CFP last date
20 January 2025
Call for Paper
February Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming February edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 January 2025

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
SFLA-Based Line Balancing and Task Optimization in Master-Slave Controlled Hanger Transportation Systems for Garment Production

Duc Hoang Nguyen
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Traffic Pattern based performance comparison of Reactive and Proactive protocols of Mobile Ad-hoc Networks

by Parveen Kakkar, Vikas Singla
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 5 - Number 10
Year of Publication: 2010
Authors: Parveen Kakkar, Vikas Singla
10.5120/949-1090

Parveen Kakkar, Vikas Singla . Traffic Pattern based performance comparison of Reactive and Proactive protocols of Mobile Ad-hoc Networks. International Journal of Computer Applications. 5, 10 ( August 2010), 16-20. DOI=10.5120/949-1090

@article{ 10.5120/949-1090,
author = { Parveen Kakkar, Vikas Singla },
title = { Traffic Pattern based performance comparison of Reactive and Proactive protocols of Mobile Ad-hoc Networks },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { August 2010 },
volume = { 5 },
number = { 10 },
month = { August },
year = { 2010 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 16-20 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume5/number10/949-1090/ },
doi = { 10.5120/949-1090 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T19:53:54.289555+05:30
%A Parveen Kakkar
%A Vikas Singla
%T Traffic Pattern based performance comparison of Reactive and Proactive protocols of Mobile Ad-hoc Networks
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 5
%N 10
%P 16-20
%D 2010
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

The primary objective of this research work is to study and investigate the performance measures of Reactive protocols (AODV, TORA) and Proactive protocols (DSDV) routing protocols of MANET using TCP & CBR based traffic models. In this paper we will simulate the environment used for analyzing, evaluating and implementing AODV, DSDV and TORA routing protocols in MANET, to analyze the performance of above said protocols based on Packet Delivery Ratio, Average End-to-End Delay and Throughput. We will investigate the effect of change in number of nodes on MANET routing protocols. Here, we will analyze and compare the performance of MANET routing protocols based on both CBR and TCP based traffic patterns. We have used the NS-2 simulator for performing various simulations and used awk scripts for analyzing the results.

