We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

Performance Evaluation of Mobile Ad Hoc Networks with Reactive and Proactive Routing Protocols and Mobility Models

by Sunil Kumar Kaushik, Kavita Chahal, Sukhbir Singh, Sandeep Dhariwal
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 54 - Number 17
Year of Publication: 2012
Authors: Sunil Kumar Kaushik, Kavita Chahal, Sukhbir Singh, Sandeep Dhariwal
10.5120/8660-2522

Sunil Kumar Kaushik, Kavita Chahal, Sukhbir Singh, Sandeep Dhariwal . Performance Evaluation of Mobile Ad Hoc Networks with Reactive and Proactive Routing Protocols and Mobility Models. International Journal of Computer Applications. 54, 17 ( September 2012), 28-35. DOI=10.5120/8660-2522

@article{ 10.5120/8660-2522,
author = { Sunil Kumar Kaushik, Kavita Chahal, Sukhbir Singh, Sandeep Dhariwal },
title = { Performance Evaluation of Mobile Ad Hoc Networks with Reactive and Proactive Routing Protocols and Mobility Models },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { September 2012 },
volume = { 54 },
number = { 17 },
month = { September },
year = { 2012 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 28-35 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume54/number17/8660-2522/ },
doi = { 10.5120/8660-2522 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:55:57.773525+05:30
%A Sunil Kumar Kaushik
%A Kavita Chahal
%A Sukhbir Singh
%A Sandeep Dhariwal
%T Performance Evaluation of Mobile Ad Hoc Networks with Reactive and Proactive Routing Protocols and Mobility Models
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 54
%N 17
%P 28-35
%D 2012
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Mobile Ad hoc Network is a collection of wireless mobile nodes dynamically forming a temporary network without the aid of any established infrastructure or centralized administration. Routing protocols in mobile ad hoc network helps node to send and receive packets. In this paper we are doing study of AODV, DSR (Reactive), and OLSR, DSDV, TORA (Proactive) protocols based on various mobility models [3] such as RPGM, CMM and RWP . In this paper we evaluate performance of five types of routing protocols (AODV, DSR, OLSR, DSDV and TORA) based on packet delivery ratio, average end to end delay, routing overhead and throughput. In this paper we will analyze and compare the performance of reactive and proactive routing protocols under different mobility models using NS-2 simulator in the area of 700 x 700 m2.

References
  1. E. M. Royer, C. -K. Toh, A review of current routing protocols for ad hoc mobile wireless networks, IEEE Personal Communications 6 (2) (1999) 46–55.
  2. M. Abolhasan, T. Wysocki, "A review of routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks", Ad Hoc Networks, Vol. 2, Issue 1, pp 1-22, 1 January 2004.
  3. Santosh Kumar ,S C Sharma and Bhupendra Suman ," Classification and Evaluation of Mobility Metrics for Mobility Model Movement Patterns in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks ",International journal on applications of graph theory in wireless ad hoc networks and sensor networks (GRAPH-HOC) Vol. 3, No. 3, September 2011.
  4. R. Misra, C. R. Mandal, "Performance comparison of AODV/DSR on-demand routing protocols for ad hoc networks in constrained situation", IEEE Int. Conf. on Personal Wireless Communications, pp. 86- 89, Jan. 2005.
  5. G. Jayakumar, G. Ganapathy, "Performance Comparison of Mobile Ad-hoc Network Routing Protocol", Int. J. of Comp. Science and Network Security, Vol. 7, No. 11, Nov. 2007.
  6. H. Jiang and J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves. Performance comparison of three routing protocols for ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of IEEE ICCCN 2001, pages 547-554, 2001.
  7. P. Johansson, T. Larsson, N. Hedman, B. Mielczarek, and M. Degermark, "Scenario-Based Performance Analysis of Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks", 5th ACM/IEEE Int. Conf. on Mobile Computing and networking, pp. 195-206. 1999.
  8. J. Broch, D. A. Maltz, D. B. Johnson, Y. Hu, J. Jetcheva, "A Performance Comparison of Multi-Hop Wireless Ad Hoc Network Routing Protocols", Proc. of the 4th ACM/IEEE Int. conf. on Mobile computing and networking, pp. 85-97. 1998.
  9. Li Layuan, Li Chunlin, Yaun Peiyan, "Performance evaluation and simulations of routing protocols in ad hoc networks", Computer Communications, Vol. 30, pp 1890–1898. 2007.
  10. Azzedine Boukerche, "Performance Evaluation of Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Wireless Networks", Journal of Mobile Networks and Application, Vol. 9, No 4. pp. 333-342, 2004.
  11. Parma Nand , S. C. Sharma, "Comparative Study and Performance Analysis of FSR,ZRP and AODV Routing Protocols for MANET", IJCA Proceedings on International Conference and workshop on Emerging Trends in Technology (ICWET) (2):14-19, 2011.
  12. Ejiro. E. Igbesoko, Thaddeus Onyinye Eze, Mona Ghassemian"Performance Analysis of MANET Routing Protocols over Different Mobility Models", In proceedings of London Communications Symposium (LCS), University College London, Sept. 2010. http://www. ee. ucl. ac. uk/lcs/previous/. . . /lens2010_submission_18. pdf
  13. R. Manoharan and E. Ilavarasan,"Impact of Mobility On The Performance of Multicast Routing Protocols In MANET", International Journal Of Wireless and Mobile Networks (IJWMN). Vol 2, No. 2, May 2010.
  14. Santosh Kumar , S C sharma, Bhupendra Suman,"Simulation Based Performance Analysis of routing {rptpcp;s Isomg Ramdp, Waypoint Mobility Model in Mobile Ad Hoc Network", Global Journals inc. (USA),Vol. 11,Issue 1. Version 1. 0 Feb. 2011, ISSN:0975-4172
  15. Vivek Thapar, Bindiya Jain, Varsha Sahni, "Performance Analysis Of Ad hoc Routing Protocols Using Random Waypoint Mobility Model In Wireless Sensor", International Journal On computer Science and Engineering (IJCSE),Vol. 3No. 8 August 2011 ISSN: 0975-3397.
  16. F. Bai, N. Sadagopan, and A. Helmy, Important: a framework to systematically analyze the impact of mobility on performance of routing protocols for ad hoc networks, in Proceedings of IEEE Information Communications Conference (INFOCOM 2003), San Francisco, Apr. 2003.
  17. Fahim Maan Nauman Mazhar "MANET Routing Protocols vs. Mobility Models: A Performance Evaluation", in Proceedings of IEEE Conference ICUFN 2011, pp. 179-184.
  18. Tanu Preet Singh, Dr. R K Singh and Jayant Vats. Article: Routing Protocols in Ad Hoc Networks: A Review. International Journal of Computer Applications 25(4):30-35, July 2011.
  19. F. Bai and A. Helmy, "Wireless ad hoc and sensor networks", Chapter 1: "A survey of mobility models", 2004, http://nile. usc. edu/ helmy/important/Modified-Chapter1-5-30-04. pdf.
  20. T. Camp, J. Boleng, and V. Davies, A Survey of Mobility Models for Ad Hoc Network Research, in Wireless Communication and Mobile Computing (WCMC): Special issue on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking: Research, Trends and Applications, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 483-502, 2002.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

MANET AODV DSR OLSR DSDV TORA RPGM CMM and RWP