CFP last date
20 January 2025
Reseach Article

Article:Test Case Generation from Behavioral UML Models

by Santosh Kumar Swain, Durga Prasad Mohapatra
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 6 - Number 8
Year of Publication: 2010
Authors: Santosh Kumar Swain, Durga Prasad Mohapatra
10.5120/1098-1436

Santosh Kumar Swain, Durga Prasad Mohapatra . Article:Test Case Generation from Behavioral UML Models. International Journal of Computer Applications. 6, 8 ( September 2010), 5-11. DOI=10.5120/1098-1436

@article{ 10.5120/1098-1436,
author = { Santosh Kumar Swain, Durga Prasad Mohapatra },
title = { Article:Test Case Generation from Behavioral UML Models },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { September 2010 },
volume = { 6 },
number = { 8 },
month = { September },
year = { 2010 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 5-11 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume6/number8/1098-1436/ },
doi = { 10.5120/1098-1436 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T19:54:50.622909+05:30
%A Santosh Kumar Swain
%A Durga Prasad Mohapatra
%T Article:Test Case Generation from Behavioral UML Models
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 6
%N 8
%P 5-11
%D 2010
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

We propose an integrated approach to generate test cases from UML sequence and activity diagrams. We first transform these UML diagrams into a graph. Then, we propose an algorithm to generate test scenarios from the constructed graph. Next, the necessary information for test case generation, such as method-activity sequence, associated objects, and constraint conditions are extracted from test scenario. Our approach reduces the number of test cases and still achieves adequate test coverage. We achieve message-activity path coverage and category partitioning method for each predicate conditions found in the specific path of the design model.

References
  1. R.V.Binder, Testing object-oriented software: a survey. Software Testing Verification and Reliability, 6(3/4): 125-252, 1996.
  2. R. Mall. Fundamentals of Software Engineering. Prentice Hall, 2nd edition, 2003.
  3. Bertolino, F. Basanieri, A practical approach to UML-based derivation of integration tests, in: Proceedings of the Fourth International Software Quality Week Europe and International Internet Quality Week Europe (QWE), Brussels, Belgium, 2000.
  4. S. Ghose, R. France, C. Braganza, N. Kawane, A. Andrews, O. Pilskalns: “Test adequacy assessment for UML design model testing” In: Proceeding of the International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering, Denver, CO , pp. 332-343, 2003.
  5. N. Kawanw: “Fault Detection Effectiveness of UML Design Model Test Adequacy Criteria “. ISSRE (2003).
  6. A. Abdurazik, J. Offutt: Using UML collaboration diagrams for static checking and test generation. In: 3rd International Conference on the UML. 383-395, 2000.
  7. P. Samuel and R. Mall: “Boundary Value Testing based on UML Models”. In: Proceedings of the 14th Asian Test Symposium (ATS ’05), 2005.
  8. J. Offutt, A. Abdurazik: “Generating tests from UML specifications”, In Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on the UML, pp. 416-429,
  9. Object Management Group: The Unified Modeling Language UML 1.5 Technical Report formal/03-03-01, The Object Management Group (OMG) , 2003.
  10. T. Dinh Trong: “A Systematic Procedure for Testing UML Designs”. ISSRE(2003).
  11. Booch, J. Rumbaugh and I. Jacobson: “Unified Modeling Language User Guide”. Addition-Wesley, 1999.
  12. W.Linzhang,Y.Jiesong et al.: “Generating Test Cases from UML Activity Diagram based on Gray-Box Method”. In Proceedings of the 11th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC04), pages 284-291. IEEE,2004.
  13. T. Dinh Trong: “A Systematic Approach to Testing Design Models” In Doctoral Symposium, 7th International Conference on the Unified Modeling Language, Lisbon, Portugal, 10-15, October 2004.
  14. O. Pilskalns, A. Andrews, S. Ghose, Robert France: “Rigorous testing by merging structural and behavioral uml representations. “ In: Proceeding of the 6th International Conference on the Unified Modeling Language, San Francisco, CA , pp. 234-248, 2003.
  15. Basanieri, A. Bertolino, E. Marchetti, The cow suit approach to planning and deriving test suites in UMLprojectsProceedings of the Fifth International Conference on the UML, LNCS, 2460, Springer-Verlag GmbH, Dresden, Germany, pp. 383–397, 2000.
  16. Fraikin, T. Leonhardt, SEDITEC-testing based on sequence diagrams, in: Proceedings 17th IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 261–266, 2000.
  17. S. K. Swain. UML-based Testing of Software System, Technical Report, KIIT, 2005.
  18. Andrew, R. France, S. Ghose, G. Craig: “Test Adequacy Criteria for UML Design Models”. Journal of Software Testing, Verification and Reliability 13 : 95-127, 2003
  19. Cavarra, C. Crichton and j. Davies: “A method for the automatic generation of test suites from object models. Information and Software Technology, 46(5): 309-314, 2004.
  20. Hartmann, C. Imoberdorf, M. Meisinger, UML-based integration testing, in: ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, Proceedings of International Symposium on Software testing and analysis, 2000.
  21. T. Dinh Trong “Rules for Generating Code From UML Collaboration diagram and Activity Diagrams” Master’s Thesis, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado,2003.
  22. A. Abdurazik, J. Offutt, A. Baldini: “A Controlled Experimental Evaluation of Test Cases Generated from UML Diagrams”, Technical report, George Mason University, Department of Information and Software Engineering, May, 2004.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Software Testing UML Models Sequence diagram Activity diagram Model Flow Graph Test Sequence