We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 November 2024
Call for Paper
December Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming December edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 November 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
An Efficient Restoration Method for the Faint Dot Matrix Images

Ao Zhu Peng Cao
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Role of Decision Making Models in District Scenario Planning

by Satyajit Rath, Sateesh K. Pradhan, V. N. Shukla
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 56 - Number 17
Year of Publication: 2012
Authors: Satyajit Rath, Sateesh K. Pradhan, V. N. Shukla
10.5120/8982-2895

Satyajit Rath, Sateesh K. Pradhan, V. N. Shukla . Role of Decision Making Models in District Scenario Planning. International Journal of Computer Applications. 56, 17 ( October 2012), 12-17. DOI=10.5120/8982-2895

@article{ 10.5120/8982-2895,
author = { Satyajit Rath, Sateesh K. Pradhan, V. N. Shukla },
title = { Role of Decision Making Models in District Scenario Planning },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { October 2012 },
volume = { 56 },
number = { 17 },
month = { October },
year = { 2012 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 12-17 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume56/number17/8982-2895/ },
doi = { 10.5120/8982-2895 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:59:05.565549+05:30
%A Satyajit Rath
%A Sateesh K. Pradhan
%A V. N. Shukla
%T Role of Decision Making Models in District Scenario Planning
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 56
%N 17
%P 12-17
%D 2012
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

While a country is surging ahead from a developing country to the status of a developed nation, the term "Development" has a connotation, both in terms of macro-level or micro-level development. When referred at the country level it becomes macro-level development, while at districts, it becomes micro-level development. At the sub-state level, "District" is the basic unit for all administrative purpose and also consistent with the decentralized planning process prevailing at the grass-root. However, the planning and development at district level can be further subdivided into urban planning and rural planning. Urban planning basically focuses on urban areas for its planned development with proper land use. These activities are generally taken cared by respective Urban Development Authorities. Planning at rural level can further be zeroed down to village / habitation. As part of the Planning objectives, Rural Planning needs to reflect growth and social justice, as growth in the rural sector has been identified as the key to social and economic development. Development involves making decisions and informed choices amongst alternative possible development paths. Therefore, it is important that these decisions are made using the best information, methods and tools available in an effective manner. The information to be considered for planning may be of sectoral or non-sectoral in nature. Today's scenario is focused on planning and each department plans for assigned limited sectoral development. However development of each sector is dependent on each other. For this purpose planners take decisions on the questions like Where, Why, How etc. When we talk about decisions, there are various decision models available to choose from depending upon the requirement. This paper deliberates the aspects of sectoral planning and the role of decision models in this planning process and its effectiveness with respect to planning.

