CFP last date
20 December 2024
Call for Paper
January Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming January edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 December 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Improved Shuffled Frog Leaping Algorithm with Self-Adaptive Shuffling for Fuzzy Logic PD+G Controller Optimization in Robotic Manipulators

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

An Approach to Optimize the Cost of Software Quality Assurance Analysis

by Rajendra Kumar, Manju Lata
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 5 - Number 8
Year of Publication: 2010
Authors: Rajendra Kumar, Manju Lata
10.5120/936-1314

Rajendra Kumar, Manju Lata . An Approach to Optimize the Cost of Software Quality Assurance Analysis. International Journal of Computer Applications. 5, 8 ( August 2010), 1-4. DOI=10.5120/936-1314

@article{ 10.5120/936-1314,
author = { Rajendra Kumar, Manju Lata },
title = { An Approach to Optimize the Cost of Software Quality Assurance Analysis },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { August 2010 },
volume = { 5 },
number = { 8 },
month = { August },
year = { 2010 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 1-4 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume5/number8/936-1314/ },
doi = { 10.5120/936-1314 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T19:53:41.017226+05:30
%A Rajendra Kumar
%A Manju Lata
%T An Approach to Optimize the Cost of Software Quality Assurance Analysis
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 5
%N 8
%P 1-4
%D 2010
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

In this paper we present an approach to optimize the cost of software quality assurance. It points out, how to optimize the investment into various software quality assurance techniques and software quality. The expected and reliable development of high quality software regularly becomes a major problem due to late removal of defect. The detection and removal of defect is a software inspection providing technical support for the defect detection activity, and large volume of documentation are related to software inspection in the development of the software quality assurance as a cost effective. The value of an inspection improves the quality and saves defect cost. We describe the optimization model for selecting the best commercial off-the-self (COTS) software product among alternatives for each module. As objective function of the models is to maximize quality within a budgetary constraint and standard quality assurance (QA) methodologies cuts maintenance costs. Increase reliability, and reduces cycle time for new distribution modeling system. An analytical and stochastic model of the economics of analytical software quality assurance (SQA) is based on expected values. The model is able to handle different type of techniques such as static and dynamic. The model can be used to analysis different type of techniques theoretically, and to optimize the software quality assurance.

References
  1. Barry Boehm. “Software engineering economics”, Englewood, Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall, 1998.
  2. Sunita Chulani and Barry Boehm, “Modeling Software Defect Introduction and Removal: COQUALMO (COnstructive QUALity MOdel)”, Technical Report USC-CSE-99-510, University of Southern California, enterforSoftwareEngineering,1999.
  3. Sunita Devnani Chulani, “Bayesian Analysis of Software Cost and Quality Models”, PhD Dissertation, University of Southern California, 1999.
  4. Maria Victoria Cengarle, “Inspection and Testing – Towards combining both approaches”, Technical Report 024.02/E, Fraunhofer IESE, 2002.
  5. Stefan Bill, Bernd Freimut, Oliver Lait emberger. “Investigating the cost- effectiveness of reinspections in software development”, Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference of software Engineering, P. 155-164, May 12-19, 2001.
  6. J.S. Collofello, S.N. Woodfield, “Evaluating the Effectiveness of Reliability-Assurance techniques”, Journal of systems and software 9 (3) (1989) 191-195.
  7. L. Briand, K. EI Emam, O. Laitenberger, “Using Simulation to Build Inspection Efficiency Benehmarks for development projects”, T. Fussbroich, Proceedings of The 20th International Conference on Software Engineering, Kyoto, Japan, (1998) 340-349.
  8. Bev Littlewood, Peter T. Popov, Lorenzo Strigini, and Nick Shryane, “Modeling the Effects of Combining Diverse Software Fault Detection Techniques”, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 26(12): 1157-1967, 2000.
  9. William A. Mandeville, “Software costs of quality”, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 8(2): 315-318, 1990.
  10. Barry Boehm, LiGuo Huang, Apurva Jain, and Ray Madachy, “The ROI of software Dependability: The iDAVE model”, IEEE software, 219(3): 54-61, 2004.
  11. Watts S. Humphrey, “A Discipline for Software Engineering”, The SEI Series in Software Engineering, Addison-Wesley, 1995.
  12. Barry Boehm and Victor R. Basili, “Software Defect Reduction Top 10 List. IEEE Computer”, 34(1): 135-137, 2001.
  13. Daniel Galin, “Towards an inclusive model for the cost of software quality”, Software quality Professional, 6(4): 25-31, 2004.
  14. Stephen T. Knox, “Modeling the costs of software quality”, Digital Technical Journal, 5(4): 9-16, 1993.
  15. Crosby, P., “Quality is Free”, McGraw-Hill, 1979.
  16. McConnell, “Code Complete: A Practical Handbook of Software Construction”, Microsoft Press, 1993
  17. DeMarco, T., “Management can make quality impossible”, Cutter IT Summit, Boston, April 1999.
  18. Pressman, “Software Engineering”, McGraw Hill, 2005.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Defect detection modeling system software acquisitation analytical SQA quality Assurance

Powered by PhDFocusTM