We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 December 2024
Call for Paper
January Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming January edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 December 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Improved Shuffled Frog Leaping Algorithm with Self-Adaptive Shuffling for Fuzzy Logic PD+G Controller Optimization in Robotic Manipulators

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Integrating TOPSIS and AHP into GORE Decision Support System

by Vinay S, Shridhar Aithal, Sudhakara G
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 56 - Number 17
Year of Publication: 2012
Authors: Vinay S, Shridhar Aithal, Sudhakara G
10.5120/8987-3216

Vinay S, Shridhar Aithal, Sudhakara G . Integrating TOPSIS and AHP into GORE Decision Support System. International Journal of Computer Applications. 56, 17 ( October 2012), 46-53. DOI=10.5120/8987-3216

@article{ 10.5120/8987-3216,
author = { Vinay S, Shridhar Aithal, Sudhakara G },
title = { Integrating TOPSIS and AHP into GORE Decision Support System },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { October 2012 },
volume = { 56 },
number = { 17 },
month = { October },
year = { 2012 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 46-53 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume56/number17/8987-3216/ },
doi = { 10.5120/8987-3216 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:59:08.179098+05:30
%A Vinay S
%A Shridhar Aithal
%A Sudhakara G
%T Integrating TOPSIS and AHP into GORE Decision Support System
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 56
%N 17
%P 46-53
%D 2012
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Decision making in Software Engineering plays an important role at different stages of Software development life cycle. In this paper we consider the case study of selecting one among the three Content Management Systems (CMS) for a university website. We use our Goal-Oriented Requirements Engineering (GORE) method to identify the soft goals which play a vital role in deciding which CMS is chosen. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is then used to prioritize the soft goals. The output of AHP is used as input to Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) which produces a metric which decides the best alternative among the candidates.

References
  1. Joerg Doerr, Daniel Kerkow, Tom Koenig, Thomas Olsson, Takeshi Suzuki, "Non-Functional Requirements in Industry – Three Case Studies Adopting an Experience-based NFR Method", in Proceedings of the 2005 13th IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering, 1995
  2. Mylopoulos, J. , Chung, L. , Nixon B. " Representing and Using Nonfunctional Requirements: A Process-Oriented Approach", IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 18(6), pp 483–497, 1992
  3. Van Lamsweerde A, "Goal-Oriented Requirements Engineering: A Guided Tour" in Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, August 2001, IEEE Computer Society, Washington
  4. Gunther Ruhe, "Software Engineering Decision Support and Empirical Investigations – A Proposed Marriage," in Workshop on Empirical Studies in Software Engineering (WSESE), 2003.
  5. Hannes Omasreiter, "Balanced Decision Making in Software Engineering – General Thoughts and a Concrete Example from Industry," in First International Workshop on the Economics of Software and Computation (ESC), 2007
  6. Steve Easterbrook, Janice Singer, Margaret-Anne Storey, Daniela Damian, "Selecting Empirical Methods for Software Engineering Research," in Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering, Section III, 285-311, 2008
  7. Jo E. Hannay, Dag I. K. Sjøberg, Tore Dyba, "A Systematic Review of Theory Use in Software Engineering Experiments," IEEE transactions on Software Engineering, VOL. 33, NO. 2, Feb 2007
  8. Jenny Price, Jacob Cybulski, "The Importance of IS Stakeholder Perspectives and Perceptions to Requirements Negotiation," in AWR, Adelaide, Australia, 2006
  9. Ana Ivanovi? and Pierre America, "Information Needed for Architecture Decision Making," in Proceedings of the ICSE Workshop on Product Line Approaches in Software Engineering, 2010
  10. Vidya Lakshminarayanan, WenQian Liu, Charles L Chen, Steve Easterbrook, Dewayne E Perry, "Software Architects in Practice: Handling Requirements," in Proceedings of the conference of the Center for Advanced Studies on Collaborative research (CASCON), 2006
  11. Mohammad Shabbir Hasan, Abdullah Al Mahmood, Md. Jahangir Alam, Sk. Md. Nahid Hasan, Farin Rahman, "An Evaluation of Software Requirement Prioritization Techniques," International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security (IJCSIS), Vol. 8, No. 9, December 2010
  12. Thomas L. Saaty, "Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process," Int. J. Services Sciences, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2008
  13. Haag, S. E. , and Hogan P, "Research issues in software quality function deployment: A new beginning for software engineering methodologies," in Proceedings of Decision Sciences Institute '92 Nov. 23–25, San Francisco, California, DSI, Atlanta, Ga. , pp. 926–928, 1992.
  14. J. Castro, M. Kolp, J. Mylopoulos. Towards Requirements-Driven Information Systems Engineering: The Tropos Project. Information Systems, 27(6), September 2002.
  15. 15. H Kaiya et al, "Identifying Stakeholders and Their Preferences about NFR by Comparing Use Case Diagrams of Several Existing Systems", 12th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE'04)
  16. Vinay S, Shridhar Aithal and Sudhakar Adiga, A Goal-Oriented Requirements Engineering Method for Analysing Conflicts, ICCANA, Nitte, Jan 2011
  17. Akao, Yoji. "Development History of Quality Function Deployment". The Customer Driven Approach to Quality Planning and Deployment. Minato, Tokyo 107 Japan: Asian Productivity Organization. pp. 339.
  18. G Herzwurm et al, "QFD for customer focused Requirements Engineering," in 11th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, 2003
  19. Andreas Hierholzer, Georg Herzwurm, Harald Schlang, "Applying QFD for Software Process Improvement at SAP AG, Walldorf, Germany," in Proceedings of the third workshop on Software quality, ACM, 2003
  20. De Felice, A. Petrillo, "A multiple choice decision analysis: an integrated QFD – AHP Model for the Assessment of Customer Needs," International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology, Vol. 2, No. 9, pp. 25-38, 2010
  21. Chen, S. J. , Hwang, C. L. , 1992. Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Springer- Verlag, Berlin.
  22. Hwang, C. L. , Yoon, K. , 1981. Multiple Attribute Decision Making. In: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems 186. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
  23. Abdallah Sami Abbas Shehata Mohamed, Ph. D thesis on Decision Support for Selecting COTS Software Products Based on Comprehensive Mismatch Handling.
  24. Kaiya. H, Nagano Horai H, Saeki M, AGORA: attributed goal-oriented requirements analysis method, International Conference on Requirements Engineering, 2002 Proceedings
  25. Vinay S, Shridhar Aithal, Sudhakara Adiga, A Quantitative Approach Using Goal-Oriented Requirements Engineering Methodology and Analytic Hierarchy Process in Selecting the Best Alternative, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing Volume 174, 2012, pp 441-454
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

GoalOriented Requirements Engineering Analytic Hierarchy Process Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution Soft goals

Powered by PhDFocusTM