CFP last date
20 January 2025
Reseach Article

An Efficient Way to Enhance Mammogram Image in Transformation Domain

by T. A. Sangeetha, A. Saradha
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 60 - Number 2
Year of Publication: 2012
Authors: T. A. Sangeetha, A. Saradha
10.5120/9666-3826

T. A. Sangeetha, A. Saradha . An Efficient Way to Enhance Mammogram Image in Transformation Domain. International Journal of Computer Applications. 60, 2 ( December 2012), 35-41. DOI=10.5120/9666-3826

@article{ 10.5120/9666-3826,
author = { T. A. Sangeetha, A. Saradha },
title = { An Efficient Way to Enhance Mammogram Image in Transformation Domain },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { December 2012 },
volume = { 60 },
number = { 2 },
month = { December },
year = { 2012 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 35-41 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume60/number2/9666-3826/ },
doi = { 10.5120/9666-3826 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T21:05:35.051118+05:30
%A T. A. Sangeetha
%A A. Saradha
%T An Efficient Way to Enhance Mammogram Image in Transformation Domain
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 60
%N 2
%P 35-41
%D 2012
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Breast cancer is one of the most important causes of increased women death rate in the world. Mammography is the most efficient approach for the early identification of breast diseases. The major objective of mammography is to identify small, non-palpable cancers during its premature stage. On the other hand, mammograms are extremely complicated to interpret being the fact that the pathological transformations of the breast are slight and their visibility is very poor with low contrast and noise. Mammograms have the valuable information such as microcalcifications and masses, which are extremely complicated to identify because mammograms are of low-contrast. Since the mammogram images are very noisy, low-contrast, blur and fuzzy, it is necessary to enhance the mammogram images for accurate identification and early diagnosis of breast cancer. In this paper, proposed an efficient technique to enhance the mammogram image using various transforms. The various transforms are wavelet transform, Curvelet transform, contourlet transform, Nonsubsampled transform. The drawback of wavelet transform is the method in which problem of filling missing data will occur. In Curvelet method the disadvantage is poor directional specificity of the images. In contourlet transform the image enhancement cannot capture the geometric information of images and tend to amplify noises when they are applied to noisy images since they cannot distinguish noises from weak edges. This entire drawback is overcome by the Nonsubsampled Contourlet transform. In order to determine the effectiveness of the proposed technique, experiments were carried using two UCI machine learning dataset and evaluated based on the PSNR value and MSE.