References
  1. Animesh Biswas, Bijay Baran Pal, "Application of fuzzy goal programming technique to land use planning in agricultural system" Elsevier, Omega 33 (2005) 391 – 398
  2. Carlos Parra-Lópeza, Javier Calatrava-Requenaa, Tomás de-Haro-Giménezb, A systemic comparative assessment of the multifunctional performance of alternative olive systems in Spain within an AHP-extended framework, Ecological Economics 64(2008) 820 – 834.
  3. Chao-Shi Chen, Ya-Ching Liu, A methodology for evaluation and classification of rock mass quality on tunnel engineering, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 22 (2007) 377–387.
  4. Dinesh K. Sharma a,*, Debasis Ghosh b, Julius A. Alade, "A fuzzy goal programming approach for regional rural development planning" Elsevier, Applied Mathematics and Computation 176 (2006) 141–149
  5. Ezatollah Karami, Appropriateness of farmers_ adoption of irrigation methods: The application of the AHP model, Agricultural Systems 87 (2006) 101–119
  6. Fabiane de Oliveira, Neida Maria Patias Volpi,Carlos Roberto Sanquetta, "Goal programming in a planning problem", Elsevier, Applied Mathematics and Computation 140 (2003) 165–178
  7. FariborzY. Partovi,An analytic model for locating facilities strategically, Omega, The Int. Journal Of Management Science, 34 (2006) 41 – 55
  8. Gregory A. Kiker, Todd S. Bridges, Arun Varghese, Thomas P. Seager, and Igor Linkovjj, "Application of Multicriteria Decision Analysis in Environmental Decision Making", Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management — Volume 1, Number 2 — pp. 95–108
  9. Guoqiang Sun, Tetsuo Ui, Hidetoshi Nakayasu, "Development of a practical goal programming system for solving semi-large size multi-criterion planning problems", Elsevier, Int. J. Production Economics 39 (1995) 227-242
  10. Henny van de Water_, Heleen P. van Peet, A decision support model based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process for the Make or Buy decision in manufacturing, Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management 12 (2006) 258–271.
  11. Heshamk. Alfares and Saliho. Duffuaa, Assigning CardinalWeights inMulti-Criteria Decision Making Based on Ordinal Ranking, Journal Of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 2008
  12. John T. Blake, Michael W. Carter, "A goal programming approach to strategic resource allocation in acute care hospitals" ELSEVIER, European Journal of Operational Research 140 (2002) 541–561
  13. Kaili Dou, Qingming Zhan, Shiguo Li, "Selection of Residential Land based on Integration of MCDA and Gravity Model", 2009 IEEE
  14. Kangmao Wang, Clement K. Wang, and Chun Hu, Analytic Hierarchy Process With Fuzzy Scoring in Evaluating Multidisciplinary R&D Projects in China, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. 52, no. 1, february 2005
  15. Kemal Sar?ca, Ilhan Or, "Efficiency assessment of Turkish power plants using data envelopment analysis", Elsevier, Energy 32 (2007) 1484–1499
  16. Kwang Eui Yooa, Youn Chul Choib, Analytic hierarchy process approach for identifying relative importance of factors to improve passenger security checks at airports, Journal of Air Transport Management 12 (2006) 135–142.
  17. Luis Rodriguez-Repisoa, Rossitza Setchib,_, Jose L. Salmeronc, Modelling IT projects success: Emerging methodologies reviewed, Technovation 27 (2007) 582–594
  18. M. Bertolini, M. Braglia, G. Carmignani b, Application of the AHP methodology in making a proposal for a public work contract, International Journal of Project Management 24 (2006) 422–430.
  19. M. M. Kablan, Decision support for energy conservation promotion: an analytic hierarchy process approach, Energy Policy 32 (2004) 1151–1158
  20. Marcelo Zawadzki and Danielle Araujo, "Applying the Scenario Planning Approach to support Multicriterial Strategic Assessment" 2011 IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support (CogSIMA), Miami Beach, FL
  21. Masood A. Badri, Combining the analytic hierarchy process and goal programming for global facility location-allocation problem, Int. J. Production Economics 62 (1999) 237}248
  22. Oded Berman, Fatemeh "Mariam" Zahedi, and Kim R. Pemble, A Decision Model and Support System for the Optimal Design of Health Information Networks, IEEE Transactions On Systems, Man, And Cybernetics—Part C: Applications And Reviews, Vol. 31, No. 2, May 2001
  23. Prasanna Sirdhar, Asad M. Madni, Mo Jamshidi, "MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING AND BEHAVIOR ASSIGNMENT IN SENSOR NETWORKS" 2007 1st Annual IEEE Systems Conference, Waikiki Beach, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA April 9-12, 2007
  24. R. Chedid, Member IEEE & H. Akiki, Saifur Rahman, Senior Member IEEE, A Decision Support Technique For The Design Of Hybrid Solar-Wind Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, Vol. 13, No. 1, March 1998
  25. Rafael Caballero, Teodoro Galache, Trinidad Go´mez, Julian Molina, Angel Torrico, "Budgetary allocations and efficiency in the human resources policy of a university following multiple criteria", Elsevier, Economics of Education Review 23 (2004) 67–74
  26. Rhonda Aull-Hyde, Sevgi Erdogan b, Joshua M. Duke, An experiment on the consistency of aggregated comparison matrices in AHP, European Journal of Operational Research 171 (2006) 290–295
  27. Sani Yahaya, Noordin Ahmad, Ranya Fadlalla Abdalla, "Multicriteria Analysis for Flood Vulnerable Areas in Hadejia-Jama'are River Basin, Nigeria", European Journal of Scientific Research, ISSN 1450-216X Vol. 42 No. 1 (2010), pp. 71-83
  28. Sebnemburnaz and Y. Ilker Topcu, A Multiple-Criteria Decision-making Approach for the Evaluation of Retail Location, Journal Of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 67–76, 2006
  29. T. Go´mez, M. Herna´ndez, M. A. Leo´n, R. Caballero, "A forest planning problem solved via a linear fractional goal programming model" Elsevier, Forest Ecology and Management 227 (2006) 79–88
  30. Theresa Mau-Crimminsa, J. E. de Steiguera, Donald Dennisb, AHP as a means for improving public participation: a pre–post experiment with university students, Forest Policy and Economics 7 (2005) 501– 514.
  31. Tijen Ertay, Da Ruan, "Data envelopment analysis based decision model for optimal operator allocation in CMS" European Journal of Operational Research 164 (2005) 800–810
  32. Umm-e-Habiba and Sohail Asghar, A Survey on Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approaches, 2009 International Conference on Emerging Technologies, 2009 IEEE
  33. Xiong Yinga,b, Zeng Guang-Minga, Chen Gui-Qiua, Tang Lina, Wang Ke-Linc, Huang Dao-Youc, Combining AHP with GIS in synthetic evaluation of eco-environment quality—A case study of Hunan Province, China, ecological modelling 209 ( 2007 ) 97–109
  34. Younghwa Lee, Kenneth A. Kozar, Investigating the Effect of Website Quality on e-Business Success: An analytic Hierarchy Process Approach, Decision Support Systems 42 (2006) 1383–1401
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

District Planning Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) Analytic Hierarchy Process Primary Education Primary Health Centre

Powered by PhDFocusTM