CFP last date
20 December 2024
Reseach Article

Vendor Evaluation Using Multi Criteria Decision Making Technique

by Dr. R. Kesavan, B. Vijaya Ramnath, C. Elanchezhian
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 5 - Number 9
Year of Publication: 2010
Authors: Dr. R. Kesavan, B. Vijaya Ramnath, C. Elanchezhian
10.5120/943-1321

Dr. R. Kesavan, B. Vijaya Ramnath, C. Elanchezhian . Vendor Evaluation Using Multi Criteria Decision Making Technique. International Journal of Computer Applications. 5, 9 ( August 2010), 4-9. DOI=10.5120/943-1321

@article{ 10.5120/943-1321,
author = { Dr. R. Kesavan, B. Vijaya Ramnath, C. Elanchezhian },
title = { Vendor Evaluation Using Multi Criteria Decision Making Technique },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { August 2010 },
volume = { 5 },
number = { 9 },
month = { August },
year = { 2010 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 4-9 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume5/number9/943-1321/ },
doi = { 10.5120/943-1321 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T19:53:46.765636+05:30
%A Dr. R. Kesavan
%A B. Vijaya Ramnath
%A C. Elanchezhian
%T Vendor Evaluation Using Multi Criteria Decision Making Technique
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 5
%N 9
%P 4-9
%D 2010
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

A supply chain is a network of departments, which is involved in the manufacture of a product from the procurement of raw materials to the distribution of the final products to the customer. The term supply chain is already invoked effervescence among the managerial community. The purchasing function has gained importance in the supply chain management due to factors such as globalization, increased value addition in supply and accelerated technology change. A key and perhaps the most important process of the purchasing function is the efficient selection of suppliers, because it brings significant savings for the organization. In general, the supplier selection criteria most commonly used by the industries are quality, delivery and price. Also, depending on the corporate environment of the industries, the importance of the performance measure can vary. In this work a versatile technique namely multi criteria decision making (MCDM) technique which involves the analytical network process (ANP) and technique for order performance by similarity to idea solution (TOPSIS) method has been used to select the best vendor.

References
  1. Alberto De Toni and Guido Nassimbeni (2001), 'A method for the evaluation of suppliers co-design effort', International Journal of Production Economics, 72, 169-180.
  2. Amir Sanayei, Farid Mousavi S., Abdi M.R. and Ali Mohaghar (2008), 'An integrated group decision-making process for supplier selection and order allocation using multi-attribute utility theory and linear programming', Journal of the Franklin Institute, 16, 823-847.
  3. Banar M, Kose B.M. and Ozkan A. (2006), 'Choosing a municipal landfill site by Analytical Network Process', Article of Environ Geol, 52, 741-751.
  4. Bragila M. and Petroni A. (2000), 'A quality assurance – oriented methodology for handling trade-offs in supplier selection', International journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 30 No. 2, 96-111.
  5. Cevriye Gencer and Didem Gurpinar (2007), 'Analytical Network Process in supplier selection: A case study in an electronic firm', Applied Mathematical Modelling, 31, 2475-2486.
  6. Ching-Torng Lin, Hero Chiu and Po-Young Chu (2006), 'Agility index in the supply chain', International Journal of Production Economics, 100, 285-299.
  7. Chopra S. and Meindle P. (2001), 'Supply Chain Management Strategy, Planning and Operation', Prentice Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River, 1-24.
  8. Degraeve Z., Labro E. and Roodhooft F. (2000), 'An evaluation of vendor selection models from a total cost of ownership perspective', European Journal Of Operational Research, 125, 34-58
  9. Desheng Wu and David L. Olson (2008), 'Supply chain risk, simulation, and vendor selection', International Journal of Production Economics, 114, 646-655.
  10. Dickson G.W. (1966), 'An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions', Journal of Purchasing, 2, No. 1, 5-17.
  11. Dilay Celebi and Demet Bayraktar (2008), 'An integrated neural network and data envelopment analysis for supplier evaluation under incomplete information', Expert Systems with Applications, 35, 1698-1710.
  12. Elena Tsiporkova and Veselka Boeva (2006) 'Multi-step ranking of alternatives in a multi-criteria and multi-expert decision making environment', International Journal of Information Sciences, 176, 2673-2697.
  13. Filip Roodhooft and Jozef Konings (1996),'Vendor selection and evaluation - An activity based costing approach', European Journal of Operational Research, 96, 97-102.
  14. Hsu-Shih Shih, Huan-Jyh Shyur and Stanley Lee E. (2006), 'An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making', Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 45, 801-813.
  15. Huan Jyh Shyur and Hsu-Shih Shih (2006), 'A hybrid MCDM model for strategic vendor selection', Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 44, 749-761.
  16. Jiann Liang Yang, Huan Neng Chiu, Gwo Hshiung Tzeng and Ruey Huei Yeh (2008), 'Vendor selection by integrated fuzzy MCDM techniques with independent and interdependent relationships', International Journal of Information Sciences, 178, 623-642.
  17. Mitsutoshi Kojima, Kenichi Nakashima and Katsuhisa Ohno (2008), 'Performance evaluation of SCM in JIT environment', International Journal Of Production Economics, 115, 439-443.
  18. Mohammad Taghi Taghavifarad and Daniel Mirheydari (2008),'A new framework for evaluation and prioritization of supplier's using a Hierarchy Fuzzy TOPSIS', Proceedings of world academy of science, 31, 1-18.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Vendor Evaluation effervescence analytical network process (ANP) TOPSIS