References
  1. Temidayo O Ogundiran, Samuel A Ademola, Odunayo M Oluwatosin, Effiong E Akang and Clement A Adebamowo, "Primary osteogenic sarcoma of the breast", World Journal of Surgical Oncology, Published online: http://www. biomedcentral. com/content/pdf/1477-7819-4 90. pdf, 2006.
  2. Breast Cancer In-Depth Report, The Newyork Times, http://health. nytimes. com/health/guides/disease/breast cancer/print. html.
  3. Keir Bovis and Sameer Singh, "Enhancement Technique Evaluation using Quantitative Measures on Digital Mammograms", Proc. 5th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, Toronto, Canada, M. J. Yaffe (ed. ), Medical Physics Publishing, Pp. 547-553, 2000.
  4. R. Krishnamoorthy, N. Amudhavalli and M. K. Sivakkolunthu, "An Adaptive Mammographic Image Enhancement in Orthogonal Polynomials Domain", International Journal of Computer and Information Engineering, Vol. 4, No. 2, Pp. 120-128, 2010.
  5. C. D. Maggio, "State of the art of current modalities for the diagnosis of breast lesions," European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 31, pp. 56-69, 2004.
  6. Breast Cancer In-Depth Report, The Newyork Times, http://health. nytimes. com/health/guides/disease/breast cancer/print. html.
  7. R. Krishnamoorthy, N. Amudhavalli and M. K. Sivakkolunthu, "An Adaptive Mammographic Image Enhancement in Orthogonal Polynomials Domain", International Journal of Computer and Information Engineering, Vol. 4, No. 2, Pp. 120-128, 2010.
  8. M. J. Homer, Mammographic Interpretation: A Practical Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, 1991.
  9. ACS, "Cancer Prevention & Early Detection Facts & Figures 2008," 2008.
  10. G. Ram, "Optimization of ionizing radiation usage in medical imaging by means of image enhancement techniques," Medical Physics, vol. 9, pp. 733-737, 1982.
  11. H. D. Cheng, X. Cai, X. Chen, L. Hu, and X. Lou, "Computer-aided detection and classification of microcalcifications in mammograms: a survey," Pattern Recognition, vol. 36, pp. 2967-2991, 2003.
  12. H. D. Cheng, X. J. Shi, R. Min, L. M. Hu, X. P. Cai, and H. N. Du, "Approaches for automated detection and classification of masses in mammograms," Pattern Recognition, vol. 39, pp. 646-668, 2006.
  13. R. M. Rangayyan, Biomedical Image Analysis. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2005.
  14. W. M. Morrow, R. B. Paranjape, R. M. Rangayyan, and J. E. L. Desautels, "Region-based contrast enhancement of mammograms," IEEE Trans. Med. Image. , vol. 11, pp. 392-406, 1992.
  15. R. M. Rangayyan, L. Shen, Y. Shen, J. E. L. Desautels, H. Bryant, T. J. Terry, N. Horeczko, and M. S. Rose, "Improvement of sensitivity of breast cancer diagnosis with adaptive neighborhood contrast enhancement of mammograms," Information Technology in Biomedicine, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 1, pp. 161-170, 1997.
  16. D. C. Chang and W. R. Wu, "Image contrast enhancement based on a histogram transformation of local standard deviation," IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. , vol. 17, pp. 518 531, 1998.
  17. H. D. Cheng, X. Cai, X. Chen, L. Hu, and X. Lou, "Computer-aided detection and classification of microcalcifications in mammograms: a survey," Pattern Recognition, vol. 36, pp. 2967-2991, 2003.
  18. H. D. Cheng, X. J. Shi, R. Min, L. M. Hu, X. P. Cai, and H. N. Du, "Approaches for automated detection and classification of masses in mammograms," Pattern Recognition, vol. 39, pp. 646-668, 2006.
  19. H. K. Kang, Y. M. Ro, and S. M. Kim, "A Microcalcification Detection Using Adaptive Contrast Enhancement on Wavelet Transform and Neural Network," IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, pp. 1280-1287, 2006.
  20. H. -K. Kang, N. N. Thanh, S. -M. Kim, and Y. M. Ro, "Robust Contrast Enhancement for Microcalcification in Mammography," in Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2004, 2004, pp. 602-610.
  21. H. -K. Kang, S. -M. Kim, N. N. Thanh, Y. M. Ro, and W. H. Kim, "Adaptive Microcalcification Detection in Computer Aided Diagnosis," in Computational Science ICCS 2004, 2004, pp. 1110-1117.
  22. H. Li, K. J. Liu, S. C. B. Lo, O. T. Inc, and M. D. Jessup, "Fractal modeling and segmentation for the enhancement of microcalcifications in digital mammograms," IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. , vol. 16, pp. 785-798, 1997.
  23. P. Sakellaropoulos, L. Costaridou, and G. Panayiotakis, "A wavelet-based spatially adaptive method for mammographic contrast enhancement," Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 48, pp. 787-803, 2003.
  24. V. E. Pera, E. L. Heffer, H. Siebold, O. Schütz, S. Heywang-K? brunner, L. G?tz, A. Heinig, and S. Fantini, "Spatial second-derivative image processing: an application to optical mammography to enhance the detection of breast tumors," Journal of Biomedical Optics, vol. 8, p. 517,2003.
  25. J. K. Romberg, M. B. Wakin, and R. G. Baraniuk, "Multiscale geometric image processing," in Proceedings of the SPIE: Visual Communications and Image Processing 2003, 2003, pp. 1265-1272.
  26. J. Li-Cheng and T. Shan, "Development and prospect of image multiscale geometric analysis," Acta Electronica Sinica, vol. 31, pp. 1975-1981, 2003.
  27. M. N. Do and M. Vetterli, "The finite Ridgelet transform for image representation," IEEE Trans. Image Process, vol. 12, pp. 16-28, 2003.
  28. J. L. Starck, E. J. Candes, and D. L. Donoho, "The Curvelet transform for image denoising," IEEE Trans. Image Process, vol. 11, pp. 670-684, 2002.
  29. Giovanni Luca Masala, "Computer Aided Detection on Mammography", World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, Vol. 15, Pp. 1-6, 2006.
  30. M. N. Do and M. Vetterli, "The contourlet transform: an efficient directional multiresolution image representation," IEEE Trans. Image Process, vol. 14, pp. 2091-2106, 2005.
  31. Starck , Murtagh ,E. J Candes ,D. L. Donoho, "Gray and Color Image Contrast Enhancement by the Curvelet Transform," IEEE Transactions on Image Processing . vol. , 12, pp. 706- 716, June 2003.
  32. R. R. Coifman and D. L. Donoho, Translation invariant de-noising: Wavelets and statistics. Newyork: Springer Verlag, 1995.
  33. A. L. Da Cunha, J. Zhou, and M. N. Do, "The Nonsubsampled Contourlet Transform: Theory, Design, and Applications," IEEE Trans. Image Process, vol. 15, pp. 3089-3101, 2006.
  34. Zimmerman, J. B. , Pizer, S. M. , "An evaluation of the effectiveness of adaptive histogram equalization for contrast enhancement", IEEE Trans Med. Imaging, Vol. 7, No. 4, Pp. 304–312, 1988.
  35. http://archive. ics. uci. edu/ml/datasets/Breast+Cancer+Wisconsin+%28Diagnostic%29
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Mammogram Images Wavelet Transform Curvelet Transform Contourlet Transform Non Subsampled Transform and Image Enhancement