We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 November 2024
Reseach Article

Optimal Score Level Fusion using Modalities Reliability and Separability Measures

by Anzar S.M., Sathidevi P.S.
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 51 - Number 16
Year of Publication: 2012
Authors: Anzar S.M., Sathidevi P.S.
10.5120/8123-1953

Anzar S.M., Sathidevi P.S. . Optimal Score Level Fusion using Modalities Reliability and Separability Measures. International Journal of Computer Applications. 51, 16 ( August 2012), 1-8. DOI=10.5120/8123-1953

@article{ 10.5120/8123-1953,
author = { Anzar S.M., Sathidevi P.S. },
title = { Optimal Score Level Fusion using Modalities Reliability and Separability Measures },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { August 2012 },
volume = { 51 },
number = { 16 },
month = { August },
year = { 2012 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 1-8 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume51/number16/8123-1953/ },
doi = { 10.5120/8123-1953 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:50:32.141579+05:30
%A Anzar S.M.
%A Sathidevi P.S.
%T Optimal Score Level Fusion using Modalities Reliability and Separability Measures
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 51
%N 16
%P 1-8
%D 2012
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

This paper presents two optimal fusion techniques using reliability and separability measures for a multibiometric system, employing fingerprints and voice. In the first method, reliabilities of fingerprint and voice modalities are measured and the integration weights are computed as the ratio of these two reliabilities. The computed reliability ratio is then optimized against the recognition accuracy. The optimizing parameter is estimated in the training/validating phase. Latter is a multi-normalization based fusion scheme, where the separability measures are used as the integration weights to improve the performance of the biometric system. The inter/intra class separability measures and the d-prime separability measures, under various noise conditions are estimated in the training/validation stage. Performance of the proposed methods are compared with that of the baseline techniques using score level fusion. Experimental studies show that, the proposed methods improve global recognition rate and reduce the False Acceptance Rate (FAR) and False Rejection Rate (FRR) over the baseline systems. The advantage of the proposed biometric techniques is that they can be easily integrated into any multibiometric system with score level fusion and find extremely useful in applications especially with less number of available training samples.

References
  1. G. Aggarwal, N. K. Ratha, R. M. Bolle, and R. Chellappa. Multi-biometric cohort analysis for biometric fusion. In Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 2008. ICASSP 2008. IEEE International Conference on, pages 5224– 5227. IEEE, 2008.
  2. Harbi Almahafzah and Maen Zaid Alrwashdeh. Article: A survey of multibiometric systems. International Journal of Computer Applications, 43(15):36–43, April 2012. Published by Foundation of Computer Science, New York, USA.
  3. F. Alsaade, A. Ariyaeeinia, A. Malegaonkar, and S. Pillay. Qualitative fusion of normalised scores in multimodal biometrics. Pattern Recognition Letters, 30(5):564–569, 2009.
  4. S. M. Anzar and P. S. Sathidevi. Optimization of integration weights for a multibiometric system with score level fusion. In Advances in Computing and Inform. Technology, AISC 177, pages 833–842. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelburg, 2012.
  5. M. Bendris, D. Charlet, and G. Chollet. Introduction of quality measures in audio-visual identity verification. In Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 2009. ICASSP 2009. IEEE International Conference on, pages 1913– 1916. IEEE, 2009.
  6. R. Bolle. Guide to biometrics. Springer-Verlag New York Inc, 2004.
  7. L. Feng and L. K. Hansen. A new database for speaker recognition. IMM, Informatik og Matematisk Modelling, DTU, 2005.
  8. A. Jain, K. Nandakumar, and A. Ross. Score normalization in multimodal biometric systems. Pattern recognition, 38(12):2270–2285, 2005.
  9. AK Jain, L. Hong, and Y. Kulkarni. A multimodal biometric system using fingerprint, face and speech. In Proceedings of 2nd Int'l Conference on Audio-and Video-based Biometric Person Authentication, Washington DC, pages 182–187, 1999.
  10. HB Kekre and VA Bharadi. Ageing adaptation for multimodal biometrics using adaptive feature set update algorithm. In Advance Computing Conference, 2009. IACC 2009. IEEE International, pages 535–540. IEEE, 2009.
  11. K. Kryszczuk, J. Richiardi, P. Prodanov, and A. Drygajlo. Reliability-based decision fusion in multimodal biometric verification systems. EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing, 2007(1):74–74, 2007.
  12. J. S. Lee and C. H. Park. Robust audio-visual speech recognition based on late integration. Multimedia, IEEE Transactions on, 10(5):767–779, 2008.
  13. T. W. Lewis and D. M. W. Powers. Sensor fusion weighting measures in audio-visual speech recognition. In Proceedings of the 27th Australasian conference on Computer science-Volume 26, pages 305–314. Australian Computer Society, Inc. , 2004.
  14. D. Maio, D. Maltoni, R. Cappelli, J. L. Wayman, and A. K. Jain. Fvc2002: Second fingerprint verification competition. In Pattern Recognition, 2002. Proceedings. 16th International Conference on, volume 3, pages 811–814. IEEE, 2002.
  15. D. Maltoni, D. Maio, A. K. Jain, and S. Prabhakar. Handbook of fingerprint recognition. Springer-Verlag New York Inc, 2009.
  16. N. Poh and S. Bengio. Improving fusion with marginderived confidence in biometric authentication tasks. In Audio-and Video-Based Biometric Person Authentication, pages 347–356. Springer, 2005.
  17. Rajavel R. and Sathidevi P. S. A new GA optimised Reliability Ratio based integration weight estimation scheme for decision fusion Audio-Visual Speech Recognition. International Journal of Signal and Imaging Systems Engineering, 4(2):123–131, 2011.
  18. Rajavel R. and Sathidevi P. S. Adaptive reliability measure and optimum integration weight for decision fusion audiovisual speech recognition. Journal of Signal Processing Systems, pages 1–11, 2011.
  19. D. Reynolds. Gaussian mixture models. Encyclopedia of Biometric Recognition, 2008.
  20. A. A. Ross, K. Nandakumar, and A. K. Jain. Handbook of multibiometrics, volume 6. Springer-Verlag New York Inc, 2006.
  21. S. Sarkar and P. Mohanty. Globally linear embedding of biometric scores: An empirical study. In Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems, 2008. BTAS 2008. 2nd IEEE International Conference on, pages 1–6. IEEE, 2008.
  22. S. Thangasamy and L. Latha. Article:efficient approach to normalization of multimodal biometric scores. International Journal of Computer Applications, 32(10):57–64, October 2011. Published by Foundation of Computer Science, New York, USA.
  23. K. A. Toh. Fingerprint and speaker verification decisions fusion. In Image Analysis and Processing, 2003. Proceedings. 12th International Conference on, pages 626–631. IEEE, 2003.
  24. K. A. Toh and W. Y. Yau. Fingerprint and speaker verification decisions fusion using a functional link network. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews, IEEE Transactions on, 35(3):357–370, 2005.
  25. F. Van der Heijden, R. P. W. Duin, D. De Ridder, and DMJ Tax. Classification, parameter estimation and state estimation. Wiley Online Library, 2004.
  26. Y. Wang, Y. Wang, and T. Tan. Combining fingerprint and voiceprint biometrics for identity verification: an experimental comparison. Biometric Authentication, pages 289– 294, 2004.
  27. Wuzhili. Fingerprint Recognition. Honors Thesis, 2002.
  28. N. Yager and A. Amin. Fingerprint verification based on minutiae features: a review. Pattern Analysis & Applications, 7(1):94–113, 2004.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Reliability measures Separability measures Score level fusion score normalization noise robustness