References
  1. Das S. R., Perkins C. E., Royer E. M. and Marina M. K., “Performance comparison of two on-demand routing protocols for ad hoc networks,” IEEE Personal Communications Magazine, special issue on Mobile Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 16–29, February 2001.
  2. Dyer T. D., Boppana R. V., ” A Comparison of TCP performance over three routing protocols for mobile adhoc networks”, ACM Symposium on Mobile Adhoc Networking & Computing (Mobihoc) , October 2001.
  3. Wang F., Zhang Y., “ Improving TCP performance over Mobile Adhoc Networks with out of order detection and response” , © ACM Mobihoc, June 2002.
  4. Clausen T., Jacquet P., Viennot L., “Comparative study of CBR and TCP performance of MANET routing protocols”, Project HiPERCOM – INRIA, France, 2003.
  5. Mani P., Petr D.W., “Development and performance characterization of enhanced AODV routing for CBR and TCP traffic”, © 2004 IEEE.
  6. Ahmed S. and Alam M. S., “Performance Evaluation of Important Ad Hoc Network Protocols”, Hindawi Publishing Corporation, EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking Volume 2006, Article ID 78645, Pages 1–11.
  7. Grew P., Giudici F., Pagani E., “Specification of a functional architecture for e-learning supported by wireless technologies”, Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops, 2006. PerCom Workshops 2006. Fourth Annual IEEE International Conference on Volume, Issue, 13-17 March 2006 Page(s):5 pp. – 220
  8. Hogie L., Bouvry P., “An overview of MANETs Simulation”, Electronic notes in theoretical computer science, © 2006 Elsevier, doi:10.1016/j.entcs.2005.12.025.
  9. Lakshmi M. and Sankaranarayanan P.E., “Performance analysis of three routing protocols in wireless ad hoc networks”, Information technology Journal 5 (1): 114-120, © 2006 Asian Network for Scientific Information.
  10. Sundaram Rajagopalan and Chein-Chung Shen, “What does Using TCP as an Evaluation Tool Reveal about MANET Routing Protocols?”, IWCMC’06 © 2006 ACM Journal.
  11. Zaballos A., Vallejo A., Corral G., Abe.lla J., “AdHoc routing performance study using OPNET Modeler”, OPNETWORK'2006, Washington DC (United States), August 2006.
  12. Alsaadi M.Y., Qian Y.,” Performance Study of a Secure Routing Protocol in Wireless Mobile Ad Hoc Networks”, Wireless Pervasive Computing, 2007. ISWPC apos; 07. 2nd International Symposium on Volume, Issue, 5-7 Feb. 2007 Page(s): - Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/ISWPC.2007.342641, 1-4244-0523-8/07/$20.00 ©2007 IEEE.
  13. Jayakumar G. and Gopinath G., “Ad Hoc Mobile Wireless Networks Routing Protocols- A Review,” Journal of Computer Science, Vol. 3, No.8, pp. 574-582, 2007.
  14. Layuan L., Chunlin L., Peiyan L., “Performance evaluation and simulations of routing protocols, Computer Communications 30 (2007) 1890–1898, ©2007 Elsevier B.V.
  15. Trung H. D. , Benjapolakul W., Duc P. M., “Performance evaluation and comparison of different ad hoc routing protocols”, Computer Communications 30 (2007) 2478–2496 © 2007 Elsevier.
  16. Werapun W., Thavornvisit K., “Performance comparison of TCP and CBR in MAODV adhoc network”, Systems and Networks Communications ICSNC © IEEE, August 2007.
  17. Jayakumar G. and Gopinath G., “Performance Comparison of Two On-demand Routing Protocols for Ad-hoc Networks based on Random Way Point Mobility Model” , American Journal of Applied Sciences 5 (6): 659-664, © 2008 Science Publications.
  18. Masoudifar M., “A review and performance comparison of QoS multicastrouting protocols for MANETs”, Ad Hoc Networks 7 (2009) 1150–1155, doi: 10.1016/j.adhoc.2008.10.004, 2008 Elsevier B.V.
  19. Mukhija R., Saluja R., “Performance comparison of ad-hoc network routing protocols in different sizes” , MATEIT : 169–176, 2008.
  20. Aziz S. R. A., Endut N. A., Abdullah S. and Daud M. N. M., “Performance evaluation of AODV, DSR and DYMO routing protocol in MANET”, CSSR 08-09, 14 - 15 March 2009.
  21. Huang R., Zhuang Y., Cao Q., “Simulation and Analysis of Protocols in Ad Hoc Network”, International Conference on Electronic Computer Technology © 2009 IEEE.
  22. Suresh Kumar, R K Rathy and Diwakar Pandey, “Traffic pattern based performance comparison of two reactive routing protocols for ad hoc networks using NS@”, © 2009 IEEE.
  23. Vikas Singla, Rakesh Singla and Ajay Kumar, “Performance Evaluation and Simulation of Mobile Ad-hoc Network Routing Protocols”, International Journal of Engineering and Information Technology ,Volume 1 No. 1 October 2009.
  24. Qamar S., Manoj K., “Impact of Random Loss on TCP Performance in Mobile Ad-hoc Networks (IEEE 802.11): A Simulation-Based Analysis”, International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2010, pno. 228-233.
  25. Yogesh Chaba, Yudhvir Singh, Manish Joon, "Simulation Based Performance Analysis of On-Demand Routing Protocols in MANETs," Second International Conference on Computer Modeling and Simulation, 2010.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

MANET Routing Ad-hoc Protocol Performance Simulation AODV TORA DSDV

Powered by PhDFocusTM