We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 November 2024
Reseach Article

Wood Knot Classification using Bagging

by S. Mohan, K. Venkatachalapathy
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 51 - Number 18
Year of Publication: 2012
Authors: S. Mohan, K. Venkatachalapathy
10.5120/8146-1937

S. Mohan, K. Venkatachalapathy . Wood Knot Classification using Bagging. International Journal of Computer Applications. 51, 18 ( August 2012), 50-53. DOI=10.5120/8146-1937

@article{ 10.5120/8146-1937,
author = { S. Mohan, K. Venkatachalapathy },
title = { Wood Knot Classification using Bagging },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { August 2012 },
volume = { 51 },
number = { 18 },
month = { August },
year = { 2012 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 50-53 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume51/number18/8146-1937/ },
doi = { 10.5120/8146-1937 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:51:08.263272+05:30
%A S. Mohan
%A K. Venkatachalapathy
%T Wood Knot Classification using Bagging
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 51
%N 18
%P 50-53
%D 2012
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

The quality of the wood is determined by the number of defects and its distribution. In a piece of timber, the most common type of imperfection is called knot that decreases the strength of the wood. Manual selection and classification process of knots is tedious and time consuming job. An automatic sensing machine is able to inspect wood automatically and correctly identify the defects it possess, and its effect on the quality of the final product. In this paper, it is proposed to detect and classify the knots in timber boards. The image of knots is pre processed using Hilbert transform and Gabor filters. The features obtained from pre processing, is classified using data mining techniques and compared with bagging technique.

References
  1. Brian Jr. Bond. Characterization of Wood Features Using Color, Shape, and Density Parameters. PhD thesis, 1998.
  2. Mario I. Chacon and Graciela Ramirez Alonso. Wood defects classification using a som/ffp approach with minimum dimension feature vector. Volume 3973, pages 1105{1110, May 2006.
  3. Raul Vicen Irene Gu, Henrik Andersson. Wood defect classification based on image analysis and support vector machines. November 2009.
  4. A. G Stove. A doppler-based target classifier using linear discriminants and principal components. October 2004.
  5. D. Pham, Z. Muhamad, M. Mahmuddin, A. Ghanbarzadeh, E. Koc¸, and S. Otri, "Using the bees algorithm to optimise a support vector machine for wood defect classi?cation," in Memorias del Innovative Production Machines and Systems Virtual Conference, 2007.
  6. Estévez, P. A. , C. A. Perez, and E. Goles. 2003, Genetic input selection to a neural classifier for defect classification of radiata pine boards. Forest Prod. J. 53(7/8):87-94.
  7. Zhen Hou, Johne M. Parker "Texture Defect Detection Using Support Vector Machines with Adaptive Gabor Wavelet Features", "IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision", Vol1, pp 275-280, 2005.
  8. Pei, S. -C. ; Jaw, S. -B. ; "Computation of discrete Hilbert transform through fast Hartley transform,"Circuits and Systems, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 36, no. 9, pp. 1251-1252, Sep 1989.
  9. Dengsheng Zhang, Aylwin Wong, Maria Indrawan, Guojun Lu ,"Content-based Image Retrieval Using Gabor Texture Features
  10. C J Setchell, N W Campbell ,"Using Colour Gabor Texture Features For Scene Understanding. " In Proc. 7th Internat Conf. on image processing applications. Vol. 67(5), pp. 372-376.
  11. Leo Breiman (1996). "Bagging predictors". Machine Learning 24 (2): 123-140. doi:10. 1007/BF00058655.
  12. J. R. Quinlan. Bagging, boosting, and C4. 5. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth National Conference on Arti?cial Intelligence, pages 725–730, 1996.
  13. E. Bauer and R. Kohavi. An empirical comparison of voting classi?cation algorithms: Bagging, boosting and variants. Machine Learning, 36(1,2), 1999.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Wood Knots Hilbert Transforms Gabor Filter Naïve Bayes Radial Basis Function