We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 November 2024
Call for Paper
December Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming December edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 November 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
Reseach Article

Behavioral Identification of Budding Professionals through "Neo Personality Inventory Traits"

by V. P. Nanthini, V. Rhymend Uthariaraj
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 56 - Number 12
Year of Publication: 2012
Authors: V. P. Nanthini, V. Rhymend Uthariaraj
10.5120/8946-3112

V. P. Nanthini, V. Rhymend Uthariaraj . Behavioral Identification of Budding Professionals through "Neo Personality Inventory Traits". International Journal of Computer Applications. 56, 12 ( October 2012), 41-46. DOI=10.5120/8946-3112

@article{ 10.5120/8946-3112,
author = { V. P. Nanthini, V. Rhymend Uthariaraj },
title = { Behavioral Identification of Budding Professionals through "Neo Personality Inventory Traits" },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { October 2012 },
volume = { 56 },
number = { 12 },
month = { October },
year = { 2012 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 41-46 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume56/number12/8946-3112/ },
doi = { 10.5120/8946-3112 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:58:40.911987+05:30
%A V. P. Nanthini
%A V. Rhymend Uthariaraj
%T Behavioral Identification of Budding Professionals through "Neo Personality Inventory Traits"
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 56
%N 12
%P 41-46
%D 2012
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Twenty first century is considered as the knowledge era in which intellectual capabilities coupled with individual expertise contributed much for the development of the society and its supporting systems. The usefulness of personality traits in the explanation and prediction of students is critically evaluated, and both contemporary theory, existing empirical findings are reviewed, emphasizing the need for conceptual clarity and methodological reform. This research work focuses on the possibility of building a decision for the benefit of students based on their personality, interest, family background, vision, past accomplishments and so on. We employed the neo-personality psychometric inventory to collect the primary data. Personality can greatly assist in the prediction of future performance from data collected from first semester B. E. / B. Tech Students. The FFPI model has revealed that it is a robust model that can describe an individual's personality. The objective is to analyze the basic personality traits, to find out the performance capabilities and to evaluate the effectiveness of an individual. It selects sample of respondents and the study has been carried out on the areas that identify the need for the NEO Personality Inventory and evaluation reports have been prepared based on the analysis. This study would help the university to understand the attitude and performance of both the boy and girl students and to take necessary measures to overcome the discrepancies of negative aspects of buddy professionals in order to be successful folks in future. Findings are discussed in terms of analyzing FFPI model and areas for further research, with emphasis on the importance of personality in relation to behavior prediction. Girls are highly neurotic, conscientious, boys are highly agreeable and extrovert and both are average in openness to experience. Recommendations for future research are outlined, and this critique is complemented by a detailed case study of a practical research design drawn from an ongoing project. Taken together this provides a powerful illustration of how abstract principles with experimental approach can be used and an underlying message emanating from this evolving body of knowledge can be used to enrich educational activities.

References
  1. Yuri Jang, James A. Mortimer, William E. Haley, Amy Borenstein Graves. 2002. The Role of Neuroticism in the Association Between Performance-Based and Self-Reported Reported Measures of Mobility. J. Aging and Health, 14(4), (2002), 495-508.
  2. Kline, P. , and Lapham, S. L. 1992. Personality and faculty in British universities. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 855–857.
  3. Costa, P. T. , Jr. , and McCrae, R. R. 1992. NEO PI_R: Professional manual odessa. Florida: Psychological Assessment Inc.
  4. Wilson G. D. . , and Jackson, C. 1994. The personality of physicists. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 187–189.
  5. Matthews, G. , and Oddy, K. 1993. Recovery of major personality dimensions from trait adjective data. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 419–431.
  6. Granleese, J. , and Barrett, T. F. 1990. The social and personality characteristics of the Irish accountant. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11, 957–964.
  7. Carson, R. C. , Butcher, J. N and Mineka, S. 1998. Abnormal psychology and modern life (10th ed. ). New York: Addison-Wesley.
  8. Costa, P. T. , Jr. , Terracciano, A and McCrae, R. R. 2001. Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: robust and surprising Findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 322–331.
  9. Harris. J. A. 1993. Personalities of students in three faculties: perception and accuracy. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 351–352.
  10. Penley Julie A and Tomaka Joe. 2002. Associations among the Big five, emotional responses, and coping with acute stress. Journal of Personality and individual differences, 32, 1215-1228.
  11. Erez Amir and Judge Timothy A. 2001. Relationship of core self-evaluations to goal setting, motivation, and performance. Journal of applied psychology, 86, 1270-1279.
  12. Neyer Franz J. and Asendorpf Jens B. 2001. Personality relationship transaction in young adulthood , Journal of personality and social psychology, 81, 1190-1204.
  13. Marie S. Hammond, The use of the Five- Factor Model of Personality as a Therapeutic Tool in Career Counseling. Journal of Career Development, 27(3), 153-165.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

NEO Personality Inventory Traits – FFPI - Five Factor Personality Inventory - Extraversion Agreeableness Conscientiousness Neuroticism and Openness to Experience