CFP last date
20 January 2025
Call for Paper
February Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming February edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 January 2025

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
SFLA-Based Line Balancing and Task Optimization in Master-Slave Controlled Hanger Transportation Systems for Garment Production

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Comparison between Centralized & Decentralized Overlay Networks for Media Streaming

by Shailendra Mishra, Ranjeeta Yadav, Sachin Yadav
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 5 - Number 5
Year of Publication: 2010
Authors: Shailendra Mishra, Ranjeeta Yadav, Sachin Yadav
10.5120/909-1287

Shailendra Mishra, Ranjeeta Yadav, Sachin Yadav . Comparison between Centralized & Decentralized Overlay Networks for Media Streaming. International Journal of Computer Applications. 5, 5 ( August 2010), 33-36. DOI=10.5120/909-1287

@article{ 10.5120/909-1287,
author = { Shailendra Mishra, Ranjeeta Yadav, Sachin Yadav },
title = { Comparison between Centralized & Decentralized Overlay Networks for Media Streaming },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { August 2010 },
volume = { 5 },
number = { 5 },
month = { August },
year = { 2010 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 33-36 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume5/number5/909-1287/ },
doi = { 10.5120/909-1287 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T19:53:29.477732+05:30
%A Shailendra Mishra
%A Ranjeeta Yadav
%A Sachin Yadav
%T Comparison between Centralized & Decentralized Overlay Networks for Media Streaming
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 5
%N 5
%P 33-36
%D 2010
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

In this paper we examine the performance of two types of Overlay networks i.e. Peer-to-Peer (P2P) & Content Delivery Network (CDN) media streaming using Multiple Description Coding (MDC). In both the approaches many servers simultaneously serve one requesting client with complementary descriptions. This approach improves reliability and decreases the data rate a server has to provide. We have implemented both approaches in the ns-2 network simulator. The experimental results indicate that the performance of Multiple Description Coding-based media streaming in case of P2P network is better than CDN.

References
  1. Borella, M. S., D. Swider, S. Uludag, and G. B. Brewster, “Internet Packet Loss: Measurement and Implications for End-to- End QoS”, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Parallel Processing (1998).
  2. D. Xu, M. Hefeeda, S. Hambrusch, and B. Bhargava. “On peer-to-peer media streaming.” In Proc. of IEEE ICDCS, Vienna, Austria, July 2002.
  3. E. Adar, B. Huberman. “Free Riding on Gnutella”, First Monday, 5(10). October 2000.
  4. F. M. Cuenca-Acuna, R. P. Martin, T. D. Nguyen. “Autonomous Replication for High Availability in Unstructured P2P Systems”, Technical Report DCS-TR-509, Department of Computer Science, Rutgers University. April 2003.
  5. J. Apostolopoulos, T. Wong, W. Tan, S. Wee, “On Multiple Description Streaming with Content Delivery Networks”, IEEE INFOCOM, June 2002.
  6. J. Chu, K. Labonte, B. N. Levine, “Availability and locality measurements of peer-to-peer file systems,” in ITCom: Scalability and Traffic Control in IP Networks, Proceedings of SPIE. vol. 4868, Jul. 2002.
  7. J. G. Apostolopoulos, “Reliable video communication over lossy packet networks using multiple state encoding and path diversity”, VCIP, January 2001.
  8. J. Kangasharju, K.W. Ross, D. Turner, “Adaptive Replication and Replacement in P2P Caches”, 2002. working paper.
  9. M. Hefeeda, B. Bhargava “On-Demand Media Streaming Over the Internet”, CERIAS TR 2002- 20, Purdue University, June 2002.
  10. R. Baghwan, S. Savage, G, M. Voelker. “Understanding Availability”. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Peer-to-Peer Systems (IPTPS). February 2003.
  11. S. Saroiu, P. K. Gummadi, and S. D. Gribble, “A measurement study of peer-to-peer file sharing systems”. In Proceedings of Multimedia Computing and Networking (MMCN), Jan. 2002.
  12. T. Nguyen and A. Zakhor, “Distributed VideoStreaming”, Multimedia Computing and Networking 2002, Multimedia Conference, Jan 2002.
  13. The Network Simulator, http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/
  14. Tyron Stading, Petros Maniatis, Mary Baker, “Peer-to-Peer Caching Schemes to Address Flash Crowds”, 1st International Peer To Peer Systems Workshop (IPTPS) 2002.
  15. V. K. Goyal. “Multiple Description Coding: Compression Meets the Network”, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 18, n.5, page(s) 74 – 94. September 2001.
  16. V. Padmanabhan, H. Wang, P. Chou, and K. Sripanidkulchai. “Distributing streaming media content using cooperative networking.” In Proc of NOSSDAV’02, Miami Beach, FL, USA, May 2002.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

MDC CDN Video Streaming P2P Overlay Network

Powered by PhDFocusTM