kindersley (India) Pvt. Ltd.
  19. National Telecom Policy – 2012 (NTP - 2012). http://www. dot. gov. in/ntp/NTP-06. 06. 2012-final. pdf
  20. Pal, R. , 2012. Press Release No. 143/2012. Technical Report. Telecom Regulatory Authority of India at India.
  21. Rubin, J. and Chisnell, D. , 2008. Handbook of Usability Testing. Wiley Publishing, Inc.
  22. Usability Test Report for Mobile Applications, 2012. http://www. technical-direct. com/2012-05/usability-test-report-for-mobile. . .
  23. Whitea, R. , Fernandesa, G. , Lundahlb, S. and Pinnamaneni, A. , 2006. User Needs Analysis and requirements engineering: Theory and practice. Interact. Comput. , 18 (January 2006), 47-70.
  24. Yim, S. , Lee, S. and Choi, S. , 2011. Evaluation of motion-based interaction for mobile devices: A case study on image browsing. Interact. Comput. , 64, (February 2006), 79-102.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

HCI User Centered Design (UCD) Immunization Mobile Tool/ Application User survey User research